I changed my mind. This would help out someone I know so +1 or something.
why the heck not? if someone has the title of co-owner , should be able to do everything the owner can except pay for the team with flex.
+1
+1
DTRAIN
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
I changed my mind. This would help out someone I know so +1 or something.
wow, now that the Dubster has approved, this should be a no brainer!
I changed my mind. This would help out someone I know so +1 or something.
wow, now that the Dubster has approved, this should be a no brainer!
Husker2
offline
offline
-1, unless you can get the co owner to start paying for flex for the team. the only way i would be ok with this is
Originally posted by Da18thLetter28
I think the owner should have the option to let a co-owner do as much as the owner can. It should all be up to the owner.
Originally posted by Da18thLetter28
I think the owner should have the option to let a co-owner do as much as the owner can. It should all be up to the owner.
DTRAIN
offline
offline
Originally posted by Husker2
^^^
add that to the OP and im all for this
uh..i think its stated in the OP
^^^
add that to the OP and im all for this
uh..i think its stated in the OP
Husker2
offline
offline
Originally posted by DTRAIN
uh..i think its stated in the OP
i might still be hung over
+1!!!
uh..i think its stated in the OP
i might still be hung over
+1!!!
i feel u bro. i just made it simple. this should be an easy thing to add. i think it would help owners glb wide.You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
