If a team owner sells the team in the middle of the year allow the teams higest GM to take control of it. In an order some what like this.
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
Forum > Suggestions > When Owner sells a team allow team GM to take control
Kobeisbest
offline
offline
BIG + 1 Ive been in that situation when I wanted to take control of it when the owner didn't seel it but he choose not to renew it. Which ended up reseting everything.
EchoedSilence
offline
offline
But does the GM then have to put in the flex required to own the team?
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
Originally posted by EchoedSilence
But does the GM then have to put in the flex required to own the team?
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
yeah the GM has to put in the flex required...owning a team isnt free
But does the GM then have to put in the flex required to own the team?
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
yeah the GM has to put in the flex required...owning a team isnt free
Originally posted by Dub J
Originally posted by Gunther-
You can already do this...just PM support.
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
Originally posted by Gunther-
You can already do this...just PM support.
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
Edited by yello1 on Nov 10, 2011 14:31:54
Originally posted by Redskin2141
If a team owner sells the team in the middle of the year allow the teams higest GM to take control of it. In an order some what like this.
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
why is OC before DC? DCs win championships.. Also CFO is super easy, probably the least likely to be next in line to be owner.
Co owner
DC
then every other lame GM.
If a team owner sells the team in the middle of the year allow the teams higest GM to take control of it. In an order some what like this.
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
why is OC before DC? DCs win championships.. Also CFO is super easy, probably the least likely to be next in line to be owner.
Co owner
DC
then every other lame GM.
Edited by ProfessionalKop on Nov 10, 2011 15:17:02
Dub J
offline
offline
Agents should still get the 3 days to remove themselves from the team if this was implemented.
Redskin2141
offline
offline
Originally posted by EchoedSilence
But does the GM then have to put in the flex required to own the team?
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
I think you should pay flext but not as much instead of 400 I would do 250 for the rest of the year and the team GM can not take over unless the team is sold after day 15 in the year.
But does the GM then have to put in the flex required to own the team?
Otherwise, I can see this as a way of people 'buying teams' for others, setting them as GMs, then selling the team. Not to mention that the owner was the original buyer, and therefore, should be free to sell it if they wish without someone else taking it over.
No, it's not necessarily fair if they do it - And just plain wrong, but it is their team and their flex points to do as they wish with.
I see too many loopholes and issues arising with this.
I think you should pay flext but not as much instead of 400 I would do 250 for the rest of the year and the team GM can not take over unless the team is sold after day 15 in the year.
Redskin2141
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Dub J
Originally posted by Gunther-
You can already do this...just PM support.
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
Originally posted by Dub J
Originally posted by Gunther-
You can already do this...just PM support.
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
Originally posted by Redskin2141
If a team owner sells the team in the middle of the year allow the teams higest GM to take control of it. In an order some what like this.
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
+1
If a team owner sells the team in the middle of the year allow the teams higest GM to take control of it. In an order some what like this.
CO OWNER
CFO
OC
DC
RECRUITER
SCOUT
GM
+1
ChildishGambino
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
+1 for this option.
No need for a list imo.
Better to automate isn't it?
Say on Day 40-41 nightly the team goes unowned and a PM goes to the GMs on the club giving them a link to buy the team, with a note that the link expires with the 41 to 42 rollover.
+1 for this option.
No need for a list imo.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Agents should still get the 3 days to remove themselves from the team if this was implemented.
Agents should still get the 3 days to remove themselves from the team if this was implemented.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
