Warrior General Games

Not sure if ever discussed... but why not allow for trades? Obviously with a deadline, with salary cap parameters and approval from admin. I see plenty of teams, if not most teams that could benefit.

Also, I know everyone loves beating CPU teams and weak teams 160-0 but how realistic is that? Not a fan of seeing guys run for 800 yards and 15 touchdowns in a game. Ever consider scaling this back?

Far far far too much emphasis is placed on coaching and game-plans versus skill of the players. Just my opinion.

Originally posted by TSgamer
Far far far too much emphasis is placed on coaching and game-plans versus skill of the players. Just my opinion.

I like the trade idea.. but I think skills of players or builds play a huge part already, but game planning and tactics are equally important.. I think it's a nice mesh of all three .. but I haven't played this game enough to really have a valid opinion.

Trades are meaningless unless they allow for cheaper chemistry penalties. In which case that will be the only way to move players pretty much and exploited by the networks.

Cpu players should be better. It's just unfortunate so many people get butt hurt over losing to cpu teams.

Originally posted by bhall43
Cpu players should be better. It's just unfortunate so many people get butt hurt over losing to cpu teams.
lol yea CPU players are shit, I wish they were semi legit

Originally posted by bhall43
Trades are meaningless unless they allow for cheaper chemistry penalties. In which case that will be the only way to move players pretty much and exploited by the networks.

I traded one in GLB, It sucked and there is no reason to do it

Originally posted by MadCow420

lol yea CPU players are shit, I wish they were semi legit


I mean they have Chem just like regular players. Give them a little more legit builds and maybe have some focused guys a team can pick up.

How about superstar cpu players too? I mean why not? It's not like it will guarantee you should a great player but it will level the playing field among guys who have a hard time recruiting them a bit.

Originally posted by bhall43
How about superstar cpu players too? I mean why not? It's not like it will guarantee you should a great player but it will level the playing field among guys who have a hard time recruiting them a bit.

love it. hate how bad cpu players and teams are. almost borders on stupidity.

Originally posted by bhall43
How about superstar cpu players too? I mean why not? It's not like it will guarantee you should a great player but it will level the playing field among guys who have a hard time recruiting them a bit.

that's a really good idea

Seems like a no Brainer idea. The tiers are getting smaller and smaller. Why not let these guys paying for teams put together some quality rosters even if it is cpu?

Why do I feel this is a copypasta from an old glb classic suggestion

Originally posted by TSgamer


Far far far too much emphasis is placed on coaching and game-plans versus skill of the players. Just my opinion.

Well, to be fair, the importance of game-plans vs. player builds changes as you go up the tiers. In rookie a good game-plan trumps any type of player build but as you go up the power of the game-plan diminishes until you reach Vet, where there is very little you can do to stop certain builds using just game-planning (good builds are needed to counter good builds).

I think the balance is just about right, if game-planning was any less important I'd probably call it quits as the coaching is the only thing really keeping me interested.

Originally posted by MadCow420
that's a really good idea

Just make sure you can't cheat by keep dropping and adding until you load up your roster with S*s.

Originally posted by Danthesportsman


I think the balance is just about right, if game-planning was any less important I'd probably call it quits as the coaching is the only thing really keeping me interested.



this