Warrior General Games

...it didn't go so well.


http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5301424&page=1

Real question is how do we get this guy over here
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5301348&page=1

Hahaha, oh man. That guy seems to epitomize the entire community.

Originally posted by Lemoncow
Hahaha, oh man. That guy seems to epitomize the entire community.

somehow the the original has more active forums than this one lol

Originally posted by o The Boss x
Real question is how do we get this guy over here
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5301348&page=1

Get GE on the horn

Oh suck duck.

On second thought: let's not go to GLB1, 'tis a silly place.

Stupid little balls moving around a green rectangle

Accurate

Originally posted by Bretto007
Stupid little balls moving around a green rectangle

Accurate

I would not be here if GLB2 resembled anything like that!

I watched the plays of the week from GLB and could not help but lol, very accurate description BRETT

I just want the GLB play editor brought over

Originally posted by BoDiddley
I just want the GLB play editor brought over

Same. People cry that it will be exploited even though they fixed it literally years ago.

Originally posted by Raid
On second thought: let's not go to GLB1, 'tis a silly place.

Literally made me laugh out loud.

Maybe I came off as an asshole, but what grinds my gears is their responses to actual questions.

"What makes GLB1 better?"

"Harhar-tic-tac-toe-harharhar."

Reeks of a toxic community.

The weirdest part for me is the "there's no strategy" argument, while none of the people making the claims have finished at the top of the ladder here. Has one player, goes 50/50 in wins after a couple seasons, declares there's no real strategy and the game is simplistic.

Could also call chess simplistic with no strategy after playing two games where you don't pay attention and randomly move your pieces against someone else randomly moving pieces. Middling performance against players of middling skill usually isn't the greatest test of strategy and is a weird place to hang your hat.

Originally posted by Corndog
The weirdest part for me is the "there's no strategy" argument, while none of the people making the claims have finished at the top of the ladder here. Has one player, goes 50/50 in wins after a couple seasons, declares there's no real strategy and the game is simplistic.

Could also call chess simplistic with no strategy after playing two games where you don't pay attention and randomly move your pieces against someone else randomly moving pieces. Middling performance against players of middling skill usually isn't the greatest test of strategy and is a weird place to hang your hat.

Im with it but you should prolly post this on the GLB1 forums, not here. No offense meant here but does the GLB1 userbase know that you and bort still exist?

The "lack of control here makes it more strategic in a sense. Either way, it's a debate that neither side will win, each userbase's heels are dug in too deep for there to ever be a crossover - the people who have crossed over already have and the people that didn't will never.