would you like it better if world league was broken up into divisions inside of the conferences? Just to create some more rivalries and more interesting playoff scenarios? Any other reasons you can think of?
Forum > Pro Leagues > Would you like it better if World League was broken up into divisions inside of the conferences?
PatricktheDookie
offline
offline
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Edited by PatricktheDookie on Jan 29, 2011 20:08:29
ChicagoTRS
offline
offline
Originally posted by PatricktheDookie
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by PatricktheDookie
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Well, we could just go the other direction then and have ONE giant 32-team league with no conferences and no divisions. The top 16 make the playoffs--#1 plays #16 and so on in round one of the playoffs. Meanwhile teams 17-32 demote.
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Well, we could just go the other direction then and have ONE giant 32-team league with no conferences and no divisions. The top 16 make the playoffs--#1 plays #16 and so on in round one of the playoffs. Meanwhile teams 17-32 demote.
datongw
offline
offline
Nah, I like the fact that we play 16 different teams rather than facing some teams twice in the regular season.
Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Originally posted by PatricktheDookie
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Well, we could just go the other direction then and have ONE giant 32-team league with no conferences and no divisions. The top 16 make the playoffs--#1 plays #16 and so on in round one of the playoffs. Meanwhile teams 17-32 demote.
But then who do you play?
Originally posted by PatricktheDookie
We have enough issues with the balancing of two conferences.
Imagine the whining if they tried to break it down even further.
Well, we could just go the other direction then and have ONE giant 32-team league with no conferences and no divisions. The top 16 make the playoffs--#1 plays #16 and so on in round one of the playoffs. Meanwhile teams 17-32 demote.
But then who do you play?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
