Originally posted by Enkidu98
...lots of common sense...
Bort has always said he wants a fine balance between what an agent can control and what a OC can control, for whatever reason.
I would guess this falls into that area, it would be a lot better for the game/OCs if Open Reciever = Pass, regardless of depth, then the OC controls the play call and progression to define his intended yards gained, and a slider per OAI input for weighting between open man to depth of completion, with the QB tactic just effecting pass quality.
But I can see how an agent who wants to build a long passer would feel screwed over by an OC.
Maybe the above with an agents tactic of Always follow OCs open man/depth of route instruction....Y/N.
But thats pretty much a band aid, and I hate them. And its bound to lead to more in fighting between owners and agents, so not a good idea.
I actually think that if coverage + distance values are reviewed and adjusted, then QBs would make sensible decisions a lot more often and this discussion would be moot. And thats probably easier to do as well.
...lots of common sense...
Bort has always said he wants a fine balance between what an agent can control and what a OC can control, for whatever reason.
I would guess this falls into that area, it would be a lot better for the game/OCs if Open Reciever = Pass, regardless of depth, then the OC controls the play call and progression to define his intended yards gained, and a slider per OAI input for weighting between open man to depth of completion, with the QB tactic just effecting pass quality.
But I can see how an agent who wants to build a long passer would feel screwed over by an OC.
Maybe the above with an agents tactic of Always follow OCs open man/depth of route instruction....Y/N.
But thats pretty much a band aid, and I hate them. And its bound to lead to more in fighting between owners and agents, so not a good idea.
I actually think that if coverage + distance values are reviewed and adjusted, then QBs would make sensible decisions a lot more often and this discussion would be moot. And thats probably easier to do as well.