Warrior General Games

+1

+1

Should have records though...

+1 Great Idea

+1

Originally posted by -M-
Should have records though...

huh? ...this suggestion is all about records! ...all aspects from the team GM positions to league rankings and player rosters would be listed for each and every season! ...If you wanted to know results for each season, then I show clickable links on my example that would take you to each season page, where you can view the results of each game and view the W/L record from there! ...I dunno how it possible to expand any more on my suggestion, but if you have some ideas on how to make this better, then please feel free to post here to help refine this some more

...ok so I thought that I should add this, coz I assume that you mean that you want the W/L record to be shown on the team history page also! ...my suggestion is mainly about us being able to view the history easier than we are currently able to do, and with a list of links and the rankings being shown, it makes it much much easier for us to get a fair idea of the team quality and what the team consisted of, whereas atm it is difficult to attain ...I mean the W/L record is only one click away man! ...if the league rankings are not enough for you, then it not so difficult to click the listed season page link and add it up, but maybe it could be shown when you move your cursor over the season page link?!?

+1

terrific idea

I like the idea. I think adding historical elements really draws those who have been with the game a long time closer to the team. I also like the idea that you can attach something like this to players both in terms of what team they played on year by year and what league they were in/made it to.

I know there was another thread elsewhere talking about showing just those agents that made it to World League, and that is quite an accomplishment, but I like the idea of showing where players were coming from and (from a recruiting perspective) what agents have consistently made the best dots in terms of where they got their players to.

hmm ...well out of the 'recently added suggestions' that are up for voting, my suggestion is one which has the most votes for and is close to having the least votes against ...some of these suggestions have already been implemented, or are labelled as 'under consideration/in progress', which is the main reason why this suggestion won't be able to have the least votes against of all the 'recently added suggestions' ...I know that there has already been mention of some consideration towards implementing something that will show some records of historical value, and what I have shown is just an example of how I would like to have it shown ...but if there is already some consideration/discussion towards this by the powers that be, then shouldn't this suggesion already be labelled accordingly also? ...SHOULD BE LABELLED 'UNDER CONSIDERATION/IN PROGRESS' NAAOOO!!! kthxbye

Thread moved by moderator.