Warrior General Games

As a general rule of thumb, How many S* can you carry without killing Cap space or Team Depth

well considering you can use all your cap space with out S* i guess 0......

there is soo many options regarding this subject, there is type of S* that varies cost and if you want to run high and med contracts.

if you run medium contracts 3 should be possible depending of if your team is have wage trait based

Thanks for input
Variables in contracts was what was killing me in trying to figure the math.

Originally posted by Frank Booth
Thanks for input
Variables in contracts was what was killing me in trying to figure the math.

You really can't.

Unless they're clones, you're likely going to see all different salaries for everybody playing the same position.

ThatsOriginally posted by Xavori
You really can't.

Unless they're clones, you're likely going to see all different salaries for everybody playing the same position.

Thats what I kinda figured out .. fairly sure I havent over committed and if so will just have to improvise adapt and overcome

Basically, you can easily have 3 (4 if no QBs/HBs) on a full roster with a bunch of medium contracts, as long as people didn't go crazy with traits.

If you want more superstars ( http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/roster/694 runs 11 total), you need to go with a 36-40 man roster, and a handful of low contracts. It's possible, success is doable, but there's less room for error.

Originally posted by Xavori
You really can't.

Unless they're clones, you're likely going to see all different salaries for everybody playing the same position.

Someone has a spread sheet floating round which lets you input all the traits etc for your roster.

That being said 3 is probably really pushing it if you still want to have 43 players on your roster with at least medium contracts. Though teams are making it work with 4 and more and running with fewer players.

Thanks for the info fellas

i think tha tthe highest numbers of S* a team has had with out using low contracts was the 9 Hawaii Bulls originally had, but even we got rid of one

Originally posted by Merik
i think tha tthe highest numbers of S* a team has had with out using low contracts was the 9 Hawaii Bulls originally had, but even we got rid of one

DADDY currently has 10. 'Course, 4 are o-line and 4 are d-line, so that makes it a bit easier for them salary wise.

(also makes them a pain in the ass to DC against because they're basically blitz-proof)

Originally posted by Xavori
DADDY currently has 10. 'Course, 4 are o-line and 4 are d-line, so that makes it a bit easier for them salary wise.

(also makes them a pain in the ass to DC against because they're basically blitz-proof)

yea but 4 of them isn't in same tier'

edit: and sackproof...look at at hawaii bulls Lucky has been sacked 19 times with the run focussed line, 6 of them in a game where boss screwed up the gameplan

Originally posted by Merik
yea but 4 of them isn't in same tier'

edit: and sackproof...look at at hawaii bulls Lucky has been sacked 19 times with the run focussed line, 6 of them in a game where boss screwed up the gameplan

not that the threat of a fantastic running game impacts that at all. Cleveland laughs at 19 sacks on 627 attempts.

yea and a pass blocking line cleveland got doesn't affect it?