User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by NEXT
Who doesn't want me as a GM?
I have connections.


I am the recruiter lol I think we drafted you or something didn't we?
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Rankings updated. See initial post.
 
NEXT
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD
Originally posted by NEXT

Who doesn't want me as a GM?
I have connections.


I am the recruiter lol I think we drafted you or something didn't we?


haha no.
The Owner loves me..
 
EatDaBeaver
offline
Link
 
ohnoes... worst ranked 2-0 team FTW!
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by NEXT
haha no.
The Owner loves me..


Team forums = no info all trolling... I love trolling
 
droopy5069
offline
Link
 
Who would have thought you could drop from #1 to #11 with a win...
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by droopy5069
Who would have thought you could drop from #1 to #11 with a win...


Bugfix used on this week's. Last week had a bug where if teams holding there opponents to negative yards running or passing caused problems for everyone when being compared to the negative standards

These rankings are not that different from what week 1 results looked like when the bug was fixed. I simply chose to not repost the week 1 results was all. So sorry for the drop in ranking but FT looks to be clearly a cut above the rest right now at least.
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Bump.

Rankings for week 3 updated.
 
EatDaBeaver
offline
Link
 
Nestled comfortably 3 spots behind the 0-3 Lumberjacks...

;0
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
Nestled comfortably 3 spots behind the 0-3 Lumberjacks...

;0


Your higher in Gon's rankings
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
Nestled comfortably 3 spots behind the 0-3 Lumberjacks...

It takes into account the quality of the wins and losses. Basically to take into account things like defeating 3 cpu teams by a moderate margin vs just barely losing to undefeated teams type of things. Sorry if you don't like it, each week the value of beating a bad team decreases and the value of playing a quality team increases and eventually blowouts against cpu teams amount to almost nothing on the rating scale.
 
EatDaBeaver
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Westwind

It takes into account the quality of the wins and losses. Basically to take into account things like defeating 3 cpu teams by a moderate margin vs just barely losing to undefeated teams type of things. Sorry if you don't like it, each week the value of beating a bad team decreases and the value of playing a quality team increases and eventually blowouts against cpu teams amount to almost nothing on the rating scale.


lol... I know how the rankings work, I'm actually more than happy to be considered an "underdog" if you will... not that I plan to upset everyone, its just a lot easier being little ole' me rather than walk around with a target on my back.
 
droopy5069
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
lol... I know how the rankings work, I'm actually more than happy to be considered an "underdog" if you will... not that I plan to upset everyone, its just a lot easier being little ole' me rather than walk around with a target on my back.


if you have a 0 in the L column, then you have a target on your back, imo.
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
lol... I know how the rankings work, I'm actually more than happy to be considered an "underdog" if you will... not that I plan to upset everyone, its just a lot easier being little ole' me rather than walk around with a target on my back.


Maybe teams won't TB vs you, but more than likely they will
 
JovialEvil
offline
Link
 
Gabon is too high. Higher then 6 undefeated teams.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.