Thanks for anyone participating.
Bort acknowledged the results and looks like we are heading for a change this upcoming offseason.
Bort acknowledged the results and looks like we are heading for a change this upcoming offseason.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Bringing up league structure again
Out of 17 people, 83% preferred a 24 team/2 Pro league format with the winners playing day 40 for a title.
https://ibb.co/1qwvdqZ
5 people which selected Option B: 24/2 Pro league format provided following feedback
If Option B is the prefered one: Any suggestions to be considered? - number of playoff teams- promotions/demotions- conference alignments (Static/dynamic)- team placement rules (rules for multiple own teams) 5 responses tag teams owned by a network and put them in different leagues / conference-
Keep 12TM leagues. These people asking for 32 team leagues don't know what they are talking about.
-It's very important that the Pro teams are dynamic (randomize each season). 1 season toughest conference can't be a permanent pergatory. Rivalries will still exist just as much between the 24 Pro teams in 2 leagues, it is fine.-It would be a HUGE upgrade if we could ban team swaps within the same tier (no changes between leagues/conferences in Pro). RC is correct that new system incentivizes him and others to have 4 teams, one in each conference. By allowing conference swaps you give an advantage to networks with multiple teams not having to face each other in the early playoffs, and incentivizing having a team in every conference. Should be randomized then no changes. (only league swaps allowed are between tiers like AA to Pro).-I am still personally a big fan of 3 teams make the playoffs per conference (1 bye), 4th team stays in Pro, 5th/6th team demote. That's a pretty big change so I doubt you get the votes. But no reason this "new" system has to have 16 playoff teams total, as 12 teams would be sufficient. Having a bye week added and only 3 teams per conference make playoffs would make the regular season matter more.
As-is, people are going to coast to the playoffs as the #4 seed since seeding completely does not matter in any way, which is stupid. Doing this removes the incentive for top tier teams to gameplan AT ALL for regular season games by making it too easy to make the playoffs with zero incentive to be the #1 seed... Dynamic conferences, No Switches
I'll never win so I really don't care
The current concept version looks fine to me.
https://ibb.co/1qwvdqZ
5 people which selected Option B: 24/2 Pro league format provided following feedback
If Option B is the prefered one: Any suggestions to be considered? - number of playoff teams- promotions/demotions- conference alignments (Static/dynamic)- team placement rules (rules for multiple own teams) 5 responses tag teams owned by a network and put them in different leagues / conference-
Keep 12TM leagues. These people asking for 32 team leagues don't know what they are talking about.
-It's very important that the Pro teams are dynamic (randomize each season). 1 season toughest conference can't be a permanent pergatory. Rivalries will still exist just as much between the 24 Pro teams in 2 leagues, it is fine.-It would be a HUGE upgrade if we could ban team swaps within the same tier (no changes between leagues/conferences in Pro). RC is correct that new system incentivizes him and others to have 4 teams, one in each conference. By allowing conference swaps you give an advantage to networks with multiple teams not having to face each other in the early playoffs, and incentivizing having a team in every conference. Should be randomized then no changes. (only league swaps allowed are between tiers like AA to Pro).-I am still personally a big fan of 3 teams make the playoffs per conference (1 bye), 4th team stays in Pro, 5th/6th team demote. That's a pretty big change so I doubt you get the votes. But no reason this "new" system has to have 16 playoff teams total, as 12 teams would be sufficient. Having a bye week added and only 3 teams per conference make playoffs would make the regular season matter more.
As-is, people are going to coast to the playoffs as the #4 seed since seeding completely does not matter in any way, which is stupid. Doing this removes the incentive for top tier teams to gameplan AT ALL for regular season games by making it too easy to make the playoffs with zero incentive to be the #1 seed... Dynamic conferences, No Switches
I'll never win so I really don't care
The current concept version looks fine to me.
If the same concept shall be implemented for AAA and AA, their playoffs have to start 2 days earlier as well.
This gives people the chance to reach the highest level within 200 days. (Minors+AA season promotion)
Therefore, the two top leagues next season will then be built based on:
- The current 12 CL teams (congrats on non demoting)
- The 8 Pro playoff teams
- The 4 AAA promoters (AAA conf champs)
After next season, it will be an 8 team rotation between all leagues in promotion/demotion process
This gives people the chance to reach the highest level within 200 days. (Minors+AA season promotion)
Therefore, the two top leagues next season will then be built based on:
- The current 12 CL teams (congrats on non demoting)
- The 8 Pro playoff teams
- The 4 AAA promoters (AAA conf champs)
After next season, it will be an 8 team rotation between all leagues in promotion/demotion process
Edited by Tomcic on Sep 2, 2024 09:26:37
Pwned
online
online
Sounds exciting. We can get some polls going again! Would be sweet to revive the Coaches' Poll.
So…. Only people who really gotta try the rest of this seasons playoffs is AAA teams?
Originally posted by Koowahn
So…. Only people who really gotta try the rest of this seasons playoffs is AAA teams?
There is still a CL title to be played for lol. And yes, AAA of course
So…. Only people who really gotta try the rest of this seasons playoffs is AAA teams?
There is still a CL title to be played for lol. And yes, AAA of course
Originally posted by Tomcic
There is still a CL title to be played for lol. And yes, AAA of course
Ehh, I guess being the “last” CL champ is worth trying for.
There is still a CL title to be played for lol. And yes, AAA of course
Ehh, I guess being the “last” CL champ is worth trying for.
VenomCoach
offline
offline
nice work man. IMO the more people at the top level the more activity we get, the better the game is.
TJ Spikes
offline
offline
I can't believe the ghost of WL is actually gone.
Now we just need the old names back.
Now we just need the old names back.
Craw33
offline
offline
Originally posted by Tomcic
If the same concept shall be implemented for AAA and AA, their playoffs have to start 2 days earlier as well.
This gives people the chance to reach the highest level within 200 days. (Minors+AA season promotion)
Therefore, the two top leagues next season will then be built based on:
- The current 12 CL teams (congrats on non demoting)
- The 8 Pro playoff teams
- The 4 AAA promoters (AAA conf champs)
After next season, it will be an 8 team rotation between all leagues in promotion/demotion process
So this information was incorrect?
If the same concept shall be implemented for AAA and AA, their playoffs have to start 2 days earlier as well.
This gives people the chance to reach the highest level within 200 days. (Minors+AA season promotion)
Therefore, the two top leagues next season will then be built based on:
- The current 12 CL teams (congrats on non demoting)
- The 8 Pro playoff teams
- The 4 AAA promoters (AAA conf champs)
After next season, it will be an 8 team rotation between all leagues in promotion/demotion process
So this information was incorrect?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
