User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > How many VP's should future dots get?
Page:
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Though VXP / VA's wasn't explicitly mentioned in the announcement, the prevailing thought is we will now all end up with 72 VP's (without having to do funny boost stuff to maximize them). This is a big improvement so I don't end up with 66 VP dots anymore!

My question to the community is... WHY 72?

In my opinion, at the very least, 75 (being devisable by 15) makes more sense than 72.

But also, as a low-impact addition to make new dots a little cooler than old dots, why not 90 VP's to allow players to get 6 full VA's at Plateau?

Pro's of 90 VP's
-Minimal net sim/balance impact since most of the 6th VA's for positions are not going to be the most powerful
-More underused/fringe VA's actually get to be used to allow more strategy
-Makes the new dots seem a little new/cool
-More points to spend
 
King of Bling
offline
Link
 
+1
 
Kurt Davey
online
Link
 
Originally posted by King of Bling
+1


 
Kegergator
online
Link
 
Yes please
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
I am curious which user will be the first to come in this thread and call me a heretic, since 72 is the perfect magical number.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
72-90

anywhere in that range is fine with me
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
75, I like the number.
 
BigRatUno
offline
Link
 

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
75, I like the number.


75 would be great because of 5 x 15 = 75,
but 76 would be greater because of (5 x 15)+1 = 76, for those +1 VAs some use like OTK or Slow starter
 
slughead42
Don't panic!
offline
Link
 
Daedalus prefers 76,000, because that's how many he had on that super-annuated FS.
 
King of Bling
offline
Link
 
75 would be nice, 90 would be killer, 91 ...the bomb!
 
madmal
Prez SWO
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by King of Bling
75 would be nice, 90 would be killer, 91 ...the bomb!


+1
 
Bucky1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by King of Bling
75 would be nice, 90 would be killer, 91 ...the bomb!


+1

72 never made any sense to me.

 
TJ Spikes
offline
Link
 
Fwiw, I always thought 15 max per VA was a bit odd. SAs are 10.

You actually only earn 70 VPs, and get 2 bonus when you first hit L25. Getting 5 bonus VPs, instead of 2, doesn't seem like it would be game breaking .

 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TJ Spikes
Fwiw, I always thought 15 max per VA was a bit odd. SAs are 10.

You actually only earn 70 VPs, and get 2 bonus when you first hit L25. Getting 5 bonus VPs, instead of 2, doesn't seem like it would be game breaking .



I think that number came about as a combination of desired %'s and a desire to limit how many VA's you could have. Did you notice that it's roughly the same number of VA's as there are SA's in the archetype SA trees? Unless you spread out your VP's lower then 6 is what you end up with. And a 75% bonus is the best you can get with smaller bonuses also... same as SA's (5%, 3%, and 2%).
Because of that I think Bort will stick to that ideal he originally had. However it works, I think those things remain the same.
 
RyanCane26
offline
Link
 
Am I reading announcement correct that it is unlimited VPs now? 68 by plateau and 81 by end of first plateau season?
Edited by RyanCane26 on Jun 14, 2023 09:23:38
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.