Originally posted by TJ Spikes
The question will be: does the dual threat force the defense to do something different. If the QB did nothing but opened up the rFB for 200+ yards and a few TDs, that's still a win.
It should be interesting to see how it plays out.
True that, and also like this:
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=3063563&pbp_id=1202209
it seems like ppl are forgetting we are talking about a QB here, not a running back
I guess anyone watching that game who doesn't know the history between us and Alabama would find a lot of the play-calling from both sides to be confusing, but that is because these teams know each other so well, both teams really tried to take away things from the other offense while the offenses on the other hand was trying to take advantage of that. In fact, even though we were almost sure Bama was going to plan to take away the outside run and therefore we were best off attacking behind the OT and passing to the outside, we still did not drop the outside runs all the way to 0% because had they played differently and left some openings for that to be successful, the AI would have responded. When it comes down to it, you find where you have the best chance to run and go for it, and you find where you can get your receivers one-on-one in space. If you can do this better than the opponent and execute well, you can succeed. That's football.
Originally posted by reddogrw
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3057556
one game gave him 37 of his 101 total TD's
no CPU's in WL
37 TDs in one game still means she averaged over 4 TDs a game in all the rest. Not sure you did anything but lessen whatever point you were trying to make... and obviously, no one is expecting 100 TDs this season or anything like that from anyone in WL. I mean, this is WL. Have some common sense
The question will be: does the dual threat force the defense to do something different. If the QB did nothing but opened up the rFB for 200+ yards and a few TDs, that's still a win.
It should be interesting to see how it plays out.
True that, and also like this:
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=3063563&pbp_id=1202209
it seems like ppl are forgetting we are talking about a QB here, not a running back
I guess anyone watching that game who doesn't know the history between us and Alabama would find a lot of the play-calling from both sides to be confusing, but that is because these teams know each other so well, both teams really tried to take away things from the other offense while the offenses on the other hand was trying to take advantage of that. In fact, even though we were almost sure Bama was going to plan to take away the outside run and therefore we were best off attacking behind the OT and passing to the outside, we still did not drop the outside runs all the way to 0% because had they played differently and left some openings for that to be successful, the AI would have responded. When it comes down to it, you find where you have the best chance to run and go for it, and you find where you can get your receivers one-on-one in space. If you can do this better than the opponent and execute well, you can succeed. That's football.
Originally posted by reddogrw
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3057556
one game gave him 37 of his 101 total TD's
no CPU's in WL
37 TDs in one game still means she averaged over 4 TDs a game in all the rest. Not sure you did anything but lessen whatever point you were trying to make... and obviously, no one is expecting 100 TDs this season or anything like that from anyone in WL. I mean, this is WL. Have some common sense
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:53:38
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:52:05
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:51:01