User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Disbanded League Forums > Iron League > Willcoll's week 2 predictions
Page:
 
willcoll
offline
Link
 
Not sure if I'm competing with Ticca or anything but decided I'll make my predictions for week 2. If I am competing so far we are tied.

Slim Kims V Beast:
The championship rematch as early as week 2. The Beast blewout the Slim Kims on the final stage but I'm not so sure the result will be the same in week 2. Slim Kims 14 - Beast 13.

Sharks v Surge:
The Sharks may be last season's Huntsman Spiders. A good team but have too tough of a schedule and aren't quite good enough to get to the next level. Surge on the other hand may be the best team in the league. Look out Miami. Surge 42 - Sharks 0

WARHAMMER v Hitmen:
Two of the new teams in this league that nobody knows about. Both had a rough start and the WARHAMMER lost to a CPU team in week 1. That me the indication that the WARHAMMER are going to have a long tough season. Hitmen 17 - WARHAMMER 3

Thunder v Bullets:
No comment necessary so I will predict the same score the bulldogs lost by in the playoffs to annoy the former bulldogs now on the Thunder. Thunder 76 - Bullets 0

Freebirds v Red Devils:
Ravenswood has one of the best names in the league, but also one of the worst teams. Freebirds 48 - Red Devils 3

Abogados v Miners:
Don't sleep on Atlanta. They are going to be the surprise team this season and may make a run for the wildcard or the division. The Miners don't have what it takes to stop them. Abogados 10 - Miners 7
 
millr
offline
Link
 
I have warhammer winning as well as beasts otherwise same. Although i have the beasts winning by more than 1
 
willcoll
offline
Link
 
I actually have Slim Kims winning with a walk off field goal with 1 second left in regulation. Should be a close game.
 
Ticca
offline
Link
 
We are competing haha. I agree but I think that the Creek Valley Beasts will take it 24-21.
 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Both teams have some bad chemistry going at the moment.

Re-match later in the season shouldn't have that as an issue.

 
Ticca
offline
Link
 
I agree, it shall be good at the end. and willcoll I agree with your picks besides the first on.
 
Frank Booth
offline
Link
 
My Prediction .. I'll fall asleep while watching replay by half time
 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Frank Booth
My Prediction .. I'll fall asleep while watching replay by half time




Frank, are you an old guy like me?



 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by willcoll
I actually have Slim Kims winning with a walk off field goal with 1 second left in regulation. Should be a close game.


willcoll loves to make these dramatic predictions.

Unfortunately, with each teams chemistry I don't see it.

Obviously, I have to predict a CVB win.

I'm thinking the rematch is the better game (due to current chem), but we'll see.

Edited by Xars on Jul 9, 2014 17:07:20
 
willcoll
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Xars
willcoll loves to make these dramatic predictions.

Unfortunately, with each teams chemistry I don't see it.


Your right, I do love making those types of predictions. But I think its possible here. 2 of 3 of our games last season ended very close, so why not this one? Its not like we had high chem in last seasons week 1 game witch was decided by a single point.
 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by willcoll
Your right, I do love making those types of predictions. But I think its possible here. 2 of 3 of our games last season ended very close, so why not this one? Its not like we had high chem in last seasons week 1 game witch was decided by a single point.


We didn't but it was the same low value for each team, thus a net neutral.

I think. Then again, who knows..

 
Rychyrd
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Xars
Frank, are you an old guy like me?


ANCIENT

Edited by Rychyrd on Jul 9, 2014 19:40:34
 
Frank Booth
offline
Link
 
HEY!!
Just cuz I remember having to count the rings before answering the phone dont make me ancient.
 
willcoll
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Frank Booth
HEY!!
Just cuz I remember having to count the rings before answering the phone dont make me ancient.


You had to count rings before answering the phone? Why?
 
Frank Booth
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by willcoll
You had to count rings before answering the phone? Why?


LOL
They were called Party Lines. Were pretty common in rural areas back in the day. All the phones on the line rang and the number of rings told you which house/number was being called. And yes you could listen in on the neighbors phone calls if you wanted to provided they didn't hear you pick up.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.