Warrior General Games

Shouldnt juke actually lower the carry grip of a player?

I'd think so. Whenever your shifting and turning your torso, like you would when you Juke, the ball is not as stable as when you're running straight ahead.

Originally posted by Ace of Spades 7
I'd think so. Whenever your shifting and turning your torso, like you would when you Juke, the ball is not as stable as when you're running straight ahead.

Agreed, a lot of the time when you juke you arent even looking at the guy thats going going to tackle you as you're already thinking your passed him. but yeah the movement of your body automatically will lose some control over the ball because your twisting and moving your body against momentum and such.

Honestly power backs should fumble less than elusive, not more. In real life power backs are normal less likely to fumble.

Originally posted by rabidlizard24
Honestly power backs should fumble less than elusive, not more. In real life power backs are normal less likely to fumble.

However power backs also dont run through 6 tackles a carry in real life and run 4.3

I have no dog in this fight, but it makes sense to give Juke a Carry Grip penalty, since ballcarriers will be moving the ball to the arm away from tacklers, increasing the risk of a fumble. Or they don't, with the same result.