Time Trial
offline
offline
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by pottsman
How the hell is he not down by contact?
Alpine bought the rights to Bort's cheat button, ldo.
How the hell is he not down by contact?
Alpine bought the rights to Bort's cheat button, ldo.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Probably cost me the game. Alpine ends up scoring a FG with 7 seconds left in OT.
MileHighShoes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/12636/2294729
One for the good guys!
Lol, dat double team tackle.
Was that just me, or did the CB hit the WR into the FS who got the KL on the WR?
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/12636/2294729
One for the good guys!
Lol, dat double team tackle.
Was that just me, or did the CB hit the WR into the FS who got the KL on the WR?
Originally posted by Time Trial
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/12636/2294729
One for the good guys!
wtb injuries
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/12636/2294729
One for the good guys!
wtb injuries
Originally posted by Time Trial
Probably cost me the game. Alpine ends up scoring a FG with 7 seconds left in OT.
How did that cost you the game? The ten yards he perhaps shouldn't have gotten being down by contact? The interception is undoubtedly correct and we didn't score on that drive. And we were also well within FG range for the last 2:50 of OT.
Probably cost me the game. Alpine ends up scoring a FG with 7 seconds left in OT.
How did that cost you the game? The ten yards he perhaps shouldn't have gotten being down by contact? The interception is undoubtedly correct and we didn't score on that drive. And we were also well within FG range for the last 2:50 of OT.
Edited by cavalier on Jan 27, 2014 07:48:48
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by cavalier
How did that cost you the game? The ten yards he perhaps shouldn't have gotten being down by contact? The interception is undoubtedly correct and we didn't score on that drive. And we were also well within FG range for the last 2:50 of OT.
Obviously it was a catch for a 10 yard gain for a first down in the red zone.
How did that cost you the game? The ten yards he perhaps shouldn't have gotten being down by contact? The interception is undoubtedly correct and we didn't score on that drive. And we were also well within FG range for the last 2:50 of OT.
Obviously it was a catch for a 10 yard gain for a first down in the red zone.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Obviously it was a catch for a 10 yard gain for a first down in the red zone.
Obviously it was never a catch as that would have made it a fumble and fumble recovery, not KL and Int
Obviously it was a catch for a 10 yard gain for a first down in the red zone.
Obviously it was never a catch as that would have made it a fumble and fumble recovery, not KL and Int
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by cavalier
Obviously it was never a catch as that would have made it a fumble and fumble recovery, not KL and Int
Obviously it was a catch and down by contact before the tackle, and obviously I would have run the ball in on the next play. Obviously.
Obviously it was never a catch as that would have made it a fumble and fumble recovery, not KL and Int
Obviously it was a catch and down by contact before the tackle, and obviously I would have run the ball in on the next play. Obviously.
Donqueodie
offline
offline
Time Trial, what are you looking at? Do you not see the ball pop loose before your guy goes down? If anyone is down by contact it's Alpine.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by Donqueodie
Time Trial, what are you looking at? Do you not see the ball pop loose before your guy goes down? If anyone is down by contact it's Alpine.
Sure, if you believe "the graphics".
Time Trial, what are you looking at? Do you not see the ball pop loose before your guy goes down? If anyone is down by contact it's Alpine.
Sure, if you believe "the graphics".
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
