http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/74601/pbp
8 quarters long. Eight.
Though it should have ended in 7.
8 quarters long. Eight.
Though it should have ended in 7.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > 8th Quarter
dlcurt
offline
offline
Are you kidding me, that was the longest game I've ever watched.... 2 missed FG's... 2 TD's by KR's over 8 quarters.... that was hard to lose.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
574 yards lost to 378 yards lol
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
574 yards lost to 378 yards lol
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
Both teams have pretty good conditioning apparently
Oh no. If you watch the 6th quarter, everyone is down at laughably low levels of energy/morale.
Both teams have pretty good conditioning apparently
Oh no. If you watch the 6th quarter, everyone is down at laughably low levels of energy/morale.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
That shit happened to us in season 1 championship game against Zorp.
I thought they were going to fix it then?
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
That shit happened to us in season 1 championship game against Zorp.
I thought they were going to fix it then?
Edited by Homage on Jun 27, 2014 12:32:41
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
You get 1 timeout in OT, you had already used it. I guess you could argue as to why you at least didn't try the FG after the TO though.
It is, Yeah...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/74601/3241471 but this is another example of broken end-of-game logic
You get 1 timeout in OT, you had already used it. I guess you could argue as to why you at least didn't try the FG after the TO though.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
You get 1 timeout in OT, you had already used it. I guess you could argue as to why you at least didn't try the FG after the TO though.
uhm, thats my point
You get 1 timeout in OT, you had already used it. I guess you could argue as to why you at least didn't try the FG after the TO though.
uhm, thats my point
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
uhm, thats my point
My bad, I thought you were upset they didn't rush to the line and spike it. If I'm not mistaken I've seen teams do it faster than 9 seconds. At least you still won unlike a lot of other teams who have got screwed by it.
uhm, thats my point
My bad, I thought you were upset they didn't rush to the line and spike it. If I'm not mistaken I've seen teams do it faster than 9 seconds. At least you still won unlike a lot of other teams who have got screwed by it.
Evil Sports Agent
offline
offline
Two rule questions:
1st) How do you determine, who gets the ball at the beginning of an overtime period?
(5th: Erkner, 6th: Storms, 7th: Storms, 8th: Erkner)
It is probably random for the first OT period, right?
2nd) What happens in the NFL (and yes I know we are not in the NFL, still...) if an overtime period ends with no score (playoff game)? Do they kickoff or do they continue the currrent drive?
1st) How do you determine, who gets the ball at the beginning of an overtime period?
(5th: Erkner, 6th: Storms, 7th: Storms, 8th: Erkner)
It is probably random for the first OT period, right?
2nd) What happens in the NFL (and yes I know we are not in the NFL, still...) if an overtime period ends with no score (playoff game)? Do they kickoff or do they continue the currrent drive?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
