Warrior General Games

QBs > anything

It's because QB's get bonuses on all their major stats based on CDOGS bogus strength-of-schedule + teams throw so much at the top of the HoF.

6 YPC is amazing for a HB but it doesnt matter when QB's get 10k+ yards without trying a season and their stats are inflated by the broken ladder formula

Let's all remember it's really an Allstar list and not a HoF (hilarious they have not changed this yet, as if they are so embarrassed at their mistake they just want to stand firm)

Originally posted by Laggo
It's because QB's get bonuses on all their major stats based on CDOGS bogus strength-of-schedule + teams throw so much at the top of the HoF.

6 YPC is amazing for a HB but it doesnt matter when QB's get 10k+ yards without trying a season and their stats are inflated by the broken ladder formula

Let's all remember it's really an Allstar list and not a HoF (hilarious they have not changed this yet, as if they are so embarrassed at their mistake they just want to stand firm)

Word it is the hallstar list.

I've been saying this the entire time. The problem is they don't put intangibles...only stats. The best CB in football history was Deon Sanders. He wouldn't sniff the top 100 in this game because nobody threw to his side.

They also need to make other stats just as valuable as QB stats...like pancakes, % of receptions allowed, etc...

Originally posted by jamz
Word it is the hallstar list.

lol

I like it!

I think it is great that the current top LB's in rookie are:

Gage Blackburn LB: 1 Pass TD
10 Rush Yards
1 Cake
5.5 Pass yards
3 Pass Attempt

#2 LB : 244 Pass Yards, 1 pass TD, 1 cake, 10.5 rush yards, 64 pass attempt

#3 LB: 32.5 receiving yards, 1 cake, 4 first downs, 1.5 yAC, 4 receptions

I wish I could see their builds - because I would love to get some clone linebackers on my team who can put up those kinds of numbers

Originally posted by TxSteve
I like it!



ikr, its almost as stupid as your subscription plan suggestion

Originally posted by nortobc
I've been saying this the entire time. The problem is they don't put intangibles...only stats. The best CB in football history was Deon Sanders. He wouldn't sniff the top 100 in this game because nobody threw to his side.

They also need to make other stats just as valuable as QB stats...like pancakes, % of receptions allowed, etc...

Also, GLB2 CB's don't get elusive running which was a big part of why people didn't throw at him.

He really wasn't any more likely than any other top cover CB to get an interception. The difference is that when he did, he was an extreme threat to score.

Same with Deion and punt returning. CB's might get great return awareness in GLB2, but they don't have any of the other skills they need to really excel at the job.

Originally posted by TxSteve
I like it!

I think it is great that the current top LB's in rookie are:

Gage Blackburn LB: 1 Pass TD
10 Rush Yards
1 Cake
5.5 Pass yards
3 Pass Attempt

#2 LB : 244 Pass Yards, 1 pass TD, 1 cake, 10.5 rush yards, 64 pass attempt

#3 LB: 32.5 receiving yards, 1 cake, 4 first downs, 1.5 yAC, 4 receptions

I wish I could see their builds - because I would love to get some clone linebackers on my team who can put up those kinds of numbers



Yeah, rushing LB's should be rated higher.

Originally posted by Corndog
Yeah, rushing LB's should be rated higher.



luv corndug

I dunno if it is really that out of whack between QB/HB/WR.

Randall Cobb sits in 5th for Sophmore offense and hes among 5 different WR's touching the ball on offense.

The QB's above him are obviously solo artists.


In seasoned 5 of the top 10 are HB's. The other 5 are QB's. Among the 5 HB's in the top 10, 4 share carries with each other. The other shares carries with another HB as well. None of the 5 QB's are part of a 2 man rotation.

Sure I could say that looks a bit unfair to my WR down at 21 but I don't force him endzone touches or really even force him the ball at all in my gameplan.

The only guys really getting the shaft in the O HoF are the blockers obviously. But when was the last time you heard of an olinemen or blocking FB winning the MVP? That is more of a position award.

I guess what I am saying is build up your conditioning.

Originally posted by Corndog
Yeah, rushing LB's should be rated higher.



I want to give a thumps up. +1

I hope for the all star games they pick the best player(s) of the positions. If thats the case, then the general HOF is irrelevant and only the position list count.

Probably just ported over the awesome GLB1 player ranking formulas.