Warrior General Games

I know this sound dumb but think about it. It would make a few more FB's more relevant in the game since FB can not be place on the depth chart at HB. And help out the O on the same token and possibly making it a little harder to game for the D..

By doing this it would make HB/FB and would allow FB to be place at the HB spot on the depth chart. The cost would be the same so no take advantage or the flex system making a HB for the FB price like in GLB1

Why would they be more relevant because they cost more?

Originally posted by killershrew
Why would they be more relevant because they cost more?


sorry I hit send before I was done.

No thanks fullbacks are already pretty boring. No need to paymore

He is saying pay more so he can use them as a running back, and there would be no reason not to if they cost the same. Not saying I agree or disagree, just clarifying.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
He is saying pay more so he can use them as a running back, and there would be no reason not to if they cost the same. Not saying I agree or disagree, just clarifying.

Yeah but why would you put a fullback at running back?

Originally posted by underdog13
Yeah but why would you put a fullback at running back?

So you can justify raising the price...

Originally posted by underdog13
Yeah but why would you put a fullback at running back?

Achievements

Fb rushes and routes suck I've been told yet achievements for using both

But we can't expect any real improvements because WB is stretched too thin and doesn't have proper staff to address the concerns or even discuss with its paying customers

FB's are kind of sad in this game, but raising the flex cost isn't the answer.

As an owner of four fullbacks, no thank you.

buffing them with out the raising of the cost.