...
cooljesture20
offline
offline
No but seriously, anybody here have a formula for Power Rankings and want to throw some together?
Garidan
offline
offline
Okay, I put one together (cuz I was bored and curious). Doubt I'll ever do anything like this again, especially because stats become more useful than weighted levels.. Hope someone finds it interesting. 
Methodology used for the weighted average: For teams that have 40 or more human players, I used the average level of a human player. For teams without 40 human players, I added as many players as needed to get a team to 40 players, using half the level of the average CPU on that team.
There are a lot of variables I'm not accounting for, but this is just a rough guide anyways.
ALPHA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Istanbul Snakes 0 45 10.33 10.33 10.33
2 Minnesota Warriors 1 43 9.28 9.11 9.28
3 The Dark Knights 7 40 8.98 8.62 8.98
4 Rotterdam Rampage 1 43 8.88 8.75 8.88
5 Chernobyl Disaster 0 41 8.68 8.68 8.68
6 Krakow Krakodiles 22 28 9.07 8.2 7.41
7 Romanian Roadhouse Rowdies 0 38 7.79 7.79 7.4
8 East Berlin Blitzkrieg 0 48 7.02 7.02 7.02
9 Green Bay Cheese Heads 45 21 10.67 7.02 6.86
10 Moscow Red Army 8 36 6.86 7.23 6.62
11 Nizhny Novgorod Bulldogs 32 20 8.05 6.15 5.27
12 Minsk Fire 45 15 8.87 6.37 5.05
13 Liverpool Poison 22 40 5.05 5.59 5.05
14 Chernobyl CHUDS 38 18 6.67 6 4.56
15 Diaper Vipers 43 6 9.17 5.86 3.67
16 Texas City Storm 43 7 3.71 5.3 2.94
ZETA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Sofia Falcons 2 40 11.63 11.31 11.63
2 Hungary Hungry Hippos 14 42 11.05 9.14 11.05
3 Belgrade Bears 0 44 9.36 9.36 9.36
4 Brown Bay Packers 6 30 10.9 10.42 9.18
5 Boston Piggers 13 32 9.81 7.6 8.07
6 Spanish Inquisition 36 31 9.13 7.47 7.75
7 Barcelona Chupacabras 0 60 6.8 6.8 6.8
8 Olympic Lions 18 34 7.24 7.31 6.71
9 Kiev Blazers 45 22 10.32 6.1 6.59
10 Odessa Pipers 23 18 9.89 8.27 6.38
11 Macedonian Phalanx 11 31 6.77 6.95 6.09
12 UN determined 27 17 8.88 7.68 5.77
13 Crete Minotaurs 31 19 8.26 6.88 5.51
14 Bergen Storm 33 21 7.24 5.8 4.96
15 Moscow Maniacs 40 10 9.6 5.86 4.25
16 New Orleans Jazz 45 0 0 5.16 2.58

Methodology used for the weighted average: For teams that have 40 or more human players, I used the average level of a human player. For teams without 40 human players, I added as many players as needed to get a team to 40 players, using half the level of the average CPU on that team.
There are a lot of variables I'm not accounting for, but this is just a rough guide anyways.
ALPHA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Istanbul Snakes 0 45 10.33 10.33 10.33
2 Minnesota Warriors 1 43 9.28 9.11 9.28
3 The Dark Knights 7 40 8.98 8.62 8.98
4 Rotterdam Rampage 1 43 8.88 8.75 8.88
5 Chernobyl Disaster 0 41 8.68 8.68 8.68
6 Krakow Krakodiles 22 28 9.07 8.2 7.41
7 Romanian Roadhouse Rowdies 0 38 7.79 7.79 7.4
8 East Berlin Blitzkrieg 0 48 7.02 7.02 7.02
9 Green Bay Cheese Heads 45 21 10.67 7.02 6.86
10 Moscow Red Army 8 36 6.86 7.23 6.62
11 Nizhny Novgorod Bulldogs 32 20 8.05 6.15 5.27
12 Minsk Fire 45 15 8.87 6.37 5.05
13 Liverpool Poison 22 40 5.05 5.59 5.05
14 Chernobyl CHUDS 38 18 6.67 6 4.56
15 Diaper Vipers 43 6 9.17 5.86 3.67
16 Texas City Storm 43 7 3.71 5.3 2.94
ZETA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Sofia Falcons 2 40 11.63 11.31 11.63
2 Hungary Hungry Hippos 14 42 11.05 9.14 11.05
3 Belgrade Bears 0 44 9.36 9.36 9.36
4 Brown Bay Packers 6 30 10.9 10.42 9.18
5 Boston Piggers 13 32 9.81 7.6 8.07
6 Spanish Inquisition 36 31 9.13 7.47 7.75
7 Barcelona Chupacabras 0 60 6.8 6.8 6.8
8 Olympic Lions 18 34 7.24 7.31 6.71
9 Kiev Blazers 45 22 10.32 6.1 6.59
10 Odessa Pipers 23 18 9.89 8.27 6.38
11 Macedonian Phalanx 11 31 6.77 6.95 6.09
12 UN determined 27 17 8.88 7.68 5.77
13 Crete Minotaurs 31 19 8.26 6.88 5.51
14 Bergen Storm 33 21 7.24 5.8 4.96
15 Moscow Maniacs 40 10 9.6 5.86 4.25
16 New Orleans Jazz 45 0 0 5.16 2.58
naraic
offline
offline
Originally posted by cooljesture20
No but seriously, anybody here have a formula for Power Rankings and want to throw some together?
most of the formulas out there are stat based so won't work well for a few weeks
No but seriously, anybody here have a formula for Power Rankings and want to throw some together?
most of the formulas out there are stat based so won't work well for a few weeks
nevthomas
offline
offline
Garidan,
Nice work pulling it together based on another team I am on here is how the conf worked out the power rankings if someone is going to do it...
_____________________________________
Originally posted by Waltang
The ranking is comprised of 3 numbers.
The first is a culmination of record and Strength of schedule. Its forumula is :
RecordValue = (#ofWins x 1.5)+(#ofWins x WinStrength)+(#ofLosses x LossStrength)
where
WinStrengh = ((Total Wins of all opponents that team has beat)/(Total Games Played of all opponents that team has beat)) | (0 if team has not won)
LossStrengh = ((Total Wins of all opponents that team has Lost to)/(Total Games Played of all opponents that team has Lost to))| (1 if undefeated)
The second Value is for Margin of Victory. Its forumla is :
VictoryValue = (AverageMarginofVictory^1)/35 x (#ofWins/#ofGames)*Weekweight
Weekweight = #ofGames * .3 - This keeps the relative value of of margin of victory relatively consistant as the # of games increases.
DefeatValue = (AverageMarginofDefeat^1)/35 x (#ofLosses/#ofGames)*Weekweight*-1
^1 Margin of Victory and Defeats for any single game is limited to 35 points. Blowouts by more than that are as much morale based as actual skill based, so limited to this for powerrankign purposes.
Ranking = RecordValue + VictoryValue + DefeatValue
Nice work pulling it together based on another team I am on here is how the conf worked out the power rankings if someone is going to do it...
_____________________________________
Originally posted by Waltang
The ranking is comprised of 3 numbers.
The first is a culmination of record and Strength of schedule. Its forumula is :
RecordValue = (#ofWins x 1.5)+(#ofWins x WinStrength)+(#ofLosses x LossStrength)
where
WinStrengh = ((Total Wins of all opponents that team has beat)/(Total Games Played of all opponents that team has beat)) | (0 if team has not won)
LossStrengh = ((Total Wins of all opponents that team has Lost to)/(Total Games Played of all opponents that team has Lost to))| (1 if undefeated)
The second Value is for Margin of Victory. Its forumla is :
VictoryValue = (AverageMarginofVictory^1)/35 x (#ofWins/#ofGames)*Weekweight
Weekweight = #ofGames * .3 - This keeps the relative value of of margin of victory relatively consistant as the # of games increases.
DefeatValue = (AverageMarginofDefeat^1)/35 x (#ofLosses/#ofGames)*Weekweight*-1
^1 Margin of Victory and Defeats for any single game is limited to 35 points. Blowouts by more than that are as much morale based as actual skill based, so limited to this for powerrankign purposes.
Ranking = RecordValue + VictoryValue + DefeatValue
Cactus71
offline
offline
Originally posted by Garidan
Okay, I put one together (cuz I was bored and curious). Doubt I'll ever do anything like this again, especially because stats become more useful than weighted levels.. Hope someone finds it interesting.
Methodology used for the weighted average: For teams that have 40 or more human players, I used the average level of a human player. For teams without 40 human players, I added as many players as needed to get a team to 40 players, using half the level of the average CPU on that team.
There are a lot of variables I'm not accounting for, but this is just a rough guide anyways.
ALPHA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Istanbul Snakes 0 45 10.33 10.33 10.33
2 Minnesota Warriors 1 43 9.28 9.11 9.28
3 The Dark Knights 7 40 8.98 8.62 8.98
4 Rotterdam Rampage 1 43 8.88 8.75 8.88
5 Chernobyl Disaster 0 41 8.68 8.68 8.68
6 Krakow Krakodiles 22 28 9.07 8.2 7.41
7 Romanian Roadhouse Rowdies 0 38 7.79 7.79 7.4
8 East Berlin Blitzkrieg 0 48 7.02 7.02 7.02
9 Green Bay Cheese Heads 45 21 10.67 7.02 6.86
10 Moscow Red Army 8 36 6.86 7.23 6.62
11 Nizhny Novgorod Bulldogs 32 20 8.05 6.15 5.27
12 Minsk Fire 45 15 8.87 6.37 5.05
13 Liverpool Poison 22 40 5.05 5.59 5.05
14 Chernobyl CHUDS 38 18 6.67 6 4.56
15 Diaper Vipers 43 6 9.17 5.86 3.67
16 Texas City Storm 43 7 3.71 5.3 2.94
ZETA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Sofia Falcons 2 40 11.63 11.31 11.63
2 Hungary Hungry Hippos 14 42 11.05 9.14 11.05
3 Belgrade Bears 0 44 9.36 9.36 9.36
4 Brown Bay Packers 6 30 10.9 10.42 9.18
5 Boston Piggers 13 32 9.81 7.6 8.07
6 Spanish Inquisition 36 31 9.13 7.47 7.75
7 Barcelona Chupacabras 0 60 6.8 6.8 6.8
8 Olympic Lions 18 34 7.24 7.31 6.71
9 Kiev Blazers 45 22 10.32 6.1 6.59
10 Odessa Pipers 23 18 9.89 8.27 6.38
11 Macedonian Phalanx 11 31 6.77 6.95 6.09
12 UN determined 27 17 8.88 7.68 5.77
13 Crete Minotaurs 31 19 8.26 6.88 5.51
14 Bergen Storm 33 21 7.24 5.8 4.96
15 Moscow Maniacs 40 10 9.6 5.86 4.25
16 New Orleans Jazz 45 0 0 5.16 2.58
good rankings but lol of course you would but snakes #1 you GM them
Okay, I put one together (cuz I was bored and curious). Doubt I'll ever do anything like this again, especially because stats become more useful than weighted levels.. Hope someone finds it interesting.

Methodology used for the weighted average: For teams that have 40 or more human players, I used the average level of a human player. For teams without 40 human players, I added as many players as needed to get a team to 40 players, using half the level of the average CPU on that team.
There are a lot of variables I'm not accounting for, but this is just a rough guide anyways.
ALPHA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Istanbul Snakes 0 45 10.33 10.33 10.33
2 Minnesota Warriors 1 43 9.28 9.11 9.28
3 The Dark Knights 7 40 8.98 8.62 8.98
4 Rotterdam Rampage 1 43 8.88 8.75 8.88
5 Chernobyl Disaster 0 41 8.68 8.68 8.68
6 Krakow Krakodiles 22 28 9.07 8.2 7.41
7 Romanian Roadhouse Rowdies 0 38 7.79 7.79 7.4
8 East Berlin Blitzkrieg 0 48 7.02 7.02 7.02
9 Green Bay Cheese Heads 45 21 10.67 7.02 6.86
10 Moscow Red Army 8 36 6.86 7.23 6.62
11 Nizhny Novgorod Bulldogs 32 20 8.05 6.15 5.27
12 Minsk Fire 45 15 8.87 6.37 5.05
13 Liverpool Poison 22 40 5.05 5.59 5.05
14 Chernobyl CHUDS 38 18 6.67 6 4.56
15 Diaper Vipers 43 6 9.17 5.86 3.67
16 Texas City Storm 43 7 3.71 5.3 2.94
ZETA CONFERENCE:
Name CPU Human HumanAv wCPUAv Weighted Av
1 Sofia Falcons 2 40 11.63 11.31 11.63
2 Hungary Hungry Hippos 14 42 11.05 9.14 11.05
3 Belgrade Bears 0 44 9.36 9.36 9.36
4 Brown Bay Packers 6 30 10.9 10.42 9.18
5 Boston Piggers 13 32 9.81 7.6 8.07
6 Spanish Inquisition 36 31 9.13 7.47 7.75
7 Barcelona Chupacabras 0 60 6.8 6.8 6.8
8 Olympic Lions 18 34 7.24 7.31 6.71
9 Kiev Blazers 45 22 10.32 6.1 6.59
10 Odessa Pipers 23 18 9.89 8.27 6.38
11 Macedonian Phalanx 11 31 6.77 6.95 6.09
12 UN determined 27 17 8.88 7.68 5.77
13 Crete Minotaurs 31 19 8.26 6.88 5.51
14 Bergen Storm 33 21 7.24 5.8 4.96
15 Moscow Maniacs 40 10 9.6 5.86 4.25
16 New Orleans Jazz 45 0 0 5.16 2.58
good rankings but lol of course you would but snakes #1 you GM them
BigCowboysFan
offline
offline
I actually have a formula/spreadsheet that I use for South America Pro League where I GM a team over there. It also has a page that does predictions each game as well. I could plug those in for this league if you'd like.
pats4892
offline
offline
I know this is off topic, but do we get income from tickets and concessions for scrimmage games?
naraic
offline
offline
Originally posted by pats4892
I know this is off topic, but do we get income from tickets and concessions for scrimmage games?
no
I know this is off topic, but do we get income from tickets and concessions for scrimmage games?
no
Garidan
offline
offline
Congrats to the Rotterdam Rampage, who scored the first big upset, at least according to the now-outdated rankings above. Certainly a team to keep an eye out for.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























