User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > s34 Conferences
Page:
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Ouch. Zeta looks brutal and Alpha looks like a cakewalk. *sigh*
 
kwankwan
offline
Link
 
Without knowing anything about the new promotes, I think Zeta got the weaker pro teams, though.

It actually looks fairly even to me this time around... maybe a slight edge to Zeta due to the one extra S33 WL team.
 
evileyez
Tester
offline
Link
 
i believe it goes "conference your affiliation is in" > "the other conf"
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by evileyez
i believe it goes "conference your affiliation is in" > "the other conf"


so they are both greater than eachother


that's some deep shit
 
evileyez
Tester
offline
Link
 
all is water
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kwankwan
Without knowing anything about the new promotes, I think Zeta got the weaker pro teams, though.

I thought the opposite, although that assumption is based on D9, Graz, and TKW getting less attention than their parent teams.
 
JT_HOOD
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Not sure cakewalk is how i'd describe alpha

Asau, Cox, Hogwarts, SF, VDA, and Graz are solid

Mix in Padre/GCV/Miami who are good for some wins and a few upsets

Zeta has

Odessa, Portland, HHWC, Cinci, as for sure bets

Mix in Dirty Island ( was in final 4 last season but needs to earn respect after getting blown out), Richey, Dogs of War, SSM, Carthage

Seem fairly even
 
mwoods07
offline
Link
 
Curious..do you think the conferences are done at random with a program...or do you think someone in management actually spends any time trying to put teams in certain conferences based on certain criteria? Obviously they wouldn't do it for all the leagues, so not sure if WL would be any different...
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mwoods07
Curious..do you think the conferences are done at random with a program...or do you think someone in management actually spends any time trying to put teams in certain conferences based on certain criteria? Obviously they wouldn't do it for all the leagues, so not sure if WL would be any different...

Random. At least they split the playoff teams, though. I remember one season where 10 playoff teams ended up in the same conference, which I think is why Bort changed it.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
^Yup. The WL conference sorting change was a GLB userbase suggestion that got implemented.
Edited by InRomoWeTrust on Mar 18, 2013 11:22:37
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Yeah, it's not quite as bad as I thought. Portland + Cincinnati + Odessa + HHWC is brutal, whereas Asau is the only team in Alpha I'd put that high, but after that both conferences drop off precipitously. If there is as much parity below that as I suspect, then it should be a fun season.
 
bobleck
one
offline
Link
 
Bloodweiser will make a little noise. A little.
 
seahawk10
Last name Wilson
offline
Link
 
They should allow the conference winners from the previous season to 'pick teams'. Kinda like choosing teams in hoops, but instead of choosing the best for your team you pick the weaker squads.

I am guessing Sumatra would be a first round choice.
Edited by seahawk10 on Mar 18, 2013 12:13:54
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by seahawk10
They should allow the conference winners from the previous season to 'pick teams'. Kinda like choosing teams in hoops, but instead of choosing the best for your team you pick the weaker squads.

I like this.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

I thought the opposite, although that assumption is based on D9, Graz, and TKW getting less attention than their parent teams.


There is no parent team for Graz. So if I somehow learn to DC I have no worries about making playoffs.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.