User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Bugs > Safety Positioning in Strike Spy 2-4WR Coverage
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/3159/346917

Not sure if that is public or not, but the positioning in this play is not the same as the positioning when I chose this play in the playbook.

It featured 3 deep: FS CB5 SS

But once we get in the play, they do not line up where they are supposed to...
Bug?
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Even if its not a bug, shouldn't the deep 3 cover WRs before they cover HB/FB?
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
Well they're lined up across from who they end up covering... so that part isn't a bug but I'm not sure what the deal is with them double covering WR2 and the FS not just picking up WR3 as he would've been aligned to do.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by o The Boss x
Well they're lined up across from who they end up covering... so that part isn't a bug but I'm not sure what the deal is with them double covering WR2 and the FS not just picking up WR3 as he would've been aligned to do.


hence post #2... if I was a safety lost in my coverage assingments, I would be more likely to pickup the WR streaking downfield before I peer into the backfield...
Edited by Jampy2.0 on Dec 15, 2013 00:04:15
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
Yeah I was agreeing with ya. I'm interested to see the answer too
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
another example

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/3049/389047
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.