User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Most Interceptions thrown in a game?
Page:
 
ThePh33P
offline
Link
 
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/836247/box_score

21 Interceptions thrown

13 by the cpu team and 8 by the blue knights.

Blue knights builds are all open but to save some time. The LB/CB have 35 Intercepting and Gold EOTP the S have 30 Intercepting with no EOTP

Poison are CPU.

Zone - 16

Man - 5
Edited by ThePh33P on Jan 2, 2022 15:51:29
Edited by ThePh33P on Jan 2, 2022 15:51:01
Edited by ThePh33P on Jan 2, 2022 15:48:28
 
Bretto007
offline
Link
 
The interceptions have been out of control.

Devs-Please decrease INTs.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Bretto007
The interceptions have been out of control.

Devs-Please decrease INTs.


One game doesn't equal the entirety of GLB2...isn't this vs the CPU anyways? I mean shit, we get guys who can pile up 40 rev cakes in a game vs cpu, or how many broken tackles with power backs vs cpu, tons of sacks, FF, etc etc. I could go on.
Edited by Myrik_Justiciar on Jan 2, 2022 19:27:48
 
ThePh33P
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
One game doesn't equal the entirety of GLB2...isn't this vs the CPU anyways? I mean shit, we get guys who can pile up 40 rev cakes in a game vs cpu, or how many broken tackles with power backs vs cpu, tons of sacks, FF, etc etc. I could go on.


if you break down the game per play Man has a near equal int rate
 
Bretto007
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
One game doesn't equal the entirety of GLB2...isn't this vs the CPU anyways? I mean shit, we get guys who can pile up 40 rev cakes in a game vs cpu, or how many broken tackles with power backs vs cpu, tons of sacks, FF, etc etc. I could go on.


It's not just one game and against the CPU. It's every game. Do you not pay attention?
 
Rob.
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
One game doesn't equal the entirety of GLB2...isn't this vs the CPU anyways? I mean shit, we get guys who can pile up 40 rev cakes in a game vs cpu, or how many broken tackles with power backs vs cpu, tons of sacks, FF, etc etc. I could go on.


I love you man, but you are clearly biased here.
 
Ghanima
offline
Link
 
There are no ints if U play smart. Thats it. Adjust improve overcome. Stop complaining about ints. Change ur playbooks.
 
Cybertron
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ghanima
There are no ints if U play smart. Thats it. Adjust improve overcome. Stop complaining about ints. Change ur playbooks.


Seriously...man is WAY more OP than zone.
 
Link
 

I haven't seen in any of the patch notes where Int rates were buffed. I know if I'm gonna have a good defensive game, I'll prob average 3 but I'm built to get TOs running Zone. A better question might be why does Man get nearly as many Ints as Zone when it has SAs directed at winning CIT rolls vs EotP that does give an Int boost.

But I digress, his example is vs the CPU. I had a game vs the cpu where I got over 173 rev cakes as a team and no one batted an eye.
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/837431

Originally posted by Rob.
I love you man, but you are clearly biased here.


Rob, you're the best, but I just disagree. There has been a lot of zone hate on here since you've been gone.


Originally posted by Bretto007
It's not just one game and against the CPU. It's every game. Do you not pay attention?


Yeah the examples I get thrown at me are games where one team throws the ball 90+ times and the other throws it 70+ times resulting in alot (what do you expect with 160+ attempts), then games where one team throws 2 and the other 3 or 4 (which seems ok to me, IMO).

Its the same argument that keeps getting brought up, its like you all want go back to the old days when Ints were scarce or just have 500+ yard passing games with very little risk. Passing has already been buffed a lot over the past few changelogs, pass arc, AU, TTN, etc.
 
ThePh33P
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
Yeah the examples I get thrown at me are games where one team throws the ball 90+ times and the other throws it 70+ times resulting in alot (what do you expect with 160+ attempts), then games where one team throws 2 and the other 3 or 4 (which seems ok to me, IMO).

Its the same argument that keeps getting brought up, its like you all want go back to the old days when Ints were scarce or just have 500+ yard passing games with very little risk. Passing has already been buffed a lot over the past few changelogs, pass arc, AU, TTN, etc.


That's not a CPU team and that team has 2 Centers and no other offensive lineman. So it's not exactly a fair comparison
 
Bretto007
offline
Link
 
Everyone is running zone now because the INTs are too easy.

I'll say this for one of the last times on here-

I'm here because this is a football game. No other reason. The vast majority of people on here are here because it is a football game. Corndog will occasionally jump on here and tell people this isn't an football simulation game. Which is bullshit. If it wasn't a football simulation game no one would fricking be here. People aren't on here to just support warrior games. People pay money on here because it is a football game. As such the game needs to resemble actual football. The goal of the developers with this game should be to keep making updates so that it achieves the goal of accurately depicting football.

Every decision on here should fundamentally come back to the same question. Does this move the game in a more accurate direction of the real game of football? The vet and pro tiers of the game should be the equivalent of actual NFL football games.

If the goal is to not make this game resemble the actual game of football then I am out and most other people will too.

Having said all that- DO NOT DO THE CLASSIC MYRIK THING OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT. Yes there are other things that need to be changed to enhance the realism of the game but this thread is about how absurd the interceptions are happening in this game compared to the actual game of football.

At the worst of it an NFL team would be throwing ONE INT per 30-40 attempts. The INT numbers we see now blow that out of the water.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/interceptions-thrown-per-game

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-attempts-per-game

 
dlcurt
offline
Link
 
I think we all agree the number of interceptions are too much at the moment in both man and zone. Wait for a couple of seasons, see how the new pass changes affect the game before we go crazy (Nods to Ellix for reminding me this comment
Edited by dlcurt on Jan 3, 2022 18:29:31
 
dredgar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dlcurt
I think we all agree the number of interceptions are too much at the moment in both man and zone. Wait for a couple of seasons, see how the new pass changes affect the game before we go crazy (Nods to Ellix for reminding me this comment


Myrik doesn't agree 🤣🤣🤣🤣.

With the changes I feel one on one coverage is getting exposed a but more than it used to, but looks like getting qh pressure effects the QB more as well.
 
Bretto007
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dlcurt
I think we all agree the number of interceptions are too much at the moment in both man and zone.


Bingo.

 
Link
 

Originally posted by Bretto007


Having said all that- DO NOT DO THE CLASSIC MYRIK THING OF CHANGING THE SUBJECT. Yes there are other things that need to be changed to enhance the realism of the game but this thread is about how absurd the interceptions are happening in this game compared to the actual game of football.



I wasn't trying to change the subject, I was making a comparison of silly stats vs cpu/inactive teams and saying those games don't matter.


Originally posted by Bretto007
At the worst of it an NFL team would be throwing ONE INT per 30-40 attempts. The INT numbers we see now blow that out of the water.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/interceptions-thrown-per-game

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-attempts-per-game



Amazing how the "IRL" argument gets tossed around only when it comes to the things y'all want changed, but not other areas you all are fine with despite them not being "realistic" either
Edited by Myrik_Justiciar on Jan 3, 2022 22:45:21
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.