User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Disbanded League Forums > Rum League > Power, power, power...
Page:
 
agerm73
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 3

Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Science Fair - Rum - (2-0-0) - 81.72
2. Vermont Coyotes - Rum - (2-0-0) - 80.88
3. Cleveland Dawgs - Rum - (1-0-1) - 79.22
4. Windsor Warriors - Rum - (1-1-0) - 76.88
5. Nintendo Power - Rum - (1-1-0) - 76.53
6. Junkyard Rottweilers - Rum - (1-1-0) - 75.56
7. San Francisco 49ers - Rum - (1-1-0) - 75.19
8. Da Beers - Rum - (1-1-0) - 75.03
9. Detroit Lions - Rum - (0-1-1) - 74.09
10. Denver Wolves - Rum - (0-2-0) - 72.09
11. Milwaukee Express - Rum - (0-2-0) - 71.03
12. Pittsburgh Hares - Rum - (0-2-0) - 71.00


BEST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 840.5
2. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 726.0
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 705.0
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 583.0
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 558.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 209.0
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 207.0
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 205.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 201.0
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 186.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 774.0
2. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 525.0
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 500.0
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 451.0
5. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 381.0

Total Defensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 294.0
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 305.0
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 449.5
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 450.0
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 500.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 59.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 85.0
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 104.5
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 128.5
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 131.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 130.0
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 177.5
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 220.0
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 321.5
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 343.5

Total Yards Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 546.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 400
3. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 156
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 133.5
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -21

Turnover Differntial
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 2
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 2
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 0
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 0

Total Points Scored
1. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 33
2. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 28
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 27
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 21
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 21

Total Points Allowed
1. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 0
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 7
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 7
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 10
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 13

Total Points Differential
1. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 33
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 20
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 7
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 7
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 6


WORST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 392.0
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 405.5
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 406.0
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 419.5
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 423.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 54.0
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 66.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 75.5
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 100.5
5. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 123.5

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 198.5
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 220.0
3. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 253.5
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 268.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 349.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 707.0
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 688.0
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 636.5
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 627.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 600.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 323.0
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 227.5
3. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 226.5
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 175.5
5. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 164.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 647.5
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 505.5
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 484.5
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 460.5
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 425.0

Total Yards Differential
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : -315
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -264.5
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -230.5
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -181
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : -68.5

Turnover Differntial
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -3
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -2
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : -2
4. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -2
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : -1

Total Points Scored
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 0
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 6
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 6
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 6
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 7

Total Points Allowed
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 48
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 38
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 35
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 20
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 15

Total Points Differential
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -35
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -32
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : -20
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -14
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -6


These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!

** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14

Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
 
agerm73
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 7

Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Vermont Coyotes - Rum - (4-1-0) - 81.69
2. Science Fair - Rum - (4-1-0) - 80.91
3. Cleveland Dawgs - Rum - (3-1-1) - 78.66
4. Nintendo Power - Rum - (3-2-0) - 77.84
5. Windsor Warriors - Rum - (2-3-0) - 75.63
6. Da Beers - Rum - (2-3-0) - 75.44
7. San Francisco 49ers - Rum - (2-3-0) - 73.69
8. Detroit Lions - Rum - (1-3-1) - 72.78
9. Junkyard Rottweilers - Rum - (1-4-0) - 71.50
10. Pittsburgh Hares - Rum - (1-4-0) - 71.06
11. Denver Wolves - Rum - (1-4-0) - 70.91
12. Milwaukee Express - Rum - (0-5-0) - 68.94


BEST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1802.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 1689.5
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1541.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 1528.0
5. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 1261.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 586.0
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 561.0
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 496.0
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 488.0
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 479.5

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1681.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 1210.0
3. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 1133.5
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1120.5
5. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 984.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1110.0
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1125.5
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 1158.5
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 1280.5
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1282.0

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 123.5
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 284.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 402.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 514.5
5. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 533.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 521.5
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 577.0
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 613.5
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 725.0
5. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 841.0

Total Yards Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 692.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 531
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 259
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 91
5. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -43

Turnover Differntial
1. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 5
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 3
3. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 3
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2
5. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1

Total Points Scored
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 83
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 63
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 59
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 58
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 54

Total Points Allowed
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 26
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 34
3. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 38
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 41
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 46

Total Points Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 37
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 21
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 14
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 13
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 11


WORST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 794.5
2. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 1073.5
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1082.5
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 1086.5
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1163.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 121.0
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 263.0
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 277.0
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 299.0
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 363.5

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 431.0
2. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 487.5
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 521.5
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 590.5
5. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 772.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1740.5
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1692.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 1586.5
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 1532.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 1490.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 667.0
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 637.0
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 605.0
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 567.5
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 560.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1294.5
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 1184.5
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1135.5
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1132.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 964.5

Total Yards Differential
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -946
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -529
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : -445.5
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -417
5. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -325

Turnover Differntial
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -6
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -4
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -3
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : -2
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -2

Total Points Scored
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 7
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 22
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 28
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 28
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 30

Total Points Allowed
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 107
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 88
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 81
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 78
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 58

Total Points Differential
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -100
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -59
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -54
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : -30
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -22


These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!

** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14

Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
 
agerm73
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 21

Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Science Fair - Rum - (10-4-0) - 82.97
2. Da Beers - Rum - (8-5-1) - 79.69
3. Nintendo Power - Rum - (7-6-1) - 77.06
4. Windsor Warriors - Rum - (7-7-0) - 76.78
5. San Francisco 49ers - Rum - (7-7-0) - 76.00
6. Vermont Coyotes - Rum - (6-7-0) - 75.25
7. Cleveland Dawgs - Rum - (6-7-1) - 74.38
8. Junkyard Rottweilers - Rum - (5-9-0) - 73.47
9. Detroit Lions - Rum - (3-10-1) - 70.84
10. Denver Wolves - Rum - (4-10-0) - 70.28
11. Milwaukee Express - Rum - (3-10-1) - 69.13
12. Pittsburgh Hares - Rum - (3-11-0) - 68.69


BEST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 5665.5
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 4713.0
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 4327.0
4. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 3899.0
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 3772.0

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 2058.5
2. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1451.5
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 1346.5
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1304.5
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 1151.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 5267.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 3408.5
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 2875.5
4. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 2855.5
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 2792.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 3362.5
2. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 3400.0
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 3513.0
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 3858.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 4015.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 532.0
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 847.0
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1216.0
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 1311.0
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1400.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 2297.0
2. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 2348.5
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 2513.0
4. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 2515.5
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2659.0

Total Yards Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 2303
2. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 927
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 654
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 249
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -369

Turnover Differntial
1. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 8
2. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 8
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 7
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 4

Total Points Scored
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 275
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 241
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 226
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 165
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 144

Total Points Allowed
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 73
2. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 125
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 126
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 129
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 139

Total Points Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 202
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 100
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 97
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 39
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -13


WORST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 3015.0
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 3073.0
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 3087.0
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 3264.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 3489.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 398.5
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 753.0
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 791.5
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 933.5
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 1043.5

Passing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 1431.0
2. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 1917.5
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1960.0
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 2223.5
5. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 2334.0

Total Defensive Yards
1. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 4797.0
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 4740.5
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 4624.5
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 4596.0
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 4479.0

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 2083.0
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1859.5
3. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 1772.5
4. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1655.0
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 1538.5

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 3291.5
2. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 3024.5
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 2868.0
4. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 2824.0
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 2765.0

Total Yards Differential
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -1653.5
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -1581
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -1406
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : -1025
5. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -898.5

Turnover Differntial
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -12
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -10
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -7
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -7
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -4

Total Points Scored
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 51
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 52
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 83
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 95
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 112

Total Points Allowed
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 264
2. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 244
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 241
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 233
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 219

Total Points Differential
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -213
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -189
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -150
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -120
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -76


These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!

** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14

Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
 
jhiggseiu14
offline
Link
 
We deserve that playoff spot smh. We came a few days late.
 
agerm73
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Unless people start beating Sid's Science Fair you will be fighting Da Beers for that spot.
 
jhiggseiu14
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by agerm73
Unless people start beating Sid's Science Fair you will be fighting Da Beers for that spot.


We say yes to any challenge bruh
 
agerm73
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 36

Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Science Fair - Rum - (17-7-0) - 83.41
2. Nintendo Power - Rum - (15-8-1) - 79.88
3. Windsor Warriors - Rum - (14-10-0) - 78.94
4. Da Beers - Rum - (13-10-1) - 78.81
5. Vermont Coyotes - Rum - (12-11-0) - 76.50
6. Junkyard Rottweilers - Rum - (11-12-1) - 76.31
7. Cleveland Dawgs - Rum - (11-12-1) - 75.47
8. San Francisco 49ers - Rum - (11-13-0) - 73.72
9. Detroit Lions - Rum - (5-18-1) - 69.72
10. Pittsburgh Hares - Rum - (6-18-0) - 69.41
11. Denver Wolves - Rum - (5-19-0) - 69.41
12. Milwaukee Express - Rum - (3-20-1) - 68.56


BEST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 10109.5
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 8607.5
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 7931.5
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 7514.5
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 7077.0

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 3351.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2791.0
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 2581.0
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 2520.5
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 2246.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 8900.5
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 5816.5
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 5583.0
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 5350.5
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 5069.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 5578.0
2. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 6371.5
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 6371.5
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 6819.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 7031.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1738.5
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1813.0
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1921.5
4. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 2103.0
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 2253.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 3765.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 3946.5
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 4450.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 4595.5
5. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 4633.0

Total Yards Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 3738
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1936.5
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 1788
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1560
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -466.5

Turnover Differntial
1. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 9
2. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 8
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 7
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 4

Total Points Scored
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 529
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 461
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 427
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 360
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 309

Total Points Allowed
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 170
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 220
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 247
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 249
5. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 267

Total Points Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 309
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 212
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 190
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 160
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : -19


WORST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 5389.0
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 5445.5
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 5618.5
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 6071.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 6156.0

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1209.0
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 1385.0
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 1386.5
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1665.0
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1679.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 2805.0
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 3766.5
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 3882.0
4. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 4002.5
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 4233.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 8526.0
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 8358.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 8242.0
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 8070.5
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 7543.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 3778.5
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 3407.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 3159.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 2948.0
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2873.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 5845.5
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 5440.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 5083.0
4. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 4849.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 4778.5

Total Yards Differential
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -2913
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -2853
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -2455
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -2452
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -1065

Turnover Differntial
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -21
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -16
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -11
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : -10
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -4

Total Points Scored
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 93
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 113
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 157
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 176
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 219

Total Points Allowed
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 473
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 461
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 438
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 417
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 351

Total Points Differential
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -368
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -325
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -297
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -260
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -68


These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!

** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14

Bonus Rank Legend:
+1 Tier Win : 100
+1 Tier Tie : 50
-1 Tier Loss : -100
-1 Tier Tie: -50
+2 Tier Win : 200
+2 Tier Tie : 100
-2 Tier Loss : -200
-2 Tier Tie: -100
 
TyDavis315
offline
Link
 


Thread name goes with the team
 
PhireHawk
offline
Link
 
5th worst rushing defense?

The "El Gazpacho" I knew woulda NEVER let that happen...

smdh...
 
Link
 
Originally posted by PhireHawk
5th worst rushing defense?

The "El Gazpacho" I knew woulda NEVER let that happen...

smdh...


"SB Trips QB Rollout Weak" has given me fits all season. You go inside and you're gonna get hurt. Run outside and my LBs will almost certainly dance the night away with WRs.

Don't worry, I think I have it figured out now. So Nintendo, go ahead and try it
 
TxSteve
Not A Mod
offline
Link
 
Power Rankings Produced by GLB2Scout Tool - http://www.GLB2Scout.com
Rankings Last Updated on Day : 37

Rank - Name - League - (Record) - Rating
1. Science Fair - Rum - (18-7-0) - 83.41
2. Nintendo Power - Rum - (16-8-1) - 80.84
3. Windsor Warriors - Rum - (15-10-0) - 79.72
4. Da Beers - Rum - (14-10-1) - 78.34
5. Junkyard Rottweilers - Rum - (11-13-1) - 75.88
6. Cleveland Dawgs - Rum - (12-12-1) - 75.66
7. Vermont Coyotes - Rum - (12-12-0) - 75.56
8. San Francisco 49ers - Rum - (12-13-0) - 73.88
9. Detroit Lions - Rum - (5-19-1) - 69.81
10. Pittsburgh Hares - Rum - (6-19-0) - 69.78
11. Denver Wolves - Rum - (5-20-0) - 69.13
12. Milwaukee Express - Rum - (3-21-1) - 68.31


BEST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 10752.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 9126.5
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 8530.0
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 7945.0
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 7425.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 3576.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2990.0
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 2887.0
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 2618.5
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 2323.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 9493.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 6136.5
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 5913.5
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 5643.0
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 5188.5

Total Defensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 5861.0
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 6506.5
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 6580.5
4. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 7036.5
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 7462.0

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1784.0
2. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 1911.0
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1921.5
4. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 2302.0
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 2353.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 3950.0
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 4065.5
3. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 4585.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 4753.0
5. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 4796.5

Total Yards Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 4245.5
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2090
3. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 2084
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 1949.5
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : -307.5

Turnover Differntial
1. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 9
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 8
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 7
4. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 7
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 4

Total Points Scored
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 594
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 488
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 472
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 381
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 316

Total Points Allowed
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 180
2. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 223
3. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 249
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 267
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 268

Total Points Differential
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 371
2. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 239
3. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : 205
4. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : 201
5. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : -12


WORST OF STATS

Total Offensive Yards
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 5524.0
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 5694.5
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 5808.0
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 6280.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 6507.5

Rushing Offensive Yards
1. Science Fair (Rookie : Rum) : 1259.0
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 1386.5
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 1417.0
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 1710.5
5. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 1711.0

Passing Offensive Yards
1. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 2931.5
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 3983.5
3. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 4067.0
4. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 4137.5
5. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 4391.0

Total Defensive Yards
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 9124.5
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 8884.5
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 8710.0
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 8420.5
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 8062.5

Rushing Defensive Yards
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 4084.5
2. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 3484.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 3209.0
4. Cleveland Dawgs (Rookie : Rum) : 2980.0
5. Windsor Warriors (Rookie : Rum) : 2971.0

Passing Defensive Yards
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 5972.0
2. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 5760.5
3. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 5675.5
4. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 5109.0
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : 5066.5

Total Yards Differential
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -3360.5
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -3015.5
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -2844.5
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -2612.5
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -962.5

Turnover Differntial
1. Nintendo Power (Rookie : Rum) : -24
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -16
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -10
4. Da Beers (Rookie : Rum) : -8
5. San Francisco 49ers (Rookie : Rum) : -4

Total Points Scored
1. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 100
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 116
3. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 157
4. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 176
5. Junkyard Rottweilers (Rookie : Rum) : 229

Total Points Allowed
1. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : 518
2. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : 503
3. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : 478
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : 424
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : 378

Total Points Differential
1. Pittsburgh Hares (Rookie : Rum) : -387
2. Milwaukee Express (Rookie : Rum) : -378
3. Denver Wolves (Rookie : Rum) : -342
4. Detroit Lions (Rookie : Rum) : -267
5. Vermont Coyotes (Rookie : Rum) : -95


These lists are based solely on stats and are in no way meant to offend anyone! Fun only! Enjoy!

** Rating Formula:
100 - (LadderRank(*2) + RecordRank(*2) + OpponentRecordRank(*2) + BonusRank(*2) + OffenseTotalYardsRank + TotalYardsDif + TotalPointsDif + OffenseTurnoversRank + OffenseTotalPointsRank + DefensiveTotalYardsRank + DefensiveTurnoversRank + DefensiveTotalPointsRank) / 14
 
Link
 
Those stats take into account all games played including ladder right?
 
TxSteve
Not A Mod
offline
Link
 
Yes, I believe so. for league only you have to look at matchup screens
Edited by TxSteve on Oct 5, 2015 07:43:38
 
Link
 
Yeah I got lit the fuck up on some of those ladder games!
 
thomas240
offline
Link
 
when can we look for a new team
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.