Warrior General Games

1. (3.43)Munich Maniax
2. (3.38)Polk High Panthers
3. (2.43)Black Country Knights
3. (2.43)Bergen Op Zoom Sneaky Buffalo
3. (2.43)Porto Wolves
6. (2.38)Helsinki Crabs
7. (1.86)Roskilde Kings
8. (1.81)Normandy Invasion
9. (1.29)Mannheim Jaguars
9. (1.29)Chernobyl Neutrons
9. (1.29)Italian Stallions
9. (1.29)Hattgenstein Volunteers
13. (.43)Dublin Anarchists
14. (.38)Rome Poison
15. (.14)Sicily Mobsters
16. (-.05)London Pounds
16. (-.05)Dublin Shamrocks
18. (-.43)Portuguese Men-of-War
18. (-.43)Valencia Kings
18. (-.43)Cologne Pirates
21. (-.57)Stuttgart Blazers
22. (-.86)Global Gym Purple Corba's
23. (-1)Siena IL PALIO
23. (-1)Antwerp Sofa Kings
25. (-1.19)Davenport Tigers
26. (-1.57)EASTWICK SAVAGES
26. (-1.57)Tilburg Lightning
26. (-1.57)The Shady McKrackers
29. (-2.43)Jellystone Park Bruins
30. (-2.57)Hessel Voltage
31. (-2.71)London Aces
32. (-3.86)Sinsheim MC Airs

BTW as I forgot to say this for the first pass, this system was 'borrowed' from Shutdown in the Oceania AAA#1.

Also the wins/losses numbers proved harder then expected for me to build with my current method. Working on a better more flexible way.

well you have us tied with Black Country at #3 and they beat us so they probably should own that spot.

nah, that would really defeat what this ranking is about. Besides it was a pretty close game at the end. Those two fumbles were insane.

we had the same type game again today vs. Roskilde. The computer seemed to keep making them throw a pick to us in the 4th quarter. Much like our game, it almost seemed as if the sim was going to force the home team to win.

There are no tie breakers in this kind of a ranking. This ranking is all about the strength of the teams you beat, and the strength of the teams that beat you.

By Edit:
Also I have no clue how Google Docs ordered the tied scores, and I just left it in that order.