User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Bugs > Quarter Man - Over Smoke bug
Page:
 
spindoctor02
offline
Link
 
According to the description of the play "Over Smoke" from the Man-Quarter list of plays, it indicates that it's for 4-5 WR Pass Defense. There are 5 men listed for coverage (CB1, CB2, CB3, FS, SS). So, why do they only cover 3 people?

CB1 + FS => WR1
CB2 + SS => WR2
CB3 => WR3

Leaving WR4 and WR5 completely uncovered. Either the coverages for the FS and SS are wrong, or the description needs to change to something much less than 4-5 WR.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/21827/1098162
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/21827/1100002
 
Asheme
offline
Link
 
working as intended.
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Edited by JcWildcat on Feb 12, 2014 16:02:26
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by spindoctor02
According to the description of the play "Over Smoke" from the Man-Quarter list of plays, it indicates that it's for 4-5 WR Pass Defense. There are 5 men listed for coverage (CB1, CB2, CB3, FS, SS). So, why do they only cover 3 people?

CB1 + FS => WR1
CB2 + SS => WR2
CB3 => WR3

Leaving WR4 and WR5 completely uncovered. Either the coverages for the FS and SS are wrong, or the description needs to change to something much less than 4-5 WR.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/21827/1098162
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/21827/1100002


Correct.
 
Asheme
offline
Link
 
Edited by JcWildcat on Feb 12, 2014 16:02:42
 
-Phaytle-
offline
Link
 
Edited by JcWildcat on Feb 12, 2014 16:03:10
 
AirMcMVP
Mod
offline
Link
 
I suspect Asheme was saying WAI in response to this thread: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5135436

Over Smoke is a play that is clearly bugged.
 
spindoctor02
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
I suspect Asheme was saying WAI in response to this thread: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5135436

Over Smoke is a play that is clearly bugged.


So, bhall makes a post about a bugged defensive play, and corndog responds right away that he'll get it fixed. However, this play has apparently been reported as bugged since the start and still isn't fixed?

GG GLB2. GG

 
AirMcMVP
Mod
offline
Link
 
Could be fixed and not yet uploaded. Unfortunately its on my list on unusable plays for now.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by spindoctor02
So, bhall makes a post about a bugged defensive play, and corndog responds right away that he'll get it fixed. However, this play has apparently been reported as bugged since the start and still isn't fixed?

GG GLB2. GG


Yes, I only care about bugs that bhall notices.

 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
On a serious note, I'm busy writing code that should make man defense logic work without being hard coded, meaning that these kind of screw ups shouldn't really happen as much.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Then again, other kinds of screw ups are likely, so whenever it is "released", it will likely be an opt in feature until it seems to work.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Yes, I only care about bugs that bhall notices.



Don't worry guys just pm me and I'll make a thread.

Wait my league team stats thread still sitting there.
 
Corndog
Admin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Corndog
Then again, other kinds of screw ups are likely, so whenever it is "released", it will likely be an opt in feature until it seems to work.


Though, so far, I'm really happy with the outcome of my testing.

I'll need to add more code to force a bypass for special circumstances like forcing a double team, or dog blitz, etc...but Over Smoke seems to reliably cover everybody in every formation.
 
Adderfist
offline
Link
 
Can we have an adjustment in cb coverage so they play in the correct technique near/in the endzone?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.