You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
MadCow420
offline
offline
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1981331
This guy has 8 career INTs and 68 strength? what am I doing wrong, should he have like a million INts?
This guy has 8 career INTs and 68 strength? what am I doing wrong, should he have like a million INts?
mmerc
offline
offline
Originally posted by O' HappyCow
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1981331
This guy has 8 career INTs and 68 strength? what am I doing wrong, should he have like a million INts?
Catching waaayy to low as well as jumping and vision. Also none of your VAs or SAs are geared to getting INTs.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1981331
This guy has 8 career INTs and 68 strength? what am I doing wrong, should he have like a million INts?
Catching waaayy to low as well as jumping and vision. Also none of your VAs or SAs are geared to getting INTs.
Originally posted by mmerc
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5067272&page=2
Read the truth.
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Told yall!
You're as far off on guessing my age as you are building DBs. I would never cry about anything typed here.
Fyi → lol = NOT crying. Lol
No one in here said that single digit strength is adequate for safeties. You need to learn to read.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5067272&page=2
Read the truth.
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Told yall!
You're as far off on guessing my age as you are building DBs. I would never cry about anything typed here.
Fyi → lol = NOT crying. Lol
No one in here said that single digit strength is adequate for safeties. You need to learn to read.
mmerc
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sellars
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by mmerc
Originally posted by Sellars
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
omg you dont understand GLb at all. Strength is not important for INT builds. therefore they wait till late in the build to train the strength to an acceptable level. But I have made several CBs with 8 strength and they played at the highest levels of GLB.
Originally posted by Sellars
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
omg you dont understand GLb at all. Strength is not important for INT builds. therefore they wait till late in the build to train the strength to an acceptable level. But I have made several CBs with 8 strength and they played at the highest levels of GLB.
Originally posted by mmerc
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
You obviously have some serious reading comprehension fails. Nobody said that strength is bad for DBs. They stated that it doesn't help with the INT score or with speed. You claimed that strength helps with INTs and speed. No one would claim that 6 single digit strength is fine for a DB. But good agents don't invest in strength on DBs (or any dot) to increase INTs or speed; they invest in strength to increase tackling ability, breaking blocks, forcing fumbles, etc.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
You obviously have some serious reading comprehension fails. Nobody said that strength is bad for DBs. They stated that it doesn't help with the INT score or with speed. You claimed that strength helps with INTs and speed. No one would claim that 6 single digit strength is fine for a DB. But good agents don't invest in strength on DBs (or any dot) to increase INTs or speed; they invest in strength to increase tackling ability, breaking blocks, forcing fumbles, etc.
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by mmerc
Originally posted by Sellars
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
No, clearly *you* have an issue with reading comprehension, as well as communicating your own thoughts, which is what people have had an issue with. Nobody said "low strength DBs are good". The issue everyone has had is that STR is something necessary to getting INTs, especially when you yourself post stuff like this:
Originally posted by mmerc
Strength affects speed, roll that.
Reread your post here again. Let it sink in. This has nothing to do with "fighting for the ball". It is saying STR is inter-related with speed. (If anything, the term Bort has used is "momentum", which is speed + agility working together. Note: STR does not play in there at all.)
As for the rare occasion where "fighting for the ball" comes in, sure, some strength will help, but not to an extent where you must focus on it. This is like reading the DT listing that says "Blocking skill will help you break blocks." Nobody in their right mind will waste any points (training or skill) putting a point of blocking on a DT for the purpose of breaking blocks.
Originally posted by Sellars
You still fail to show how STR influences INTs... And your also a moron cause no one in this entire thread said STR was a bad thing on a DB. We simply said it has no bearing on catching INTs which is exactly what u said. But I see u still wont comment about playing in shit leagues cause once again u know your wrong and u dont have a pair of balls to admit it so u dodge that portion of this thread, typicall for your type. FYI there is nothing in that thread u linked that showed anything we didnt already know.
you are telling me no one in this thread said strength was bad for DBs but someone here posted up a proud link to their lvl 79 DB with six or eight strength. There is more to INTs than the int roll, position on the feild and as BORT said sometimes u have to "fight" the WR for the ball.
No, clearly *you* have an issue with reading comprehension, as well as communicating your own thoughts, which is what people have had an issue with. Nobody said "low strength DBs are good". The issue everyone has had is that STR is something necessary to getting INTs, especially when you yourself post stuff like this:
Originally posted by mmerc
Strength affects speed, roll that.
Reread your post here again. Let it sink in. This has nothing to do with "fighting for the ball". It is saying STR is inter-related with speed. (If anything, the term Bort has used is "momentum", which is speed + agility working together. Note: STR does not play in there at all.)
As for the rare occasion where "fighting for the ball" comes in, sure, some strength will help, but not to an extent where you must focus on it. This is like reading the DT listing that says "Blocking skill will help you break blocks." Nobody in their right mind will waste any points (training or skill) putting a point of blocking on a DT for the purpose of breaking blocks.
mmerc
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
mmerc
offline
offline
Originally posted by vladykins
Reread your post here again. Let it sink in. This has nothing to do with "fighting for the ball". It is saying STR is inter-related with speed. (If anything, the term Bort has used is "momentum", which is speed + agility working together. Note: STR does not play in there at all.)
As for the rare occasion where "fighting for the ball" comes in, sure, some strength will help, but not to an extent where you must focus on it. This is like reading the DT listing that says "Blocking skill will help you break blocks." Nobody in their right mind will waste any points (training or skill) putting a point of blocking on a DT for the purpose of breaking blocks.
Do not try and ignore my detailed explanation of how strength helps get ints.
At first I did not feel it was worth explaining to u so I obviously (to me) gave a short fu answer.
Since then I broke it down for you fellas and provided true information taken from Bort.
You can try and hang on to my smart @ss answer pretending the real explanation isn't in front of your eyes.
Reread your post here again. Let it sink in. This has nothing to do with "fighting for the ball". It is saying STR is inter-related with speed. (If anything, the term Bort has used is "momentum", which is speed + agility working together. Note: STR does not play in there at all.)
As for the rare occasion where "fighting for the ball" comes in, sure, some strength will help, but not to an extent where you must focus on it. This is like reading the DT listing that says "Blocking skill will help you break blocks." Nobody in their right mind will waste any points (training or skill) putting a point of blocking on a DT for the purpose of breaking blocks.
Do not try and ignore my detailed explanation of how strength helps get ints.
At first I did not feel it was worth explaining to u so I obviously (to me) gave a short fu answer.
Since then I broke it down for you fellas and provided true information taken from Bort.
You can try and hang on to my smart @ss answer pretending the real explanation isn't in front of your eyes.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by mmerc
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Originally posted by mmerc
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
8 is enough for a level 64 CB...He hasnt addressed it yet, wtf is the big deal. If he is going to train strength, then he is going to wait until the end of the build to do it. That dot has 15 level more to go. Thats a shit ton of Sps. But again its an INT build so lolstrength
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Originally posted by mmerc
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4295798
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
8 is enough for a level 64 CB...He hasnt addressed it yet, wtf is the big deal. If he is going to train strength, then he is going to wait until the end of the build to do it. That dot has 15 level more to go. Thats a shit ton of Sps. But again its an INT build so lolstrength
MadCow420
offline
offline
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1981951 Here is my old old INT CB, shame he wasnt around for INT builds to be relevent again. He had plenty of strength
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2146187 Oh look, a CB with 6 strength. oh noes
moral of the story is, lolstrength for CB unless they are KL builds,
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2146187 Oh look, a CB with 6 strength. oh noes
moral of the story is, lolstrength for CB unless they are KL builds,
Originally posted by mmerc
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Where did I say 8 strength is enough?
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Where did I say 8 strength is enough?
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Originally posted by mmerc
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Where did I say 8 strength is enough?
apparently just by linking a dot that currently has 8 strength.
Originally posted by mmerc
This is the guy whom thinks 8 is enough strength.
Where did I say 8 strength is enough?
apparently just by linking a dot that currently has 8 strength.
Sellars
offline
offline
Apparently mmerc doesnt know that some people actually train zero ALG attribs last... LHF's dot is lvl 64 not lvl 79. Perhaps u should take a class on reading even before u take one on GLB mechanics. Oh and Vlady.... his DETAILED explenation was "STR over 50 helps get INT's". Srs detail right there
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
