Originally posted by Mstr_October
I'd like to see that too, but we don't have it. My point is simply that blitzing is not an exploit. It can be countered. I would love to have all those things, but none of that has to do with taking away the DPC.
Sure they do. They could be considered alternatives to removing the DPC.
Originally posted by Mstr_October
If I was a DC and I was playing a team that passed to their TE every play and I thought to myself, self don't guard the TE at all, and the opposing team scores 350 points from passes to their TE, is that an exploit? Should stop allowing TEs to catch the ball or be a part of any play? No. Of course not.
No, but you can currently man him up with any LB, CB, or S you want or do a zone or whatever. OC's currently have one option and one option only to counter these blitzes.
I'd like to see that too, but we don't have it. My point is simply that blitzing is not an exploit. It can be countered. I would love to have all those things, but none of that has to do with taking away the DPC.
Sure they do. They could be considered alternatives to removing the DPC.
Originally posted by Mstr_October
If I was a DC and I was playing a team that passed to their TE every play and I thought to myself, self don't guard the TE at all, and the opposing team scores 350 points from passes to their TE, is that an exploit? Should stop allowing TEs to catch the ball or be a part of any play? No. Of course not.
No, but you can currently man him up with any LB, CB, or S you want or do a zone or whatever. OC's currently have one option and one option only to counter these blitzes.