Warrior General Games

Rk__Team_________________W___L___T____%_____PF____PA__
..1 . . Amsterdam Spartans. . . . . . 39 . . 25 . . 0 . . 61% . . 1,511 . . ...867
..2 . . Dublin Saints . . . . . . . . . . . 35 . . 29 . . 0 . . 55% . . 1,690 . . 1,700
..3 . . Stockholm Slackers . . . . . . . 35 . . 29 . . 0 . . 55% . . 1,254 . . 1,187
..4 . . Boston Punks. . . . . . . . . . . .34 . . 30 . . 0 . . 53% . . 1,894 . . 1,168
..5 . . PGL Gamers . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 . . 30 . . 0 . . 53% . . 1,274 . . 1,732
..6 . . Wolverhampton Wolves. . . . .34 . . 30 . . 0 . . 53% . . 1,265 . . 1,665
..7 . . Bonn Dynamo. . . . . . . . . . . 33 . . 31 . . 0 . . 52% . . 1,419 . . 1,143
..8 . . Atom Bombs . . . . . . . . . . . .32 . . 32 . . 0 . . 50% . . 1,671 . . 1,198
..9 . . Toulose Aviators . . . . . . . . .32 . . 32 . . 0 . . 50% . . 1,072 . . 1,865
10 . . West Country Wyverns. . . . . .31 . . 33 . . 0 . . 48% . . 1,697 . . 1,207
11 . . Steel City War Machine . . . . . 31 . . 33 . . 0 . . 48% . . 1,651 . . 1,798
12 . . Coventry Owls. . . . . . . . . . . 30 . . 34 . . 0 . . 47% . . 1,676 . . 1,244
13 . . Manchester Mob . . . . . . . . . .30 . . 34 . . 0 . . 47% . . 1,331 . . 1,230
14 . . Armagh Rally . . . . . . . . . . . .29 . . 35 . . 0 . . 45% . . 1,600 . . 1,813
15 . . Whitchurch Mouseketeers . . . 28 . . 36 . . 0 . . 44% . . 1,520 . . 1,921
16 . . Eurotrash Rabid Bats . . . . . . 25 . . 39 . . 0 . . 39% . . 1,155 . . 1,942



Rk__Team_________________W___L___T____%_____PF____PA__
..1 . . London Hitmen. . . . . . . . . .41 . . 23 . . 0 . . 64% . . 1,706 . . ...837
..2 . . Aarhus Stingers. . . . . . . . . .41 . . 23 . . 0 . . 64% . . 1,685 . . ...887
..3 . . Birmingham Cardinals. . . . . 39 . . 25 . . 0 . . 61% . . 1,666 . . ...899
..4 . . Dublin Dragoons. . . . . . . . .39 . . 25 . . 0 . . 61% . . 1,666 . . ...899
..5 . . Live Oak Eagles. . . . . . . . . .38 . . 26 . . 0 . . 59% . . 1,684 . . 1,356
..6 . . Berlin Ballers. . . . . . . . . . . .35 . . 29 . . 0 . . 55% . . 1,613 . . 1,017
..7 . . Mobile Alabama Leprechaun .34 . . 30 . . 0 . . 53% . . 1,399 . . 1,145
..8 . . Barcelona Bandits. . . . . . . . 33 . . 31 . . 0 . . 52% . . 1,372 . . 1,477
..9 . . Nuremburg Nightknights. . . .32 . . 32 . . 0 . . 50% . . 1,405 . . 1,103
10 . . Frankfurt Universe . . . . . . . .31 . . 33 . . 0 . . 48% . . 1,358 . . 1,539
11 . . Stockholm Syndrome . . . . . .31 . . 33 . . 0 . . 48% . . 1,209 . . 1,223
12 . . Bordeaux Carlin . . . . . . . . . .30 . . 34 . . 0 . . 47% . . 1,385 . . 1,515
13 . . Cedar Creek Wildcats . . . . . . 25 . . 39 . . 0 . . 39% . . ...992 . . 1,343
14 . . Inverness Highlanders. . . . . .23 . . 41 . . 0 . . 36% . . ...738 . . 1,959
15 . . Bushy Park Badgers . . . . . . . 21 . . 43 . . 0 . . 33% . . ...844 . . 1,867
16 . . Paris Colonels. . . . . . . . . . . .19 . . 45 . . 0 . . 30% . . ...702 . . 2,358

You can explain what's the W-L-T-%-PF-PA?

Sure, the (W)ins-(L)osses-(T)ies is the combined record of your remaining opponents and the % is the resulting winning percentage.

PF is points for
PA is points against

PF represents total points scored by your remaining opponents
PA represents total points allowed by your remaining opponents

Thank you for that service. Looks like the elite teams all have an easy remaining schedule.

The elite teams in Alpha, maybe.

Thank God for that...need some kind of reward for the bitch of a 1st half we've had.

Great thread. Thank you for working it all out.

Originally posted by Wrath Of Conor
Sure, the (W)ins-(L)osses-(T)ies is the combined record of your remaining opponents and the % is the resulting winning percentage.

PF is points for
PA is points against

PF represents total points scored by your remaining opponents
PA represents total points allowed by your remaining opponents

Thank you very usefull

eurotrash had a nasty first half of the season

9-0 ? yes really nasty LOL

Originally posted by Cedo
9-0 ? yes really nasty LOL

They really did have a tough first half schedule and the fact that they went through the ringer and came out 9-0 is a great achievement. No offense to the other teams, but Toulouse is their one and only remaining challenge. At this point I have to concede top seed to them since they own the tie breaker over us and hope Euro wins out.

The way I see it there are 7 elite teams in Alpha and Euro is one them obviously so that means they had 6 top tier games and 5 of them all came in their first half of the sched and they won all of them. Also, since there are 7 elite teams in my mind the #1 seed is that much more valuable and we wish we had another shot at Euro, but we don't.

I was just kidding They did great indeed and i must face them in my conference match i'm soooooo pleased...

I think this last game must be fixed, that's not really fair to everyone to count on luck to have a good schedule or not. Bordeaux Carlin is quite unlucky, twice in a row we face a playoff team (or better...)

I have proposed somme suggestions to remove this unfairness and i'm not the only one (17 teams league with no interconf, interconf but with same standing #1 face #1 etc...) There's some good ideas and some idiot who think it's better like that with a total unfair schedule.

I am in agreement that your last game of the season should be the interconference game but be against the same ranking as you from the previous season or since the teams earned their rankings it could be reverse order from the previous season. Another words the #1 team in Alpha plays against the #16 seed in Zeta, etc.

A game #1 vs #16 is not very interesting...not unfair etc... I like too the interconf match but we need more interesting matches same ranking. The other reason is the logic of interleague. The purpose of this match is to know wich conf is the best and for this you can't compare #1 vs #16... what make sense is seed against seed to see who's the best #1 #2 #3 etc...

Yeah you are right as one game shouldn't really make that much of a difference except if you need that game to make the playoffs and you have to play the toughest team in the other division. Honestly I think it is just best to randomly select that game because I could see so many downfalls for best against worst along with the best against best.