Then again Wise's 126 agility WR spins some against some CB's.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > CASE STUDY: The INTERCEPTION RATE IN GLB IS BROKEN AND NEEDS TO BE FIXED
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Not if wr's and te's start spinning.
HBs would spin quite a bit more, so yes, your suggestion would swing things even more away from passing.
Not if wr's and te's start spinning.
HBs would spin quite a bit more, so yes, your suggestion would swing things even more away from passing.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
HBs would spin quite a bit more, so yes, your suggestion would swing things even more away from passing.
I mean ya if you don't plan on fixing your CB to tackle better sure.
HBs would spin quite a bit more, so yes, your suggestion would swing things even more away from passing.
I mean ya if you don't plan on fixing your CB to tackle better sure.
bhall43
offline
offline
Outside of when morale is totally drained broken tackles aren't even really ridiculous for HB's. Mostly the pancakes and the design of Big I formation is what really kills people.
Redass Ranch
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Avenger
Are WR's and TE's built with 97 agility and 12 in spinning, and 22.5 break tackle? Then no.
not as many now, as there use to be... but if they increased Spin (again) then they would be built (again)
Are WR's and TE's built with 97 agility and 12 in spinning, and 22.5 break tackle? Then no.
not as many now, as there use to be... but if they increased Spin (again) then they would be built (again)
WiSeIVIaN
online
online
Originally posted by bhall43
Then again Wise's 126 agility WR spins some against some CB's.
lol
Then again Wise's 126 agility WR spins some against some CB's.
lol
WiSeIVIaN
online
online
Originally posted by Redass Ranch
not as many now, as there use to be... but if they increased Spin (again) then they would be built (again)
Spin doesn't need a buff, but WRs/TEs having broken bad balance after catching the ball is a pretty big detrement imo.
not as many now, as there use to be... but if they increased Spin (again) then they would be built (again)
Spin doesn't need a buff, but WRs/TEs having broken bad balance after catching the ball is a pretty big detrement imo.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
lol
I mean he does. Who knows the quality of the ones he is against though.
lol
I mean he does. Who knows the quality of the ones he is against though.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Spin doesn't need a buff, but WRs/TEs having broken bad balance after catching the ball is a pretty big detrement imo.
I don't know that spin doesn't need a buff. I mean, it would have to be completely counter to power backs of course. But you can't tell me elusive backs are really good for anything at this point. I mean besides making the point that they can eat up shitty teams almost as much as power backs.
Spin doesn't need a buff, but WRs/TEs having broken bad balance after catching the ball is a pretty big detrement imo.
I don't know that spin doesn't need a buff. I mean, it would have to be completely counter to power backs of course. But you can't tell me elusive backs are really good for anything at this point. I mean besides making the point that they can eat up shitty teams almost as much as power backs.
the only elusives worth a damn are the ones with 80 str min and power thru
DarkRogue
offline
offline
Originally posted by gbororats
the only elusives worth a damn are the ones with 80 str min and power thru
At this point I probably won't carry any at all, scats are fine just not pure elusive backs.
the only elusives worth a damn are the ones with 80 str min and power thru
At this point I probably won't carry any at all, scats are fine just not pure elusive backs.
sunder B
offline
offline
lol - not even a "bad pass" : http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2606664&pbp_id=2799840
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by sunder B
lol - not even a "bad pass" : http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2606664&pbp_id=2799840
lower the bullet setting.
lol - not even a "bad pass" : http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2606664&pbp_id=2799840
lower the bullet setting.
sunder B
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
lower the bullet setting.
Not even my dot, but lol at that response and kind of exhibit A as to why the bullet slider in general is a joke. A HS QB wouldn't miss that bad, let alone a pro QB as was the case here.
lower the bullet setting.
Not even my dot, but lol at that response and kind of exhibit A as to why the bullet slider in general is a joke. A HS QB wouldn't miss that bad, let alone a pro QB as was the case here.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.