Just noticed Corruption only has 42 dots. Period. Both Insanity and Palookas should be above them.
Forum > Pro Leagues > TTT thread (Tuesday Top Twenty-Five)
Originally posted by Novus
Just noticed Corruption only has 42 dots. Period. Both Insanity and Palookas should be above them.
with bad EL's too
Just noticed Corruption only has 42 dots. Period. Both Insanity and Palookas should be above them.
with bad EL's too
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by reddogrw
with bad EL's too
Yep, very much so.
We'll play 'em today, so I guess we'll know for sure in a few hours.
with bad EL's too
Yep, very much so.
We'll play 'em today, so I guess we'll know for sure in a few hours.
Originally posted by Novus
Err... I mean... LOL pre-season?
well, most of your team is level 68 - once you hit 72 and add equipment you can take them
Err... I mean... LOL pre-season?
well, most of your team is level 68 - once you hit 72 and add equipment you can take them
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Err... I mean... LOL pre-season?
bort doesn't like younger teams rushing vs older teams
Err... I mean... LOL pre-season?
bort doesn't like younger teams rushing vs older teams
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by reddogrw
well, most of your team is level 68 - once you hit 72 and add equipment you can take them
I sure hope so, or this is gonna be a loooooong season.
well, most of your team is level 68 - once you hit 72 and add equipment you can take them
I sure hope so, or this is gonna be a loooooong season.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
bort doesn't like younger teams rushing vs older teams
Guess not.
bort doesn't like younger teams rushing vs older teams
Guess not.
Kenshinzen
offline
offline
Bort likes very much all rushing teams that's why they exist. Almost all rushing teams (throwing a screen here and there) are everywhere! 
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Bort likes very much all rushing teams that's why they exist. Almost all rushing teams (throwing a screen here and there) are everywhere!
Define "almost all rushing." With, like, numbers.
Bort likes very much all rushing teams that's why they exist. Almost all rushing teams (throwing a screen here and there) are everywhere!
Define "almost all rushing." With, like, numbers.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Define "almost all rushing." With, like, numbers.
Coz when I look at World League, I see, like, maaaaaaaaaaaybe 2 almost all-running teams if I tilt my head and squint. I also see 3 almost all-passing teams, and 7 teams that run like 50% to 65% of the time.
But sure, everyone is all-running all the time now, and all-running teams are totally unstoppable, and it's all because Johnny Quarterback knocked Bort's glasses off his head in high school so now he hates passing. And that's why I'm undefeated in World League.
Define "almost all rushing." With, like, numbers.
Coz when I look at World League, I see, like, maaaaaaaaaaaybe 2 almost all-running teams if I tilt my head and squint. I also see 3 almost all-passing teams, and 7 teams that run like 50% to 65% of the time.
But sure, everyone is all-running all the time now, and all-running teams are totally unstoppable, and it's all because Johnny Quarterback knocked Bort's glasses off his head in high school so now he hates passing. And that's why I'm undefeated in World League.
Kenshinzen
offline
offline
Maybe you must look in 8-10 last WL finals and tell me what you see. Just saying... 
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Maybe you must look in 8-10 last WL finals and tell me what you see. Just saying...
First of all, you said almost-all-running teams are "everywhere." My numbers show they're not. There are more almost-all-PASSING teams in WL (3) than almost-all-running teams (2). The remaining 7 teams are more balanced. So, that claim of yours is just wrong. Period.
Second, you continue to assert that almost-all-running teams are overpowered and pretty much impossible to beat. Let's take your suggestion and look at some WL finals:
S86 - Brothers 35, Nomad 20
Brothers rolls with a run-heavy attack, Nomad goes 50/50 run/pass. But if run-heavy teams are impossible to stop, then how did a 50/50 offense even reach the WL final at all?
S85 - SWAT 13, Brothers 6
If run-heavy offenses are so impossible to stop, then why did both teams go run-heavy and combine for less than 20 points and 500 yards? Both defenses had very little trouble stopping the run. It's also important to note that SWAT passed a LOT more during the regular season and in the other playoff games, and only went run-heavy when faced with a run-heavy finals opponent. They studied their opponent, adjusted their gameplan, and won. There's a name for that. It's called... wait for iiiiiiit... "football."
S84 - SWAT 21, Brothers 3
Another run heavy game, but what's this? Brothers attempted 2 passes. SWAT attempted 13... and WON?!?!? How could this be! We ALL know running is over-powered and unstoppable, so how did the team that threw more win the game? Oh, and once again, make sure to ignore that SWAT got to the Finals by passing much more in their other games, only going run-heavy when it made sense to for a specific opponent. But, hey, adjusting your gameplan for a specific opponent is just so ALIEN to football, am I right?
Should I continue? I could point out the almost-all-running team losing 3 title games in a row and looking bad on offense in all 3 games, or the S82 finals where both teams threw like crazy.
Just because *you* can't figure out how to beat a run-heavy team doesn't mean they're unbeatable. It means *you* can't figure out how to beat them.
Maybe you must look in 8-10 last WL finals and tell me what you see. Just saying...
First of all, you said almost-all-running teams are "everywhere." My numbers show they're not. There are more almost-all-PASSING teams in WL (3) than almost-all-running teams (2). The remaining 7 teams are more balanced. So, that claim of yours is just wrong. Period.
Second, you continue to assert that almost-all-running teams are overpowered and pretty much impossible to beat. Let's take your suggestion and look at some WL finals:
S86 - Brothers 35, Nomad 20
Brothers rolls with a run-heavy attack, Nomad goes 50/50 run/pass. But if run-heavy teams are impossible to stop, then how did a 50/50 offense even reach the WL final at all?
S85 - SWAT 13, Brothers 6
If run-heavy offenses are so impossible to stop, then why did both teams go run-heavy and combine for less than 20 points and 500 yards? Both defenses had very little trouble stopping the run. It's also important to note that SWAT passed a LOT more during the regular season and in the other playoff games, and only went run-heavy when faced with a run-heavy finals opponent. They studied their opponent, adjusted their gameplan, and won. There's a name for that. It's called... wait for iiiiiiit... "football."
S84 - SWAT 21, Brothers 3
Another run heavy game, but what's this? Brothers attempted 2 passes. SWAT attempted 13... and WON?!?!? How could this be! We ALL know running is over-powered and unstoppable, so how did the team that threw more win the game? Oh, and once again, make sure to ignore that SWAT got to the Finals by passing much more in their other games, only going run-heavy when it made sense to for a specific opponent. But, hey, adjusting your gameplan for a specific opponent is just so ALIEN to football, am I right?
Should I continue? I could point out the almost-all-running team losing 3 title games in a row and looking bad on offense in all 3 games, or the S82 finals where both teams threw like crazy.
Just because *you* can't figure out how to beat a run-heavy team doesn't mean they're unbeatable. It means *you* can't figure out how to beat them.
Originally posted by Novus
First of all, you said almost-all-running teams are "everywhere." My numbers show they're not. There are more almost-all-PASSING teams in WL (3) than almost-all-running teams (2). The remaining 7 teams are more balanced. So, that claim of yours is just wrong. Period.
Second, you continue to assert that almost-all-running teams are overpowered and pretty much impossible to beat. Let's take your suggestion and look at some WL finals:
S86 - Brothers 35, Nomad 20
Brothers rolls with a run-heavy attack, Nomad goes 50/50 run/pass. But if run-heavy teams are impossible to stop, then how did a 50/50 offense even reach the WL final at all?
S85 - SWAT 13, Brothers 6
If run-heavy offenses are so impossible to stop, then why did both teams go run-heavy and combine for less than 20 points and 500 yards? Both defenses had very little trouble stopping the run. It's also important to note that SWAT passed a LOT more during the regular season and in the other playoff games, and only went run-heavy when faced with a run-heavy finals opponent. They studied their opponent, adjusted their gameplan, and won. There's a name for that. It's called... wait for iiiiiiit... "football."
S84 - SWAT 21, Brothers 3
Another run heavy game, but what's this? Brothers attempted 2 passes. SWAT attempted 13... and WON?!?!? How could this be! We ALL know running is over-powered and unstoppable, so how did the team that threw more win the game? Oh, and once again, make sure to ignore that SWAT got to the Finals by passing much more in their other games, only going run-heavy when it made sense to for a specific opponent. But, hey, adjusting your gameplan for a specific opponent is just so ALIEN to football, am I right?
Should I continue? I could point out the almost-all-running team losing 3 title games in a row and looking bad on offense in all 3 games, or the S82 finals where both teams threw like crazy.
Just because *you* can't figure out how to beat a run-heavy team doesn't mean they're unbeatable. It means *you* can't figure out how to beat them.
SWAT and BIA are run by the same people
First of all, you said almost-all-running teams are "everywhere." My numbers show they're not. There are more almost-all-PASSING teams in WL (3) than almost-all-running teams (2). The remaining 7 teams are more balanced. So, that claim of yours is just wrong. Period.
Second, you continue to assert that almost-all-running teams are overpowered and pretty much impossible to beat. Let's take your suggestion and look at some WL finals:
S86 - Brothers 35, Nomad 20
Brothers rolls with a run-heavy attack, Nomad goes 50/50 run/pass. But if run-heavy teams are impossible to stop, then how did a 50/50 offense even reach the WL final at all?
S85 - SWAT 13, Brothers 6
If run-heavy offenses are so impossible to stop, then why did both teams go run-heavy and combine for less than 20 points and 500 yards? Both defenses had very little trouble stopping the run. It's also important to note that SWAT passed a LOT more during the regular season and in the other playoff games, and only went run-heavy when faced with a run-heavy finals opponent. They studied their opponent, adjusted their gameplan, and won. There's a name for that. It's called... wait for iiiiiiit... "football."
S84 - SWAT 21, Brothers 3
Another run heavy game, but what's this? Brothers attempted 2 passes. SWAT attempted 13... and WON?!?!? How could this be! We ALL know running is over-powered and unstoppable, so how did the team that threw more win the game? Oh, and once again, make sure to ignore that SWAT got to the Finals by passing much more in their other games, only going run-heavy when it made sense to for a specific opponent. But, hey, adjusting your gameplan for a specific opponent is just so ALIEN to football, am I right?
Should I continue? I could point out the almost-all-running team losing 3 title games in a row and looking bad on offense in all 3 games, or the S82 finals where both teams threw like crazy.
Just because *you* can't figure out how to beat a run-heavy team doesn't mean they're unbeatable. It means *you* can't figure out how to beat them.
SWAT and BIA are run by the same people
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
