Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bigpimpin123
Originally posted by wombat killer

What if Rawle Tech, Vampires and U Canes all finisth at 13-3? How would the ranking work?

best record vs tied teams. if they are all 1-1 vs each other it goes by points scored.

Just to follow up on that:

Rawle Tech beat the Canes, lost to Vampires.
Vampires beat Rawle Tech, lost to Canes.
Canes beat Vampires, lost to Rawle Tech.

Therefore, head-to-head doesn't work if the teams all end up with the same regular season record - so it goes to points scored. As of the moment (through 14 games) points scored are:

Rawle Tech 480
Vampires 476
Canes 358

So the ranking would be Rawle Tech, then Vampires, then Canes if all three teams scored identical point totals over their next two games and ended up with identical regular season records...

Originally posted by Thorrig
Originally posted by bigpimpin123

Originally posted by wombat killer


What if Rawle Tech, Vampires and U Canes all finisth at 13-3? How would the ranking work?

best record vs tied teams. if they are all 1-1 vs each other it goes by points scored.

Just to follow up on that:

Rawle Tech beat the Canes, lost to Vampires.
Vampires beat Rawle Tech, lost to Canes.
Canes beat Vampires, lost to Rawle Tech.

Therefore, head-to-head doesn't work if the teams all end up with the same regular season record - so it goes to points scored. As of the moment (through 14 games) points scored are:

Rawle Tech 480
Vampires 476
Canes 358

So the ranking would be Rawle Tech, then Vampires, then Canes if all three teams scored identical point totals over their next two games and ended up with identical regular season records...

Great work my friend. Thanks

Originally posted by Daman
i think new england was taking steriods. just kidding, great game guys.

Oh, we were. Lots of em.

Originally posted by Dirty Mo Posse
Originally posted by HaplosDog

Originally posted by bigpimpin123


Originally posted by BigD123



Originally posted by bigpimpin123




they are still 1st in the conference so idk what you mean BigD, maybe im confused

You're right, thats really strange, earlier they were #2 before Canberra played. For some reason it looks like points scored is still the tiebreaker, but it was supposed to be head to head now.

started a thread about it in the GLB thread. dont exactly know why, maybe im just that bored

It's because new England and Canberra haven't played each other yet, so they can't rank all three 13-1 teams with HTH, so for now it's points scored. After next game, when NE plays Canberra, it will be HTH.

That means that if NE wins, they'll be first, Brisbane second and Canberra third. If Canberra wins, and Brisbane wins against the Cardinals, Brisbane will be first, then Canberra, and NE third.


It is possible for the Bearcats to slip into the Top 3!



DMP



No respect as usual but we're used to that.

Originally posted by iowastylee
Originally posted by Dirty Mo Posse

Originally posted by HaplosDog


Originally posted by bigpimpin123



Originally posted by BigD123




Originally posted by bigpimpin123




they are still 1st in the conference so idk what you mean BigD, maybe im confused

You're right, thats really strange, earlier they were #2 before Canberra played. For some reason it looks like points scored is still the tiebreaker, but it was supposed to be head to head now.

started a thread about it in the GLB thread. dont exactly know why, maybe im just that bored

It's because new England and Canberra haven't played each other yet, so they can't rank all three 13-1 teams with HTH, so for now it's points scored. After next game, when NE plays Canberra, it will be HTH.

That means that if NE wins, they'll be first, Brisbane second and Canberra third. If Canberra wins, and Brisbane wins against the Cardinals, Brisbane will be first, then Canberra, and NE third.


It is possible for the Bearcats to slip into the Top 3!



DMP



No respect as usual but we're used to that.


I don't think it's a matter of no respect. You're our only less, so you'd better believe that we're paying attention to you. In this case, I think they were just describing ways that the current 3 way tie could play out.

I don't know if we have gained any respect or not this season, but we do have 2 top teams looking to kick our asses next time we meet.
I should have got on board with having coordinators way sooner than 2/3rds through the 2nd season as they seem to have helped tremendously in some respects, before that game planning was exhausting.

Originally posted by BigD123
Originally posted by kevins4484

lol at bigD making the thread. Would have thought it was a Pride player. Leave it up to the lamers on the other side of town to follow our every move.

"no we will not date you, and tell wondertramps sister to stop calling the doc, he needs to pratice!"

If yall didn't parade your greatness up and down this forum, I might not be inclined to do so,

Enjoy sharing the distinction of being the only teams in Brisbane to not be the #1 seed in their conference with these boys
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=971

since both the Gods and the Heat of AA are sitting pretty right now.

in all fairness the Brisbane Bombers/Mauraders were abandoned by Skeld who had a good team in his own right. They fell on hard times and couldnt compete so apparently he just faded away.

Originally posted by MC_Hammer
I don't know if we have gained any respect or not this season, but we do have 2 top teams looking to kick our asses next time we meet.
I should have got on board with having coordinators way sooner than 2/3rds through the 2nd season as they seem to have helped tremendously in some respects, before that game planning was exhausting.

Yeah man I hear ya. I couldn't do both the offense and defense it was just too much on top of running the team. Luckily I decided to hand over the whole offense to Wombat last year. It makes a world of difference.

what is up with this thread. i feel hated.

I love Bronco Nagurski amazing 1.9 YPC in the game. Amazingly impressive.

That game made me smile..don't know why, but did.

Originally posted by iowastylee
Originally posted by Dirty Mo Posse

Originally posted by HaplosDog


Originally posted by bigpimpin123



Originally posted by BigD123




Originally posted by bigpimpin123





they are still 1st in the conference so idk what you mean BigD, maybe im confused

You're right, thats really strange, earlier they were #2 before Canberra played. For some reason it looks like points scored is still the tiebreaker, but it was supposed to be head to head now.

started a thread about it in the GLB thread. dont exactly know why, maybe im just that bored

It's because new England and Canberra haven't played each other yet, so they can't rank all three 13-1 teams with HTH, so for now it's points scored. After next game, when NE plays Canberra, it will be HTH.

That means that if NE wins, they'll be first, Brisbane second and Canberra third. If Canberra wins, and Brisbane wins against the Cardinals, Brisbane will be first, then Canberra, and NE third.


It is possible for the Bearcats to slip into the Top 3!



DMP



No respect as usual but we're used to that.

Sad But True!!



DMP

Originally posted by kevins4484
lol at bigD making the thread. Would have thought it was a Pride player. Leave it up to the lamers on the other side of town to follow our every move.

"no we will not date you, and tell wondertramps sister to stop calling the doc, he needs to pratice!"

yeah...im a bit hung over from last night....i probably partied with more beautiful women last night then kevins4484 has seen his whole life...perhaps this is the alcohol withdrawal talking but, wasn't it your team that started that lame "and there was 1" thread...and you're here talking about this thread....when its clearly making fun of your own thread....i think you should probably stick to your stupid sexual jokes cuz you got nothing outside of that...

You are trying to brag about your social life through a computer game, that is the acme of pitiful. Just a hunch but I bet a) you exaggerated the events of last night(which is pretty sad considering nobody cares) and b) your definition of "partied with beautiful women" is you chugging a bottle of rubbing alcohol and following a fat chick around for several hours before getting turned down and crying yourself to sleep that night.

Originally posted by the hurricane
You are trying to brag about your social life through a computer game, that is the acme of pitiful. Just a hunch but I bet a) you exaggerated the events of last night(which is pretty sad considering nobody cares) and b) your definition of "partied with beautiful women" is you chugging a bottle of rubbing alcohol and following a fat chick around for several hours before getting turned down and crying yourself to sleep that night.

9/10 on the trash talk, the Bandits could learn a thing or two about talking shit from this post.

Originally posted by the hurricane
You are trying to brag about your social life through a computer game, that is the acme of pitiful. Just a hunch but I bet a) you exaggerated the events of last night(which is pretty sad considering nobody cares) and b) your definition of "partied with beautiful women" is you chugging a bottle of rubbing alcohol and following a fat chick around for several hours before getting turned down and crying yourself to sleep that night.

geez some of you alpha conference boys are a sensitive bunch...me and kevins talk smack all the time to each other..just a little side fun for both us playing this game...and i dont really care what you think about my social life...you can choose to believe me or not...but the fact my post got your little panties twisted tells me that somewhere in your lonely little existence part of you is jealous that i could be very well telling the truth...even if were to be the unfortunate guy to be turned down by a fat chick, id still rather be that guy then you...