Its a suggestion and it's related to the boosting changes. So I'd like to post here.
----------
Suggestion:
For those players who are under 40d old and haven't boost 6 times, either they didn't pre-boost or they were created after Day -8, they should get the extra boosting chance to fill 6 boosts at off-season. But their levels and XPs cannot exceed the expected experience compare to pre-boosted dots.
----------
Take my dots for example. My boosting rookies didn't boost upon creation, and they'll be Lv 14 at the end of this season. Under the new boosting changes they cannot exceed Lv 76. It'll force me to retire all of them. It wont cost me anything because I can take all my FPs back. But what if I want to pay more money to keep some of them?
That's to say, I'm willing to execute 3 extra boosts (if available) at off-season. I'm willing to boost them 3 times from Lv 14 to Lv 15 & 800 XP (the expected experience compare to pre-boosted dots). In return, I'll get 8 SP (6+1+1) per dot and a chance to reach Lv 79 at the end of their careers. It's fair to other pre-boosted players. We pay the same FPs and reach the same level. And it'll be an incentive for me to consume more FPs this season, instead of participate a fun season for free.
The suggestion is not only for me, but also for those who don't (or can't) boost their players upon creation but want to keep their dots. I don't think it's a bad idea for agents who feel happy about their well-built dots, who want to keep going with the teams they participate, and are willing to invest more money into it after a successful rookie season.
And I think the extra boosts for players under 40d old should be available every off-season. Let's image a newbie agent in the future create a player at Day -8. He join a competitive and active team. He learn a lot from other agent and want to stick with this team. But the owner has to find another player to replace him just because he cannot reach Lv 79. It will cut the tie between veteran agents and the newbie. This newbie agent can retire his player and make another one for free (under new changes), but will him find another active team and feel fun and comfortable with this game? Lots of agents get incentives to boost their players because they love their players and their teams, and want all of these to be success. They are motivated by their peers to boost their players. They are pulled by the community. They don't need to be pushed to purchase the FP. It's the best situation for the game managers, and the admins should be happy give them a chance to spend money for their goal.
It will be a win-win situation. Please consider this suggestion.
----------
Suggestion:
For those players who are under 40d old and haven't boost 6 times, either they didn't pre-boost or they were created after Day -8, they should get the extra boosting chance to fill 6 boosts at off-season. But their levels and XPs cannot exceed the expected experience compare to pre-boosted dots.
----------
Take my dots for example. My boosting rookies didn't boost upon creation, and they'll be Lv 14 at the end of this season. Under the new boosting changes they cannot exceed Lv 76. It'll force me to retire all of them. It wont cost me anything because I can take all my FPs back. But what if I want to pay more money to keep some of them?
That's to say, I'm willing to execute 3 extra boosts (if available) at off-season. I'm willing to boost them 3 times from Lv 14 to Lv 15 & 800 XP (the expected experience compare to pre-boosted dots). In return, I'll get 8 SP (6+1+1) per dot and a chance to reach Lv 79 at the end of their careers. It's fair to other pre-boosted players. We pay the same FPs and reach the same level. And it'll be an incentive for me to consume more FPs this season, instead of participate a fun season for free.
The suggestion is not only for me, but also for those who don't (or can't) boost their players upon creation but want to keep their dots. I don't think it's a bad idea for agents who feel happy about their well-built dots, who want to keep going with the teams they participate, and are willing to invest more money into it after a successful rookie season.
And I think the extra boosts for players under 40d old should be available every off-season. Let's image a newbie agent in the future create a player at Day -8. He join a competitive and active team. He learn a lot from other agent and want to stick with this team. But the owner has to find another player to replace him just because he cannot reach Lv 79. It will cut the tie between veteran agents and the newbie. This newbie agent can retire his player and make another one for free (under new changes), but will him find another active team and feel fun and comfortable with this game? Lots of agents get incentives to boost their players because they love their players and their teams, and want all of these to be success. They are motivated by their peers to boost their players. They are pulled by the community. They don't need to be pushed to purchase the FP. It's the best situation for the game managers, and the admins should be happy give them a chance to spend money for their goal.
It will be a win-win situation. Please consider this suggestion.
Edited by Theodor on Aug 11, 2011 22:04:50
Edited by Theodor on Aug 11, 2011 22:03:57
Edited by Theodor on Aug 11, 2011 22:01:00
Edited by Theodor on Aug 11, 2011 21:59:37