Warrior General Games

Originally posted by madmal
Originally posted by LionsLover

I'm going on a limb and am probably going to sound like an ass, but a -1 here. You will limit people to only coaching teams with rosters they like and will do well with. I know several people who coach teams of friends teams' who are in total shambles, with nothing to help them out. 0-16 or 2-14 will not add to their coaching %age, even if it's just to try and help someone out. Or someone who OC/DCs a team, and they don't comply with his tactics, and end up losing games. Back in season 4 or 5 I took the team with the longest losing streak in GLB (60+) and helped them turn things around, but it took a whole season to convince the owner his players sucked, they were way underleveled and he needed to start over. I know not many people help out the needy, but to those that do it will make them seem like a worse coach than they are.

this

unfortunately I have to agree with the above...

I mean, there is potential ways to still allow people to help people out like this (such as allowing them to click a checkbox to not have it count), but I think all that would really do is make people only accept stats from the teams that are super serious, and/or have an advantage over the other teams etc

in a perfect world, it would be great, but GLB isn't perfect...

+1

+1 to OP.

Originally posted by Chysil
Originally posted by madmal

Originally posted by LionsLover


I'm going on a limb and am probably going to sound like an ass, but a -1 here. You will limit people to only coaching teams with rosters they like and will do well with. I know several people who coach teams of friends teams' who are in total shambles, with nothing to help them out. 0-16 or 2-14 will not add to their coaching %age, even if it's just to try and help someone out. Or someone who OC/DCs a team, and they don't comply with his tactics, and end up losing games. Back in season 4 or 5 I took the team with the longest losing streak in GLB (60+) and helped them turn things around, but it took a whole season to convince the owner his players sucked, they were way underleveled and he needed to start over. I know not many people help out the needy, but to those that do it will make them seem like a worse coach than they are.

this

unfortunately I have to agree with the above...

I mean, there is potential ways to still allow people to help people out like this (such as allowing them to click a checkbox to not have it count), but I think all that would really do is make people only accept stats from the teams that are super serious, and/or have an advantage over the other teams etc

in a perfect world, it would be great, but GLB isn't perfect...

I don't see it. I doubt people will put so much emphasis on it to really care. At the end it is the jpg's that people count.

- It will be nice if you can have a separate record from WL, pro, Regional pro, minors by tier (elite, competative, regular) and pee-wee
- The are owners, co-owners and head coaches that are also OC & DC the teams. They should be in the mix too.

Originally posted by tragula
I don't see it. I doubt people will put so much emphasis on it to really care. At the end it is the jpg's that people count.

- It will be nice if you can have a separate record from WL, pro, Regional pro, minors by tier (elite, competative, regular) and pee-wee
- The are owners, co-owners and head coaches that are also OC & DC the teams. They should be in the mix too.

+1

Well lets keep this moving....would any other people like to add onto the idea?

Thread moved by moderator.

I like it, maybe add something in for recruiters as well.