Thought this was fixed years ago. Guy ghosts right through his teammate.
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/784273/164020
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/784273/164020
Edited by Cybertron on Apr 1, 2021 18:41:06
Raid
offline
offline
Yeah player collision only seems to work when it wants to, and being able to go through teammates seems like a common one.
vipermaw82
offline
offline
You guys still get confused that what we see is just a "visual representation" of what probably happened in the text code. Whether they got "caught" on each other or not is just what we see doesnt mean its what happened.
Cybertron
offline
offline
Originally posted by vipermaw82
You guys still get confused that what we see is just a "visual representation" of what probably happened in the text code. Whether they got "caught" on each other or not is just what we see doesnt mean its what happened.
So when I saw Tommie Frazier running over those Gator defenders, it really didn't happen?
You guys still get confused that what we see is just a "visual representation" of what probably happened in the text code. Whether they got "caught" on each other or not is just what we see doesnt mean its what happened.
So when I saw Tommie Frazier running over those Gator defenders, it really didn't happen?
vipermaw82
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cybertron
So when I saw Tommie Frazier running over those Gator defenders, it really didn't happen?
he didnt ghost through them. He broke through them.
So when I saw Tommie Frazier running over those Gator defenders, it really didn't happen?
he didnt ghost through them. He broke through them.
Raid
offline
offline
Originally posted by vipermaw82
You guys still get confused that what we see is just a "visual representation" of what probably happened in the text code. Whether they got "caught" on each other or not is just what we see doesnt mean its what happened.
Thing is, visual representation means something when it comes to player positioning and moving through and around them.
That line was used back in GLB1 because out of bounds lines sometimes didn't match in replay to where they were in the sim and they were too lazy to correct it. The sim didn't magically not have this guy go through another, the representation we get is a mockup of all the actions that get simmed including player position.
Sometimes players faze through eachother and sometimes they don't, sometimes your player avoids a guy on the ground like he's the plague and sometimes he runs right at a guy who is about to stand up, it's not that the replay is just off in every single situation to magically make this happen.
You could make the 'sim isn't an exact representation' argument for the QB throwing the ball 12 yards upfield every time on a screen, but we know for a fact that's not just a visual bug.
You guys still get confused that what we see is just a "visual representation" of what probably happened in the text code. Whether they got "caught" on each other or not is just what we see doesnt mean its what happened.
Thing is, visual representation means something when it comes to player positioning and moving through and around them.
That line was used back in GLB1 because out of bounds lines sometimes didn't match in replay to where they were in the sim and they were too lazy to correct it. The sim didn't magically not have this guy go through another, the representation we get is a mockup of all the actions that get simmed including player position.
Sometimes players faze through eachother and sometimes they don't, sometimes your player avoids a guy on the ground like he's the plague and sometimes he runs right at a guy who is about to stand up, it's not that the replay is just off in every single situation to magically make this happen.
You could make the 'sim isn't an exact representation' argument for the QB throwing the ball 12 yards upfield every time on a screen, but we know for a fact that's not just a visual bug.
vipermaw82
offline
offline
Originally posted by Raid
Thing is, visual representation means something when it comes to player positioning and moving through and around them.
That line was used back in GLB1 because out of bounds lines sometimes didn't match in replay to where they were in the sim and they were too lazy to correct it. The sim didn't magically not have this guy go through another, the representation we get is a mockup of all the actions that get simmed including player position.
Sometimes players faze through eachother and sometimes they don't, sometimes your player avoids a guy on the ground like he's the plague and sometimes he runs right at a guy who is about to stand up, it's not that the replay is just off in every single situation to magically make this happen.
You could make the 'sim isn't an exact representation' argument for the QB throwing the ball 12 yards upfield every time on a screen, but we know for a fact that's not just a visual bug.
It could be just the center dot of the player being represented didnt reach the collision area. Therefor it didnt acknowledge a physical representation of a player being there. or he could just phase through them, idk didnt write the code.
Thing is, visual representation means something when it comes to player positioning and moving through and around them.
That line was used back in GLB1 because out of bounds lines sometimes didn't match in replay to where they were in the sim and they were too lazy to correct it. The sim didn't magically not have this guy go through another, the representation we get is a mockup of all the actions that get simmed including player position.
Sometimes players faze through eachother and sometimes they don't, sometimes your player avoids a guy on the ground like he's the plague and sometimes he runs right at a guy who is about to stand up, it's not that the replay is just off in every single situation to magically make this happen.
You could make the 'sim isn't an exact representation' argument for the QB throwing the ball 12 yards upfield every time on a screen, but we know for a fact that's not just a visual bug.
It could be just the center dot of the player being represented didnt reach the collision area. Therefor it didnt acknowledge a physical representation of a player being there. or he could just phase through them, idk didnt write the code.
Yeah, was talking to a girl a couple months ago and haven't heard from her at all.
Ace of Spades 7
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Yeah, was talking to a girl a couple months ago and haven't heard from her at all.
Maybe because she wanted you to alphabetize the playbook plays and you were a jerk about it.
Could have been something else though.
Yeah, was talking to a girl a couple months ago and haven't heard from her at all.
Maybe because she wanted you to alphabetize the playbook plays and you were a jerk about it.
Could have been something else though.
eTHICCalBEEF
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ace of Spades 7
Maybe because she wanted you to alphabetize the playbook plays and you were a jerk about it.
Could have been something else though.
Might have had something to do with using the catchphrase "six inches of pure deliciousness... on a stick"
Maybe because she wanted you to alphabetize the playbook plays and you were a jerk about it.
Could have been something else though.
Might have had something to do with using the catchphrase "six inches of pure deliciousness... on a stick"
Originally posted by Kvothe27
Might have had something to do with using the catchphrase "six inches of pure deliciousness... on a stick"
That's a perfectly acceptable length.
Might have had something to do with using the catchphrase "six inches of pure deliciousness... on a stick"
That's a perfectly acceptable length.
rabidlizard24
offline
offline
Originally posted by 4chanCitizen
Spiritually?
Spiritual Dick sounds like a good team name
Spiritually?
Spiritual Dick sounds like a good team name
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
