User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Position Talk > Anyone have a good training guide?
Page:
 
TheGreatAus
offline
Link
 
First off turd sandwich, this was said before I said agility=acceleration

Originally posted by TheGreatAus
Thats true, but what I think jdbolick is getting at that higher speed values (130+) will require a higher accelaration factors since they have to get to their top speed in the same time. And honestly, agility is not as good as advertised with speedsters. First step and quick cut are what you want when you get agility to a respectable level (68+, assuming ALG's take it higher), its a better use of SP's in general.


Im actually explaining what you were trying to say, or what you should have said, only because you suck as what you claim to be good at, a mentor.

This shows the world, not even the GLB world, how dumb and ignorant you really are
Originally posted by jdbolick

Good lord, you can't even do algebra. No, that's not what you would get. You'd get agility1 - agility 2 = acceleration1 - acceleration2, which does not simplify to agility = acceleration. You're trying to invent bullshit excuses for saying something ignorant instead of just admitting that you screwed up. Moreover, that's not the equation for acceleration anyway.


agility1 - agility 2= agility3 (or the remainder of the agility, regardless IT IS AGILITY! WTF DONT YOU GET ABOUT THAT??)
acceleration1-acceleration2 = acceleration3

In this equation: agility1 - agility 2 = acceleration1 - acceleration2, simply replace (agility1 - agility 2) with agility 3, replace (acceleration1-acceleration2) with acceleration 3, and voila! agility3=acceleration3 . Seriously, how retarded are you?? Dont go spouting off about some ignorance you claim I have, when you cant even do basic math!! Especially when I told everyone in a statement prior to agility=acceleration that FS is important as well. In fact, I will write an equation that would basically state a menial relationship between the various SA's.

With regards to acceleration only: speed+agility+ x(First Step SA) + y (Blitz SA) + z (Closing Speed SA) + a(Tunnel Vision SA)=acceleration, where x, y, z, and a are all the integral values of the SA in question.

I may have left out a SA or two, but you should get the jist. Well, maybe not you, but others will.

I will even clear up what you have been trying to say in this whole conversation with regards to how speed and agility are even linked: Speed will allow for a maximum theoretical amount of acceleration, whereas agility and FS (and other SA's) will allow you to reach the theoretical ceiling of acceleration. In 10 yards a dot with 150 speed has to get to that speed...the more agility you have, the more FS you have, will allow you to to get closer to the speed 150 allows in that 10 yards.

Go back to flipping burgers and beating your wife, you clearly dont have the intellect or know how to even be a part of this, or any constructive conversation for that matter, you just say blather to try and make yourself feel needed as nowhere else in your life provides you that.

You say I havent done anything? http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_awards.pl?player_id=867663. Have you had a QB lead teams to championships and get into the WL? Im not going to waste my time looking through your trash to see if you have, you are a waste of my time and everyone elses time in this thread (and GLB if you want to go there)
 
TheGreatAus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

and that Quick Cut somehow improves acceleration.


And no, I never once said that. I thought I cleared that up in my last post. It PREVENTS you from having to accelerate, can you not see how it is linked to a player NOT having to accelerate when at full speed because you lost speed? Is that not equally as important as trying to get to top speed?? Jeezus H Krist man
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TheGreatAus
First off turd sandwich, this was said before I said agility=acceleration

And that quote was completely wrong too. It's amazing that you keep bringing up "evidence" that only succeeds in highlighting how clueless you are. What you claimed I was saying had nothing at all to do with what I actually said, which I had to explain because of your absurd post. Moreover, nowhere in that are you contradicting your incorrect claim that "agility=acceleration."

Originally posted by
Im actually explaining what you were trying to say, or what you should have said, only because you suck as what you claim to be good at, a mentor. This shows the world, not even the GLB world, how dumb and ignorant you really are

Again, not only did you get it wrong when you attempted to interpret what I was saying, but what you claimed was also wrong. This is not even complicated, you just obviously have enormous difficulty understanding even basic concepts. Clearly you're not aware of your own intellectual limitations, which is why you keep acting like you're some kind of genius even though you repeatedly say things that are ridiculously false.

Originally posted by
agility1 - agility 2= agility3

Thank whatever god you believe in that you will never know how frustrating it is to try to be someone like me explaining something to someone like you. It's not just the fact that you have an incredibly tough time grasping any information, but you're also amusingly belligerent about your failure to understand.

Once again, it is wrong in any context relating to GLB for someone to say that "agility = acceleration," because that simply is not a true equivalence. Posting that means you're stating that agility is the only factor in acceleration, which it is not. The problem here is that you just don't have the integrity or the manhood to admit that you said something dumb, so you have to invent all kinds of excuses to explain why the dumb thing you said really wasn't dumb after all.

Originally posted by
I will even clear up what you have been trying to say in this whole conversation with regards to how speed and agility are even linked: Speed will allow for a maximum theoretical amount of acceleration, whereas agility and FS (and other SA's) will allow you to reach the theoretical ceiling of acceleration. In 10 yards a dot with 150 speed has to get to that speed...the more agility you have, the more FS you have, will allow you to to get closer to the speed 150 allows in that 10 yards.

Once again, this is wrong. You keep saying things that are completely false, and it's because you don't actually have a clue what you're talking about. Speed & agility both affect your maximum rate of acceleration, while energy and other factors influence whether or not your dot hits that maximum at any particular time.

Originally posted by
And no, I never once said that. I thought I cleared that up in my last post. It PREVENTS you from having to accelerate, can you not see how it is linked to a player NOT having to accelerate when at full speed because you lost speed? Is that not equally as important as trying to get to top speed?? Jeezus H Krist man

Yes, you did. http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4242909&page=6#38220393 In that post you said, "At many points, maybe not in this forum thread specifically, I have stated that First step and quick cut will both be far more valuable than agility in terms of acceleration"

Originally posted by
You say I havent done anything? http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_awards.pl?player_id=867663. Have you had a QB lead teams to championships and get into the WL? Im not going to waste my time looking through your trash to see if you have, you are a waste of my time and everyone elses time in this thread (and GLB if you want to go there)

Your QB has 43 interceptions in 680 pass attempts the last two seasons, which is pathetic. And I believe I already noted that Gold Coast went 2-14 during its very brief World League appearance. But for the record, yes my QB not only made it to the WL but his team made the playoffs all three seasons. None of that is particularly important except that you shouldn't be giving anyone advice because you've never built any good players. Look at the EL for your dots and compare them against other players from that creation date. They're bad. You can't build, and you say things that are completely wrong when you're trying to give people "advice." You need to stop, for their sake and yours.

Originally posted by
Go back to flipping burgers and beating your wife, you clearly dont have the intellect or know how to even be a part of this, or any constructive conversation for that matter, you just say blather to try and make yourself feel needed as nowhere else in your life provides you that.

 
TheGreatAus
offline
Link
 
Someone else even helped you out with agility = acceleration in the formula I wrote. Believe what you want, but you may be the dumbest person I've ran into in this game.

 
TheGreatAus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
They're bad. You can't build, and you say things that are completely wrong when you're trying to give people "advice." You need to stop, for their sake and yours.


Hardly, turd sandwich. You have created 116 players, how many were before your QB? How much money did you spend? My QB and WR were my 3rd and 4th, I made some mistakes on them as I still was learning the game, Ill admit that. But lets do the math on this...2 of my 7 guys made it to WL, thats ~28.5% of my players...my 3rd and 4th nonetheless! And my DT helped get them there, so that may as well be 3/7, which is almost 43% of my guys making it to the WL! OMFG! Whats your hit rate? Not that I, I know that much.

But I can guarantee that my new players now will destroy yours in a heartbeat when it comes to WL in the future, assuming your crapass dots can make it back. Because I understand the relationships in the game and talk to people and actually fact check before I make decisions in assigning points, something that you, with so many dots, hardly has time to do and cant keep track of shit.

So honestly, GFY and get a clue, youve showed this thread how dumb you really are nub.

 
The Duff Man
offline
Link
 
And that my friends is called....closure.
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
ib4l
 
Fumanchuchu
fonky
offline
Link
 
Wow, I thought the cat shit behind my chair, turns out it was this thread.
 
Fumanchuchu
fonky
offline
Link
 
No, wait, it was definitely cat shit.

But this thread is still terrible.
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Fumanchuchu
No, wait, it was definitely cat shit.

But this thread is still terrible.


 
direfire
offline
Link
 
jdbolick>underdawg08,thegreataus

and all three of you look like douches. Plus the whole agility/speed thing. I'm almost positive both partys are saying the same thing. Also why can't someone be the bigger man and just quit argueing at one point? Argueing facts is one thing and interesting to read, but argueing grammar spelling and who schooled who is just stupid and someone should be the bigger man and just stop and leave the thread alone.
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by direfire


and all three of you look like douches. Plus the whole agility/speed thing.


I know, it's why this has been so fun.
 
zamtik
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by direfire
jdbolick>underdawg08,thegreataus

and all three of you look like douches. Plus the whole agility/speed thing. I'm almost positive both partys are saying the same thing. Also why can't someone be the bigger man and just quit argueing at one point? Argueing facts is one thing and interesting to read, but argueing grammar spelling and who schooled who is just stupid and someone should be the bigger man and just stop and leave the thread alone.


says the guy who bumps the thread 5 days later
 
direfire
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zamtik
says the guy who bumps the thread 5 days later


 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.