Warrior General Games

Team Power Rank
Dallas Browns 1
Edinburgh Black Knights 2
West Yorkshire Wolverines 3
Brussels Raiders 4
Irish Car Bombs 5
Newcastle Raiders 6
Sundsvall Flames 7
Glasgow Tigers 8
Schiffertown Griffin's 9
Southampton Stags 10
Tilburg Power 11
Oakton Huskies 12
Chaos Engine 13
Stockholm Penguins 14
Danzig Daemons 15
South Beach Sharks 16
Amsterdam Flying Dutchmen 17
Mokum Lions 18
Trillville Hoods 19
Milan Cock Fighters 20
Rome Pride 21
Dublin Fightin' Leprechauns 22
Icelandic Vikings 23
Middlesbrough Mayhem 24
Donegal Wailers 25
Bonn Jovi 26
Cologne Cougars 27
Dusseldorf Buzzards 28
Portugal Bull Riders 29
Plainview Bulldogs 30
Belfast Shamrocks 31
Jamaica Rumrunners 32

Using season stats I came up with a power rankings calculation, the above is the result.

Wow, I do dislike this forums lack of formatting

THESE RANKINGS MEAN JACK SHIT TO ME... we beat the flames like they were a pop warner team and they are ranked higher.. the team thats ranked fourth has no reason to be there.. and the other Raiders at 6th i wouldnt waste my second string on.. they are 3-3 barely holding top ten in their on conf. what makes you think they deserve to be at 6? give us more credit.. you guys listened to the smack talk between us and the Knights and took it way to seriously.. we are not hype.. and how is a team thats 6-0 ranked 10th in the power rankings and beat teams that are ranked higher than them??? this is bogus.. i think you ignorance is getting to me.. good day

haha, oh wow. You just lost all rights to post a power ranking. I would LOVE for you to tell me how you came up with these rankings. You know I will just wait for MudBugs to post one. This is SOO bad I actually think the knights would even agree with the GRIFFS on this one..

Wait you know what you did atleast get the top two right...lol

I took pass, receiving and rush yards, I took pass and rush yards allowed per game, and finally I took points allowed per game and ranked each team per stat. and calc the summary rank for each team

If you have a problem with the stats then you're missing the point, stats don't lie. It shows what you're team is capable of with the competition it has faced...

I am not even going to sweat it. Power rankings mean nothing, rank us last for all we care. We know were a top team and as far as I am concerned we have played like it, and will continue to.


Good luck on the season.

no problem, I didn't mean it as a slight to anyone just using the stats as a tool to see what the statistical rankings would be

Southmapton Stags 10th hmmmm! I guess it isnt taking into account the fact that we played most of the best teams in our league already

Gj though man

I agree, the OTHER Raiders do not belong there. Not this season at least.

33 teams??

Clearly the Southmapton Stags have ugly cheerleaders thus ranking them behind the Irish Car Bombs and our smokin pink dots/cheerleaders

Originally posted by Mobius
I took pass, receiving and rush yards, I took pass and rush yards allowed per game, and finally I took points allowed per game and ranked each team per stat. and calc the summary rank for each team

If you have a problem with the stats then you're missing the point, stats don't lie. It shows what you're team is capable of with the competition it has faced...

I understand what he is trying to do, but he needs to look at the strength os schedule as well. Thats how you tell the rankings. You can hve huge stats if you only play weaker teams.

Agreed that the Griffs should be higher. Their only loss came to Edinburgh - #2 overall - and they beat the #7 team rather easily.

If stats continue to be the measuring stick, then things may even out as the strength of schedule evens out. But with some teams focused on getting their starters max playing time, while others are trying to make sure and get their backups in, the stats can lie. You have to look at each game in it's context.

But all in all this is a nice effort with the power rankings. Thanks for the work, Mobius. It's appreciated, even as it's busily disected.

Yeah us Griffs do appreciate the attempt, we just don't agree

Wow ...

I am going to take it that the STAGS dont agree either, lol.