Warrior General Games

it wouldnt affect the sim directly, it would effect morale going into the game but basically give everyone an even playing field before VA's and promos and such, but wouldnt change anything in game except the diminished skill values caused by team chem...

Originally posted by Dr Seuss
todays GLB is nothing like it used to be when you could properly manage this stuff, if you are going to reset a whole team you may as well help those only doing 20 dots , same difference

Are you really saying 60/80/80 is the same as 10\50\50?

interesting

Even if they set them back to 70/70/70 you are sitll better off at the 60/80/80

Originally posted by gbororats
it wouldnt affect the sim directly, it would effect morale going into the game but basically give everyone an even playing field before VA's and promos and such, but wouldnt change anything in game except the diminished skill values caused by team chem...

I believe that would be correct yes. Chem doesnt impact any other part of the build, it only diminishes attributes so everybody being at 100x3 all the time wouldnt matter.

Originally posted by .spider.
Are you really saying 60/80/80 is the same as 10\50\50?

interesting

Even if they set them back to 70/70/70 you are sitll better off at the 60/80/80

Actually, the overall takes into account the O and D.

So for Offense, 60 overall + 80 Offense = 70. Obviously 70/70/70 is going to be 70. The difference is that the 60 will come back at 2 morale per day until it hits 70. So under this scenario I'd take the 60/80/80.

Originally posted by refguru
Actually, the overall takes into account the O and D.

So for Offense, 60 overall + 80 Offense = 70. Obviously 70/70/70 is going to be 70. The difference is that the 60 will come back at 2 morale per day until it hits 70. So under this scenario I'd take the 60/80/80.

so you basically just proved my point LOL

Originally posted by .spider.
Are you really saying 60/80/80 is the same as 10\50\50?

interesting

Even if they set them back to 70/70/70 you are sitll better off at the 60/80/80

I'm saying that if you are going to reset one you have to reset the other if they want it. There shouldn't be a limit or number of moves required before you are eligible. You reset one because they ask, you reset the other if they ask.

Having the right to do so and if they should or not depending on the individual circumstance are two different things

Originally posted by .spider.
yeah i dont mind it for teams that are bringing in like their entire farm team 50+ dots....so long as it doesnt happen for teams that just had to replace 20+ dots due to poor roster management.

Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

Originally posted by Krille820
Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

i always thought that this was a terrible way to run a game. if you are not in a network working multiple farm teams, you might as well not play glb because the top levels are massively stacked against you. i alwyas thought a better way would have been to limit the total age on a team thus forcing teams to determine which positions to stack with plateau players and where to being in the younger players. aka like IRL teams do. that would be real team managemnt, not just being able to pay for a whole team at the right time.

Originally posted by Krille820
Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

Hence this thread about team cash and flex.

Originally posted by Krille820
Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

That's got nothing on having to ask for a reset with no roster changes and going from having 100/100/100 to some ridiculously low level back up to only 90/90/90

Originally posted by Dr Seuss
I'm saying that if you are going to reset one you have to reset the other if they want it. There shouldn't be a limit or number of moves required before you are eligible. You reset one because they ask, you reset the other if they ask.

Having the right to do so and if they should or not depending on the individual circumstance are two different things

I see your point....i guess I've never asked after making 20ish moves, but I always assumed they wouldnt do it just cuz you asked.

Originally posted by Krille820
Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

feels good man

Damn, imagine the idea to get 100 million team cash for 1000 flex points. Or basically getting income for each scheduled ranked scrim.

Originally posted by Krille820
Feels even worse moving over a entire roster just to get 420+ millions in cash imo, re: the poor roster management.

It's not that big of a deal tbh. It's not like spider swapped a NATPRO directly to WL. They should have kept the trade dots for cash system alive. Would have traded 50 million for a CPU dot then. When it comes to cash, you simply nowadays have to decide where to invest the money (home or away promos).

I remember Razorbacks f.e. reset their chem in s59 in which they won the title and barely sneaked in the POs with the 9-7 record. Could have lost the two 1 point games and gone 1-2 instead of 3-0 the first three games with a worse chem situation. Never complained or will be complaining about chem resets because I rather play top competition at its best with equal chem than rather end up seeing 65-7 games against chem fcked WL teams. So for the guys pointing out Miami about that shit, you better get the overall facts straight.
"Take that for data" - Fizedale

everyone can get a chem reset, you just have to ask for it, but make sure you ask right away or else you'll get a 70/70/70 reset 10 days after the first person that asked... i dont think DD has been holding back on the resets, but you have to see if it is even worth it. Like i said earlier the chem made sense early on in the game when more agents were active and there were more dots to choose from. I think at this point you have 12 teams in WL and another maybe 8, if you are lucky, that can legit compete to make it to WL from pro and are actually still trying to. After that there's not much else. The bottom line is team chem is just outdated at this point. Collusion is no longer a thing.

Didnt BSS or something swap from pro to WL back in the day too?

The problem with buying cash for flex is that whole "rich get richer" but if you could win some team cash for winning tournaments, or making the playoffs, that gives incentive to keep the games competitive. I mean they did away with playoff ticket sale money and gave people nachos, put the ticket sale money back and let people try to get a top seed again rather than coast in. But it all requires changes to the code which unfortunately we already know is never going to happen again.

my suggestion would liven up the game a lot more before making it crash hard is speeding up the build processes so more poeple build teams, more competition, but then everyones flex will run out way faster cycling through flex faster. It will either get more people to buy flex when they run low, or cause people to quit playing when they run out. Either way its worth a shot, but again, NGTH

I don't think you shoudl be able to buy cash for flex. I simply think we should be playing for more than a trophy. I am floored you don't win flex as you win the playoffs. I can't believe for the cost of things and the inability to trade for cash, etc. that you can't win cash for winning in the playoffs. YET, you get flex for the top 3 places in the GLB tourneys.