Edited by CKeppelrun on Feb 13, 2014 03:04:20
Rambo
offline
offline
if we're being realistic here, very few people create linemen. Unless they're making them for the team they own, or a buddies team. So it's kind of fuckery that a player can sign to a CPU team, get stuck with no o-linemen. I think CPU should have at least a full line of starters, even if NPC / CPU players. Don't sign 8 WR's if you only have 2 linemen. Definitely worth improving in the future cuz a lot of new players are going to sign to unproductive teams and get disinterested cuz their WR is suddenly played OT.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by CKeppelrun
if we're being realistic here, very few people create linemen. Unless they're making them for the team they own, or a buddies team. So it's kind of fuckery that a player can sign to a CPU team, get stuck with no o-linemen. I think CPU should have at least a full line of starters, even if NPC / CPU players. Don't sign 8 WR's if you only have 2 linemen. Definitely worth improving in the future cuz a lot of new players are going to sign to unproductive teams and get disinterested cuz their WR is suddenly played OT.
What i'd like to see is a team full (over the 43) of cpu players in D-League. Have the CPU players have 10 conditioning to compensate for playing time. When a player signs to a CPU team it cuts the respective CPU player first.
if we're being realistic here, very few people create linemen. Unless they're making them for the team they own, or a buddies team. So it's kind of fuckery that a player can sign to a CPU team, get stuck with no o-linemen. I think CPU should have at least a full line of starters, even if NPC / CPU players. Don't sign 8 WR's if you only have 2 linemen. Definitely worth improving in the future cuz a lot of new players are going to sign to unproductive teams and get disinterested cuz their WR is suddenly played OT.
What i'd like to see is a team full (over the 43) of cpu players in D-League. Have the CPU players have 10 conditioning to compensate for playing time. When a player signs to a CPU team it cuts the respective CPU player first.
pottsman
offline
offline
Aren't CPU teams supposed to cut innactive players, to keep the d-league rosters full of people who care?
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by pottsman
Aren't CPU teams supposed to cut innactive players, to keep the d-league rosters full of people who care?
Does it really matter though if you have 3 QB's and a HB playing O-Line?
Aren't CPU teams supposed to cut innactive players, to keep the d-league rosters full of people who care?
Does it really matter though if you have 3 QB's and a HB playing O-Line?
Originally posted by Corndog
There's two offensive linemen on the entire team. Somebody has to play there.
As a D League team, how does this happen? Are there no checks to make sure they don't oversign certain positions, and make sure to not cut CPUs from under subscribed positions?
doobas™
There's two offensive linemen on the entire team. Somebody has to play there.
As a D League team, how does this happen? Are there no checks to make sure they don't oversign certain positions, and make sure to not cut CPUs from under subscribed positions?
doobas™
Originally posted by doobas
As a D League team, how does this happen? Are there no checks to make sure they don't oversign certain positions, and make sure to not cut CPUs from under subscribed positions?
doobas™
Yes there used to be checks to make sure they stayed within recommended levels. People complained that there were HB slots on but they couldnt sign even though there were CPU players. I said "a team with no line and a bunch of HBs and QBs would be awful". People kept pushing for it so we did it. And now its awful.
As a D League team, how does this happen? Are there no checks to make sure they don't oversign certain positions, and make sure to not cut CPUs from under subscribed positions?
doobas™
Yes there used to be checks to make sure they stayed within recommended levels. People complained that there were HB slots on but they couldnt sign even though there were CPU players. I said "a team with no line and a bunch of HBs and QBs would be awful". People kept pushing for it so we did it. And now its awful.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Yes there used to be checks to make sure they stayed within recommended levels. People complained that there were HB slots on but they couldnt sign even though there were CPU players. I said "a team with no line and a bunch of HBs and QBs would be awful". People kept pushing for it so we did it. And now its awful.
What if you upped the teams limits in D-league. 3 QB per team, 3 HB per team, 3 TE.. ect. and then removed the overall player cap and just used the position ones.
Yes there used to be checks to make sure they stayed within recommended levels. People complained that there were HB slots on but they couldnt sign even though there were CPU players. I said "a team with no line and a bunch of HBs and QBs would be awful". People kept pushing for it so we did it. And now its awful.
What if you upped the teams limits in D-league. 3 QB per team, 3 HB per team, 3 TE.. ect. and then removed the overall player cap and just used the position ones.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
