User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Nothing is Impossible
Page:
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TJ Spikes
The question will be: does the dual threat force the defense to do something different. If the QB did nothing but opened up the rFB for 200+ yards and a few TDs, that's still a win.

It should be interesting to see how it plays out.



True that, and also like this:
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=3063563&pbp_id=1202209
it seems like ppl are forgetting we are talking about a QB here, not a running back

I guess anyone watching that game who doesn't know the history between us and Alabama would find a lot of the play-calling from both sides to be confusing, but that is because these teams know each other so well, both teams really tried to take away things from the other offense while the offenses on the other hand was trying to take advantage of that. In fact, even though we were almost sure Bama was going to plan to take away the outside run and therefore we were best off attacking behind the OT and passing to the outside, we still did not drop the outside runs all the way to 0% because had they played differently and left some openings for that to be successful, the AI would have responded. When it comes down to it, you find where you have the best chance to run and go for it, and you find where you can get your receivers one-on-one in space. If you can do this better than the opponent and execute well, you can succeed. That's football.


Originally posted by reddogrw
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3057556

one game gave him 37 of his 101 total TD's

no CPU's in WL

37 TDs in one game still means she averaged over 4 TDs a game in all the rest. Not sure you did anything but lessen whatever point you were trying to make... and obviously, no one is expecting 100 TDs this season or anything like that from anyone in WL. I mean, this is WL. Have some common sense

Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:53:38
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:52:05
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:51:01
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rocdog21
Spoiler:rocodog is a crybaby punk


lol, this is the guy who has said we are going to go 0-16 for the last 8 seasons, and what did we get? LITERALLY more trophies than any other team in our age tier, and that includes nothing but the elite League every single season. So what does this rocodog have to show for the same time period? Nothing. Nothing but him being wrong EVERY SEASON FOR 8 in a row, being far too petty and weak to EVER admit he was wrong- and meanwhile, where is his WL team? Where are his WL players? I think the thug dost protest too much about everyone else, instead of minding his own shit. Sad...
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Love how Darncat's go to stuff is to constantly call people names. At least he finally stopped calling everyone an Incel.
 
RyanCane26
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bash E. Bull
I guess anyone watching that game who doesn't know the history between us and Alabama would find a lot of the play-calling from both sides to be confusing,


https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=3063563&pbp_id=1202496 I did find them going for it on 4th and medium down 3 in FG range confusing
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Seric
Love how Darncat's go to stuff is to constantly call people names. At least he finally stopped calling everyone an Incel.


Are you prejudiced about identical twins, you weirdo? The reason both of us talk shit to you, rocodog, is because that is all you have ever done. Turnaround is fair play, hoser, and right now, you're CHOOSING to be the punching bag, rocodog. No one else have we said one bad thing about out of the context of normal competitive trash talking, except for you, roco/seric. Daniel does not even post anymore. Everybody else here, we have much respect for, and they know it, except for you. Ask yourself why.
Edited by Bash E. Bull on Aug 31, 2021 15:58:27
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RyanCane26
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=3063563&pbp_id=1202496 I did find them going for it on 4th and medium down 3 in FG range confusing


It really backfired, because we saw them killing us with that in previous games so we didn't use an all out run defense this time. That was the only time all game they targeted the WR1, because they thought we'd be in a totally different defense. I guess the call took guts, but it wasn't really a smart play in hidsight

The stupid shit is though, we almost blew it in the opposite situation when we ran on 4 and inches to put it away, but Bama kept all 11 on the LOS to stop it. I 100% knew that was coming and the very last thing I was changing on the AI was to pass on that exact 4th down situation, but my old ass fell asleep at the computer and woke up with the game already in progress. Had we lost because of that, I would still be kicking myself. This is the kinda stuff you have to learn from to be the best though! I know ppl hate to hear the word "process", but it really is
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bash E. Bull
Are you prejudiced about identical twins, you weirdo? The reason both of us talk shit to you, rocodog, is because that is all you have ever done. Turnaround is fair play, hoser, and right now, you're CHOOSING to be the punching bag, rocodog. No one else have we said one bad thing about out of the context of normal competitive trash talking, except for you, roco/seric. Daniel does not even post anymore. Everybody else here, we have much respect for, and they know it, except for you. Ask yourself why.


Oh no. Darncat doesn't have respect for me. Whatever am I to do? Dude you have at LEAST 2 known multis (and some suspected ones) You use them to post because your main account has been forum banned for quite some time now. Ask yourself why your main account got forum banned. Also hilarious how you're trying to make it out to be that me and rocdog are multis. It's clear as day who your multis are, darncat. Or should I call you bash e bull of Jeff Williams? I don't know, which one do you prefer?

Notice also how I said nothing about your player and only commented on your constant need to call people names? I mean good for you. You made a dual threat and your team got to WL. Now prove that your dual threat can be as productive against the best.
Edited by Seric on Aug 31, 2021 17:42:38
 
Daedalus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bash E. Bull
No one else have we said one bad thing about out of the context of normal competitive trash talking, except for you, roco/seric. Daniel does not even post anymore. Everybody else here, we have much respect for, and they know it, except for you. Ask yourself why.


Just gonna drop your "identical twin's" "respect" thread right here: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5297590

Man I miss that thread.

 
Daedalus
offline
Link
 
But my favorite, from page 7, was when your "identical twin" respectfully told me:

"so, you are the loser multi who wont let your players die
hopefully, you yourself will be dead soon, old man.
in any event, you are as good as dead to me, and blocked
you, the oldest most pathetic incel on Earth"

 
TheBear
Roll Tide
offline
Link
 
Not to take anything away from the kitties win...they won fair and square. But just for the record we did zero game planning for that game.
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Daedalus

Man I miss that thread.



Oh yeah, that was pretty hilarious, lol. I'm not sure why he lost his mind so much over that, but I will say one of the benefits of having stayed in the 'elite' Leagues every season this time is that we never had to play any of the garbage teams who seem purposely intent on being bad. It is painful to be honest, and honestly I'd rather lose a bunch than have games like that because at least you can learn something of value. I guess that is why he flipped out. He takes the shit too serious and the fact that other people do not just gets under his skin to a level I frankly can not explain. He's usually a calm guy, almost a pushover. I guess its the quiet ones you gotta look out for.


Originally posted by TheBear

Not to take anything away from the kitties win...they won fair and square. But just for the record we did zero game planning for that game.



So you are saying that your AI, after an entire season of just running the ball continuously and using those in/dig and post/slant routes when you did pass, your AI autoadjusted by itself in the 4th quarter of the game to do nothing but deep fades and posts out of trips and spread formation where we had put our 2 inside 'safeties' look on instead of 2 deep, and it adjusted to that all by itself? That's pretty impressive. There's still so much we have to learn.

Honestly, I thought our autoadjust would have gotten us back into a 2 deep look in those formations. It seemed like, the plays we were using worked so well for three quarters, the AI just refused to adjust to anything else when it fell apart in the 4th. I'm still trying to figure out exactly how to get the AI to be properly responsive. Sometimes it seems to work but other times not at all.

So if you didn't gameplan to go for the 4th down, was that the AIs decision? That play you ran seemed perfectly planned for what we used to run against you in that situation. Otherwise I'm stumped because usually you'd kick a FG in that situation if it was a 49 yarder. Possibly, it was this new inexplicable 'loss of kicker confidence' bug? I noticed it seems like in certain situations, the kicker's effective confidence or something goes waaaay down, perhaps like what happened to the Cursed Kicker. Could it be that the auto FG range 'senses' that because of a confidence hit or something of that sort to the kicker in a key situation, that his effective range is now too short so the AI went for it instead? It would kinda make sense if you think about coaches that don't have confidence in a kicker so they go for it instead...

Edited by Bash E. Bull on Sep 1, 2021 00:48:23
 
PaqMarq11
makes sense
offline
Link
 
chaos was a team full of level 73's. they were even supposed to be playing a league lower. congrats!

what is the over/under for the generals staying in wl? Or maybe winning more than 3 games? or for this qb having more than 15 TDs passing and/or 10 TDs rushing?
 
Rocdog21
Sancho
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bash E. Bull
lol, this is the guy who has said we are going to go 0-16 for the last 8 seasons, and what did we get? LITERALLY more trophies than any other team in our age tier, and that includes nothing but the elite League every single season. So what does this rocodog have to show for the same time period? Nothing. Nothing but him being wrong EVERY SEASON FOR 8 in a row, being far too petty and weak to EVER admit he was wrong- and meanwhile, where is his WL team? Where are his WL players? I think the thug dost protest too much about everyone else, instead of minding his own shit. Sad...


I haven't said anything to you in longer than 8 seasons, you delusional incel.

Not taking away what you guys did this season, but I'd say 0-16 is fair for WL.

Just retired my WL players, and moved one back to Casual Pro...Stop reaching.
 
TheBear
Roll Tide
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bash E. Bull
So you are saying that your AI, after an entire season of just running the ball continuously and using those in/dig and post/slant routes when you did pass, your AI autoadjusted by itself in the 4th quarter of the game to do nothing but deep fades and posts out of trips and spread formation where we had put our 2 inside 'safeties' look on instead of 2 deep, and it adjusted to that all by itself? That's pretty impressive. There's still so much we have to learn.

Honestly, I thought our autoadjust would have gotten us back into a 2 deep look in those formations. It seemed like, the plays we were using worked so well for three quarters, the AI just refused to adjust to anything else when it fell apart in the 4th. I'm still trying to figure out exactly how to get the AI to be properly responsive. Sometimes it seems to work but other times not at all.

So if you didn't gameplan to go for the 4th down, was that the AIs decision? That play you ran seemed perfectly planned for what we used to run against you in that situation. Otherwise I'm stumped because usually you'd kick a FG in that situation if it was a 49 yarder. Possibly, it was this new inexplicable 'loss of kicker confidence' bug? I noticed it seems like in certain situations, the kicker's effective confidence or something goes waaaay down, perhaps like what happened to the Cursed Kicker. Could it be that the auto FG range 'senses' that because of a confidence hit or something of that sort to the kicker in a key situation, that his effective range is now too short so the AI went for it instead? It would kinda make sense if you think about coaches that don't have confidence in a kicker so they go for it instead...



Woah Nellie, you unblocked me

I'm not the OC so I can't specifically answer your questions. I sent him a PM explaining how you guys always play us tough. His reply was - out of town and thought we would be ok, or something along those lines. I can only surmise we used the default OAI that kicks in on scrims. After the game he said he wished he had went all run on you guys.
So i dunno. Maybe he did do something.

Regardless of what did or didn't happen the best team won. I hope you do well in WL.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rocdog21
Spoiler: 0-16


their best chance slipped by today

may squeeze out a win; sometimes later in the season people don't pay attention if playoff spots are clinched
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.