How much success have people seen in the pbp from this skill?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > Pump Fake
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by Laggo
How much success have people seen in the pbp from this skill?
Only works against zone...zone sux hard...no one runs zone...pump fake useless imo
How much success have people seen in the pbp from this skill?
Only works against zone...zone sux hard...no one runs zone...pump fake useless imo
Originally posted by peeti
Only works against zone...
is this true?
I don't see it fire all that often, but i don't remember the defenses it was running against when i used to have a QB with PF...
Only works against zone...
is this true?
I don't see it fire all that often, but i don't remember the defenses it was running against when i used to have a QB with PF...
hiimjake
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
is this true?
I don't see it fire all that often, but i don't remember the defenses it was running against when i used to have a QB with PF...
Says it right in the description
is this true?
I don't see it fire all that often, but i don't remember the defenses it was running against when i used to have a QB with PF...
Says it right in the description
peeti
offline
offline
Pump Fake
Next Level:
The QB makes a quick fake throwing motion, potentially fooling zone defenders into thinking a pass is coming.
Ability type: Active
Powered by: Pass Awareness
Activation condition: Passing vs zone defenders while no targets are open.
Activation chance: up to 15%
While active: Chance to fake opposing zone defenders.
Why would I make sth up? Still works vs the 2 Under plays vs the safeties tho
Next Level:
The QB makes a quick fake throwing motion, potentially fooling zone defenders into thinking a pass is coming.
Ability type: Active
Powered by: Pass Awareness
Activation condition: Passing vs zone defenders while no targets are open.
Activation chance: up to 15%
While active: Chance to fake opposing zone defenders.
Why would I make sth up? Still works vs the 2 Under plays vs the safeties tho
Edited by peeti on Feb 17, 2014 13:31:02
Edited by peeti on Feb 17, 2014 13:30:09
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by Laggo
How much success have people seen in the pbp from this skill?
it works hilariously well against zone, have a qb i been testing it, procs pretty decently and has a potential to fool all zone defenders. I had it proc on 4-5 guys a few times and they just stop dead for a second
How much success have people seen in the pbp from this skill?
it works hilariously well against zone, have a qb i been testing it, procs pretty decently and has a potential to fool all zone defenders. I had it proc on 4-5 guys a few times and they just stop dead for a second
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
its because typically in man, the DB is looking at the WR and in zone he is looking at the QB.
i like how it is tbh.
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
its because typically in man, the DB is looking at the WR and in zone he is looking at the QB.
i like how it is tbh.
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
more realistic the way it is.. only the ppl watching the QB should be fooled.
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
more realistic the way it is.. only the ppl watching the QB should be fooled.
Laggo
offline
offline
Originally posted by USC_Trojans
it works hilariously well against zone, have a qb i been testing it, procs pretty decently and has a potential to fool all zone defenders. I had it proc on 4-5 guys a few times and they just stop dead for a second
this is kind of what i was thinking, it sounds silly in design
it works hilariously well against zone, have a qb i been testing it, procs pretty decently and has a potential to fool all zone defenders. I had it proc on 4-5 guys a few times and they just stop dead for a second
this is kind of what i was thinking, it sounds silly in design
Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
Actually, it is working properly because the DBs in man are looking at the WR. What is garbage is how useless zone is in the game. Zone should be much harder to pass against than man. The problem is the DBs have horrible reaction time when the ball is thrown. THey just sit there with their finger up their butt, or just keep running down the field. Maybe zone will be a better defense to run when the players' skills mature?
I don't think it should be zone only. That's some garbage.
Actually, it is working properly because the DBs in man are looking at the WR. What is garbage is how useless zone is in the game. Zone should be much harder to pass against than man. The problem is the DBs have horrible reaction time when the ball is thrown. THey just sit there with their finger up their butt, or just keep running down the field. Maybe zone will be a better defense to run when the players' skills mature?
Edited by nortobc on Feb 17, 2014 14:19:09
Edited by nortobc on Feb 17, 2014 14:18:44
Edited by nortobc on Feb 17, 2014 14:18:19
Originally posted by nortobc
Zone should be much harder to pass against than man.
wrong again...
Zone should be much harder to pass against than man.
wrong again...
pottsman
offline
offline
I would think it would still be semi useful against nonzone teams, since the safeties are still often in a C1 or C2 shell. It won't shake the corner, but it could help get out of a double coverage situation.
Originally posted by pottsman
I would think it would still be semi useful against nonzone teams, since the safeties are still often in a C1 or C2 shell. It won't shake the corner, but it could help get out of a double coverage situation.
Since when is double coverage a problem?
I would think it would still be semi useful against nonzone teams, since the safeties are still often in a C1 or C2 shell. It won't shake the corner, but it could help get out of a double coverage situation.
Since when is double coverage a problem?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
