Warrior General Games

1) Zambia Lions - (12-2) - 71.40 (1, 70.91)
2) South African Ridgebacks - (13-1) - 71.17 (2, 70.71)
3) Buckeye Nation - (13-1) - 63.54 (3, 63.19)
4) Mombasa Spears - (10-4) - 57.54 (5, 56.26)
5) Valla Beach Woolsheds - (10-4) - 51.99 (4, 56.97)
6) Zimbabwe Headhunters - (9-5) - 49.09 (6, 52.00)
7) Windhoek White Rhinos - (10-4) - 48.99 (7, 48.45)
8) Oum-Chalouba Zebras - (7-7) - 40.66 (8, 37.94)
9) Niger Mambas - (7-7) - 34.94 (10, 32.79)
10) Cape Town Billievers - (6-8) - 33.66 (9, 35.15)
11) Carthaginian Horde - (2-12) - 23.63 (12, 24.15)
12) Calurnet Wolverines - (4-10) - 23.21 (11, 24.49)
13) Nairobi Warthogs - (3-11) - 22.33 (13, 23.54)
14) Kalahari Vikings - (3-11) - 20.48 (15, 17.77)
15) Madagascar Mobsters - (3-11) - 18.14 (14, 29.19)
16) Malawi Pride - (0-14) - 8.49 (16, 8.82)

*Note: I utilized the Oberon Mt. Power Rating Forumla that allocates 60% to Average Score, 20% to the combination of Highest & Lowest Scores, and 20% to Winning Percentage.

Windhoek is top 5 IMO. Great run they're on.

Sshhhhhhhhhhhh ..... we are trying to fly in under the radar.. but thanks for the comment. we dont run up the score like some teams and thats why i believe we arent higher, formula doesnt take into account points against...

Originally posted by Billy White
Sshhhhhhhhhhhh ..... we are trying to fly in under the radar.. but thanks for the comment. we dont run up the score like some teams and thats why i believe we arent higher, formula doesnt take into account points against...

i dont really think teams run up scores (except lions but we cant control how we score). Your low cuz you have 4 losses and dont score alot. IMO i think you guys are 3rd best team

Originally posted by FLGator
1) Zambia Lions - (12-2) - 71.40 (1, 70.91)
2) South African Ridgebacks - (13-1) - 71.17 (2, 70.71)
3) Buckeye Nation - (13-1) - 63.54 (3, 63.19)
4) Mombasa Spears - (10-4) - 57.54 (5, 56.26)
5) Valla Beach Woolsheds - (10-4) - 51.99 (4, 56.97)
6) Zimbabwe Headhunters - (9-5) - 49.09 (6, 52.00)
7) Windhoek White Rhinos - (10-4) - 48.99 (7, 48.45)
8) Oum-Chalouba Zebras - (7-7) - 40.66 (8, 37.94)
9) Niger Mambas - (7-7) - 34.94 (10, 32.79)
10) Cape Town Billievers - (6-8) - 33.66 (9, 35.15)
11) Carthaginian Horde - (2-12) - 23.63 (12, 24.15)
12) Calurnet Wolverines - (4-10) - 23.21 (11, 24.49)
13) Nairobi Warthogs - (3-11) - 22.33 (13, 23.54)
14) Kalahari Vikings - (3-11) - 20.48 (15, 17.77)
15) Madagascar Mobsters - (3-11) - 18.14 (14, 29.19)
16) Malawi Pride - (0-14) - 8.49 (16, 8.82)

*Note: I utilized the Oberon Mt. Power Rating Forumla that allocates 60% to Average Score, 20% to the combination of Highest & Lowest Scores, and 20% to Winning Percentage.

i still hate this thing it makes know cents i mean a 2-12 above 4 teams with a higher record. You should start making them with your opinion

Originally posted by gfnate
i still hate this thing it makes know cents i mean a 2-12 above 4 teams with a higher record. You should start making them with your opinion

Do you know what makes no sense? Your sentences. I understand you're my teammate, but to use the words "know cents" when "no sense" are appropriate is close to unacceptable. It could only be worse if you threw "dizzle" into your sentence somewhere.

I'll agree that the formula isn't perfect, in fact it's far from it. However, it is a formula with calculated results...which doesn't take into account my opinion. If it did, the Lions (at 12-2) would fall behind the one-loss Ridgebacks and Buckeye Nation.

Power Rankings should take into account more recent events/wins. the formula needs modification IMO. Heavily factor in recent Wins/Losses.

If we went by records, it would just look like the standings

fo shizzle my dizzle

Ok, I know I don't talk much but how the hell can the Horde move up for losing. I am kinda puzzled and happy at the same time.

Originally posted by ntemans
Ok, I know I don't talk much but how the hell can the Horde move up for losing. I am kinda puzzled and happy at the same time.
They score more points than those below them... And that's the way power rankings work.

And I am with you guys who say, that it needs a little modification. Untill then, I am ok with it - as long as we lead the conference, power ranking is not bothering me!

Originally posted by FLGator
Originally posted by gfnate

i still hate this thing it makes know cents i mean a 2-12 above 4 teams with a higher record. You should start making them with your opinion

Do you know what makes no sense? Your sentences. I understand you're my teammate, but to use the words "know cents" when "no sense" are appropriate is close to unacceptable. It could only be worse if you threw "dizzle" into your sentence somewhere.

I'll agree that the formula isn't perfect, in fact it's far from it. However, it is a formula with calculated results...which doesn't take into account my opinion. If it did, the Lions (at 12-2) would fall behind the one-loss Ridgebacks and Buckeye Nation.


gator calm down i am just saying you should make the power rankings with your own opinion. The know cents thing was a joke because it doesn't make sense. This thing is dumb that is all i am saying it makes no sense how some of those teams are where they are.

This thing only calculates who can score the most on the bad teams not who beat who. Once again im not attacking you i just think this power ranking system is silly.

Originally posted by FLGator
Originally posted by gfnate

...which doesn't take into account my opinion. If it did, the Lions (at 12-2) would fall behind the one-loss Ridgebacks and Buckeye Nation.


You are correct on the grammar but poor show for playing School Master...
Otherwise I agree, we should be behind the one loss teams.

Just in case people didn't catch it. I said know cents because it doesn't make any sense. Lol it was a joke

I wish it ranked us lower then 6! I'm thinking 12 or 13ish...

11 is my spot, you cant have it, its all mine until next season. LOL