Originally posted by TheGreatAus
You did read it right.
Can I ask the admins where the logic in that is? Did the recent changes to VA's have data to arrive at the suggested values for the VA's in question?
The logic is that Bort says the SA's are working fine and he does not want to reveal the inner workings of the game as it would remove a big strategic element of the game.
As for the VA's, we primarily made changes to VA's based upon their usage, those that had very few people using them were given buffs in order to make them a more attractive option for users... and yes, the changes/values were tested. Anytime we make a change, it's tested. For things like that, it's tested by myself and/or Bort, not the testers.
You did read it right.
Can I ask the admins where the logic in that is? Did the recent changes to VA's have data to arrive at the suggested values for the VA's in question?
The logic is that Bort says the SA's are working fine and he does not want to reveal the inner workings of the game as it would remove a big strategic element of the game.
As for the VA's, we primarily made changes to VA's based upon their usage, those that had very few people using them were given buffs in order to make them a more attractive option for users... and yes, the changes/values were tested. Anytime we make a change, it's tested. For things like that, it's tested by myself and/or Bort, not the testers.