How much does this go into how a team plays on the site cause looking around the league it seems some teams are suffering from REALLY poor team chemistry of which i thought the Eagles chem looked bad but compared to some of the other teams it looks rather good
Treyseru
offline
offline
Yeah the Unsavory Gentlemen need to work on our overall. Our defense has pretty good chemistry though.
MeHigh7
offline
offline
It plays a pretty big part. If you have two evenly matched teams and one has 80+ chemistry while the other has 30, the score might end up being 27 - 7 even though they are even teams.
oronis
offline
offline
I actually disagree MeHigh7. In fact, our first game was: http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=3559&team2=3550
We hade an overall chem of like 80+ and the Bulls had an overall chem of 10. They still won the game. So I mean, if you think of team chemistry as a tiebreaker, sure, but it doesn't do much more than that.
We hade an overall chem of like 80+ and the Bulls had an overall chem of 10. They still won the game. So I mean, if you think of team chemistry as a tiebreaker, sure, but it doesn't do much more than that.
TheRooster
offline
offline
I only really noticed a difference when our chemistry was in the red last season.
bb174
offline
offline
Originally posted by oronis
I actually disagree MeHigh7. In fact, our first game was: http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=3559&team2=3550
We hade an overall chem of like 80+ and the Bulls had an overall chem of 10. They still won the game. So I mean, if you think of team chemistry as a tiebreaker, sure, but it doesn't do much more than that.
give it time you'll learn, been on a Pro League team with good players and crappy chemistry and routinely get destroyed
I actually disagree MeHigh7. In fact, our first game was: http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=3559&team2=3550
We hade an overall chem of like 80+ and the Bulls had an overall chem of 10. They still won the game. So I mean, if you think of team chemistry as a tiebreaker, sure, but it doesn't do much more than that.
give it time you'll learn, been on a Pro League team with good players and crappy chemistry and routinely get destroyed
Mr. Likable
offline
offline
Chemistry only affects team game play by 9% max. I read that in the forums from Bort.
Dogwar
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mr. Likable
Chemistry only affects team game play by 9% max. I read that in the forums from Bort.lol 9%..its cumalative..because if it was only 9% max their wouldnt be much difference between 100 chem team and 10 chem team at 25 +..12.5 points and thats if the team is equal after the soft capp that aint shit.
Chemistry only affects team game play by 9% max. I read that in the forums from Bort.lol 9%..its cumalative..because if it was only 9% max their wouldnt be much difference between 100 chem team and 10 chem team at 25 +..12.5 points and thats if the team is equal after the soft capp that aint shit.
autogyro
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dogwar
Originally posted by Mr. Likable
Chemistry only affects team game play by 9% max. I read that in the forums from Bort.lol 9%..its cumalative..because if it was only 9% max their wouldnt be much difference between 100 chem team and 10 chem team at 25 +..12.5 points and thats if the team is equal after the soft capp that aint shit.
What? Try structuring a sentence.
Originally posted by Mr. Likable
Chemistry only affects team game play by 9% max. I read that in the forums from Bort.lol 9%..its cumalative..because if it was only 9% max their wouldnt be much difference between 100 chem team and 10 chem team at 25 +..12.5 points and thats if the team is equal after the soft capp that aint shit.
What? Try structuring a sentence.
socialistduck
offline
offline
Apparently Bort is wrong, because my team kicked the shit out of an equal team with shitty team chemistry... or my team is underrated. Flappin Heads, remember last season?! ;-)
TheRooster
offline
offline
Originally posted by socialistduck
Apparently Bort is wrong, because my team kicked the shit out of an equal team with shitty team chemistry... or my team is underrated. Flappin Heads, remember last season?! ;-)
Yeah, our chemistry was 10 if I remmeber AND we were experimenting with tactics, like 80% to the TE. I'm sure the tactics had more to do with it, but Chemistry I'm sure did as well. But as soon as we got back over 20 and out of the red, our performance seemed to get back to normal.
And kicked the shit out of isn't how I would describe a 1 point victory.
Oh, and we outleveld you by about 2 levels on average, so formulate that into the theory as well.
Apparently Bort is wrong, because my team kicked the shit out of an equal team with shitty team chemistry... or my team is underrated. Flappin Heads, remember last season?! ;-)
Yeah, our chemistry was 10 if I remmeber AND we were experimenting with tactics, like 80% to the TE. I'm sure the tactics had more to do with it, but Chemistry I'm sure did as well. But as soon as we got back over 20 and out of the red, our performance seemed to get back to normal.
And kicked the shit out of isn't how I would describe a 1 point victory.
Oh, and we outleveld you by about 2 levels on average, so formulate that into the theory as well.
Last edited Aug 6, 2008 06:24:58
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
