Hey folks, I'm brand new to GLB2 (played the original many years ago though). I'm surprised the league forums are so quiet. Is this league mostly CPU teams?
BAS
BAS
stamango
offline
offline
I just got a team in this league last night. It's quiet but I see some names I recognize. It won't be quiet for long most likely.
mykleSTRAIGHTUP
offline
offline
Probably just lots of new/returning players here getting used to running a team. Lots of the reset/experienced teams are in other leagues in our tier.
Lets get a few more league games under our belt before the smack talking
Lets get a few more league games under our belt before the smack talking
baldandsexy
offline
offline
Glad to see some others here.
I don't plan on any smack talk. I'm fairly certain my team is a decent bit away from being able to smack talk.
I figure this season will be learning the system and building a team, and next season we may do ok.
I don't plan on any smack talk. I'm fairly certain my team is a decent bit away from being able to smack talk.
I figure this season will be learning the system and building a team, and next season we may do ok.
zeroalan
offline
offline
I just created a couple CB's and stuck them on what I thought at the time were CPU teams to get some playing time....well ooops lol!
2 games in one of them has 3 total plays and the other 0 plays...pretty sweet
2 games in one of them has 3 total plays and the other 0 plays...pretty sweet
baldandsexy
offline
offline
zeroalan, I have the same problem. To start I created a CB and had him run some games and now I can't sign him. He's stuck on a CPU team, and I don't expect much playing time either.
Next season we'll have a better grip on it.
Next season we'll have a better grip on it.
Bamango
offline
offline
Originally posted by baldandsexy
zeroalan, I have the same problem. To start I created a CB and had him run some games and now I can't sign him. He's stuck on a CPU team, and I don't expect much playing time either.
Next season we'll have a better grip on it.
I can't even count how many things I learned the hard way. And I still have more to learn. Anyway, ask if you guys have questions. I know there is a lot of experience here. Also the help forums contain a lot of very useful info I have found, and you can post questions there. There are no stupid questions here lol.
zeroalan, I have the same problem. To start I created a CB and had him run some games and now I can't sign him. He's stuck on a CPU team, and I don't expect much playing time either.
Next season we'll have a better grip on it.
I can't even count how many things I learned the hard way. And I still have more to learn. Anyway, ask if you guys have questions. I know there is a lot of experience here. Also the help forums contain a lot of very useful info I have found, and you can post questions there. There are no stupid questions here lol.
Edited by Bamango on Jul 14, 2017 22:35:30
stamango
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bretto007
Stupid question- Is there a search function for the forums?
Not that I am aware of. I looked for that too.
Stupid question- Is there a search function for the forums?
Not that I am aware of. I looked for that too.
rolandmann
offline
offline
Hey all.
Long time GLB ONE player here...been away FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS! Didn't even know there was a GLB2 until last week. Like always, I just dove in and bought a team! LOL
No smack talk from me--still trying to feel my way around...
Good to see everyone here!
Long time GLB ONE player here...been away FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS! Didn't even know there was a GLB2 until last week. Like always, I just dove in and bought a team! LOL
No smack talk from me--still trying to feel my way around...
Good to see everyone here!
Zagam
offline
offline
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 6
Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Oakland Hustlers - Adams - (4-0-0) - 90.22
2. Northern Norsemen - Adams - (3-1-0) - 89.53
3. Norfolk InChance - Adams - (2-2-0) - 86.00
4. Sacramento Pit Bulls - Adams - (2-2-0) - 85.94
5. Kansas City Chiefers - Adams - (2-2-0) - 84.94
6. Tulsa Buckaroos - Adams - (1-3-0) - 83.78
7. Denver Preachers - Adams - (2-2-0) - 83.53
8. St. Louis Samurai - Adams - (2-2-0) - 83.44
9. Reno Thunder - Adams - (2-2-0) - 82.69
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons - Adams - (1-3-0) - 82.13
11. Chimneyville Defenders - Adams - (1-3-0) - 80.78
BEST OF STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1699.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1446.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1416.0
5. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1285.0
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 748.5
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 495.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 461.0
5. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 451.5
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1250.5
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1056.0
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 904.5
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 783.5
Total Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 984.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1161.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1164.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1247.5
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1359.5
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 260.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 327.0
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 401.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 404.5
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 616.0
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 638.5
3. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 724.5
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 761.5
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 787.5
Total Yards Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 714.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 254.5
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 198.5
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -39.5
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : -88
Turnover Differntial
1. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 9
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 8
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 7
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 4
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 2
Total Points Scored
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 108
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 105
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 77
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 58
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 50
Total Points Allowed
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 20
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 26
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 33
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 48
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 53
Total Points Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 85
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 51
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 25
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 25
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -7
WORST OF STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1004.5
2. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1088.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1124.5
4. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1152.0
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1205.5
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 358.0
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 368.5
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 380.5
4. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 382.5
5. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 390.0
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 0.0
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.0
3. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 646.5
4. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 706.0
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 744.5
Total Defensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1918.0
2. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1514.5
3. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1468.0
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1459.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1445.0
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1156.5
2. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 852.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 576.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 546.0
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 543.0
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1058.0
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1040.5
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 938.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 864.0
Total Yards Differential
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -913.5
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -293
3. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -271
4. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -248.5
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -204.5
Turnover Differntial
1. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -2
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : -1
3. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 0
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 0
5. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1
Total Points Scored
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 24
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 24
3. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 36
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 37
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 46
Total Points Allowed
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 112
2. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 83
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 82
4. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 81
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 60
Total Points Differential
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -75
2. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -57
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -33
4. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -30
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -12
These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!
** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14
Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
RAW STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1699.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1446.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1416.0
5. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1285.0
6. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1219.5
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1205.5
8. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1152.0
9. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1124.5
10. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1088.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1004.5
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 748.5
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 495.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 461.0
5. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 451.5
6. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 448.5
7. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 390.0
8. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 382.5
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 380.5
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 368.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 358.0
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1250.5
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1056.0
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 904.5
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 783.5
6. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 768.0
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 744.5
8. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 706.0
9. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 646.5
10. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.0
11. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 0.0
Total Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 984.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1161.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1164.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1247.5
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1359.5
6. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1410.0
7. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1445.0
8. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1459.0
9. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1468.0
10. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1514.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1918.0
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 260.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 327.0
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 401.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 404.5
6. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 523.0
7. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 543.0
8. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 546.0
9. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 576.5
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 852.0
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1156.5
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 616.0
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 638.5
3. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 724.5
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 761.5
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 787.5
6. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 816.5
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 864.0
8. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
9. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 938.0
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1040.5
11. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1058.0
Total Yards Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 714.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 254.5
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 198.5
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -39.5
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : -88
6. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -174
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -204.5
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -248.5
9. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -271
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -293
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -913.5
Turnover Differntial
1. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 9
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 8
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 7
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 4
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 2
6. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1
7. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 0
9. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 0
10. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : -1
11. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -2
Total Points Scored
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 108
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 105
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 77
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 58
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 50
6. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 49
7. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 46
8. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 37
9. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 36
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 24
11. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 24
Total Points Allowed
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 20
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 26
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 33
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 48
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 53
6. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 54
7. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 60
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 81
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 82
10. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 83
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 112
Total Points Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 85
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 51
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 25
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 25
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -7
6. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -10
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -12
8. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -30
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -33
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -57
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -75
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 6
Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Oakland Hustlers - Adams - (4-0-0) - 90.22
2. Northern Norsemen - Adams - (3-1-0) - 89.53
3. Norfolk InChance - Adams - (2-2-0) - 86.00
4. Sacramento Pit Bulls - Adams - (2-2-0) - 85.94
5. Kansas City Chiefers - Adams - (2-2-0) - 84.94
6. Tulsa Buckaroos - Adams - (1-3-0) - 83.78
7. Denver Preachers - Adams - (2-2-0) - 83.53
8. St. Louis Samurai - Adams - (2-2-0) - 83.44
9. Reno Thunder - Adams - (2-2-0) - 82.69
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons - Adams - (1-3-0) - 82.13
11. Chimneyville Defenders - Adams - (1-3-0) - 80.78
BEST OF STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1699.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1446.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1416.0
5. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1285.0
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 748.5
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 495.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 461.0
5. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 451.5
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1250.5
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1056.0
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 904.5
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 783.5
Total Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 984.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1161.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1164.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1247.5
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1359.5
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 260.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 327.0
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 401.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 404.5
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 616.0
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 638.5
3. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 724.5
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 761.5
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 787.5
Total Yards Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 714.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 254.5
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 198.5
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -39.5
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : -88
Turnover Differntial
1. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 9
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 8
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 7
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 4
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 2
Total Points Scored
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 108
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 105
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 77
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 58
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 50
Total Points Allowed
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 20
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 26
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 33
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 48
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 53
Total Points Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 85
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 51
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 25
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 25
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -7
WORST OF STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1004.5
2. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1088.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1124.5
4. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1152.0
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1205.5
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 358.0
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 368.5
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 380.5
4. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 382.5
5. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 390.0
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 0.0
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.0
3. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 646.5
4. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 706.0
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 744.5
Total Defensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1918.0
2. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1514.5
3. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1468.0
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1459.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1445.0
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1156.5
2. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 852.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 576.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 546.0
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 543.0
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1058.0
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1040.5
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 938.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 864.0
Total Yards Differential
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -913.5
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -293
3. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -271
4. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -248.5
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -204.5
Turnover Differntial
1. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -2
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : -1
3. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 0
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 0
5. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1
Total Points Scored
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 24
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 24
3. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 36
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 37
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 46
Total Points Allowed
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 112
2. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 83
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 82
4. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 81
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 60
Total Points Differential
1. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -75
2. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -57
3. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -33
4. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -30
5. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -12
These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!
** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14
Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
RAW STATS
Total Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1699.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1446.0
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1416.0
5. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1285.0
6. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1219.5
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1205.5
8. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1152.0
9. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1124.5
10. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1088.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1004.5
Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1426.5
2. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 748.5
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 495.5
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 461.0
5. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 451.5
6. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 448.5
7. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 390.0
8. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 382.5
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 380.5
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 368.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 358.0
Passing Offensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 1250.5
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1056.0
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 904.5
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 783.5
6. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 768.0
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 744.5
8. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 706.0
9. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 646.5
10. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.0
11. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 0.0
Total Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 984.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1161.5
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 1164.0
4. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 1247.5
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 1359.5
6. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 1410.0
7. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1445.0
8. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1459.0
9. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 1468.0
10. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 1514.5
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1918.0
Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 260.0
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 327.0
3. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 376.5
4. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 401.0
5. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 404.5
6. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 523.0
7. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 543.0
8. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 546.0
9. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 576.5
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 852.0
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1156.5
Passing Defensive Yards
1. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 616.0
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 638.5
3. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 724.5
4. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 761.5
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 787.5
6. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 816.5
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 864.0
8. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 920.5
9. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 938.0
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 1040.5
11. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 1058.0
Total Yards Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 714.5
2. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 254.5
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 198.5
4. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -39.5
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : -88
6. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -174
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -204.5
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -248.5
9. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -271
10. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -293
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -913.5
Turnover Differntial
1. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 9
2. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 8
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 7
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 4
5. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 2
6. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 1
7. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 1
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 0
9. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 0
10. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : -1
11. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -2
Total Points Scored
1. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 108
2. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 105
3. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 77
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 58
5. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 50
6. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 49
7. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 46
8. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 37
9. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 36
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 24
11. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 24
Total Points Allowed
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 20
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 26
3. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 33
4. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : 48
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : 53
6. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : 54
7. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : 60
8. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : 81
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : 82
10. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 83
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : 112
Total Points Differential
1. Northern Norsemen (Rookie : Adams) : 85
2. Oakland Hustlers (Rookie : Adams) : 51
3. Sacramento Pit Bulls (Rookie : Adams) : 25
4. Tulsa Buckaroos (Rookie : Adams) : 25
5. Norfolk InChance (Rookie : Adams) : -7
6. Denver Preachers (Rookie : Adams) : -10
7. St. Louis Samurai (Rookie : Adams) : -12
8. Reno Thunder (Rookie : Adams) : -30
9. Kansas City Chiefers (Rookie : Adams) : -33
10. Wake Forest Demon Deacons (Rookie : Adams) : -57
11. Chimneyville Defenders (Rookie : Adams) : -75
rolandmann
offline
offline
As depressing as that is to see, THANKS for doing it. Love these things.
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
Bamango
offline
offline
Originally posted by rolandmann
As depressing as that is to see, THANKS for doing it. Love these things.
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
It really is to me. Took me awhile to learn it all but it helps me set up game plans or at least scout the opposing team w/o having to watch the games as much. The Virtual player tool also helps me out immensely.
As depressing as that is to see, THANKS for doing it. Love these things.
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
It really is to me. Took me awhile to learn it all but it helps me set up game plans or at least scout the opposing team w/o having to watch the games as much. The Virtual player tool also helps me out immensely.
mykleSTRAIGHTUP
offline
offline
Originally posted by rolandmann
As depressing as that is to see, THANKS for doing it. Love these things.
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
If you want to get serious about the game, then yes. At least for a season or two. Get an idea of what the top offense and defensive plays are and what top teams run.
As bamango said, the virtual player tool is extremely helping in showing you what your players stats will be before creating them
As depressing as that is to see, THANKS for doing it. Love these things.
Is the GLB2Scout tool worth the bucks?
If you want to get serious about the game, then yes. At least for a season or two. Get an idea of what the top offense and defensive plays are and what top teams run.
As bamango said, the virtual player tool is extremely helping in showing you what your players stats will be before creating them
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
