Warrior General Games

^^^

...how do we feel about that?

I'm of mixed opinion because the sim does change every season.

On the other hand, "Hall of Fame" usually is for a career leading player, not a player who had a good season.

Thoughts?

dislike

doubt rookies can get on there too

Its strange, when I click on my players Bio page it list him a different rank than when I actually go to the HOF page.

You sure? Cuz everyone is in the same spots?

Originally posted by bhall43
You sure? Cuz everyone is in the same spots?

My HB that was #1 in the HoF last season for STs hasn't gotten anything going this season and is sitting at 19,901 on the STs HoF on his bio right now.

BIO Ranking totally broken...

Then again, so is my LB:

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/11740

He's sitting at 32nd on the HoF when you view it, but his STs HoF ranking is also 19,901.

So I don't know what is going on.

Originally posted by peeti
BIO Ranking totally broken...

pretty much this.

I figured it just being overall was kind of pointless.

GLB's rankings is basically stagnant from when something was stupidly imbalanced, and the only people cracking into it are players that get spammed 200 times a game in regional pro or something.

Season to season stats kind of aren't really comparable.

I thought it would keep it more interesting and fresh if it was actually different each season and every player had a legitimate chance.

That said, adding a "career" thing would be easy enough down the line if the current season to season thing isn't well received.

I like it.
But I think it should probably be called something like "All-Pro Rankings" or something instead of HoF if it's a season by season thing.

...but then it has absolutely nothing to do with a HoF?

Originally posted by Corndog
I figured it just being overall was kind of pointless.

GLB's rankings is basically stagnant from when something was stupidly imbalanced, and the only people cracking into it are players that get spammed 200 times a game in regional pro or something.

Season to season stats kind of aren't really comparable.

I was thinking a "class of" HoF would work better. You compete against the same group and your stats aren't compared to players who were created in other seasons...

I guess the problem with that is do you take the season that they first started playing, or the season that they stopped playing, because bots don't automatically age like they do in GLB1.

Originally posted by Corndog
I thought it would keep it more interesting and fresh if it was actually different each season and every player had a legitimate chance.

That said, adding a "career" thing would be easy enough down the line if the current season to season thing isn't well received.

I agree, having the S1 bots at the top for their entire life because they've played more games doesn't make sense.