Warrior General Games

I use a GM script on the playbook that shows what packages a play is in and what input those packages are in. I've been having some goal line plays called and my depth chart is not set up well to use goal line plays (not enough dots on the FB and TE slots). So I go and look for which packages those plays are in, but can't because goal line plays are not in my playbook. And my playbook has all the plays in it.

Ok, any scripts that you are using are not something that GLB created or is responsible for. However, if you have issues with plays be called that aren;t in your playbook etc, please post the replay links, tester results, and then grant me access to your offense for testing.

Needs more info for now.

Goal Line Plays are not in my Play Book. Are they in yours? If they aren't, maybe, just maybe that would be a bug.

Oh, I see it now. I thought you were talking about having removed them, but they were still getting called.

No, I checked my playbooks and Goalline plays are not available to add or remove whatsoever. I do think they should be, so likely a bug

I don't have any access to AI's to check this myself, but my assumption is VB knows what he's talking about here. Sending this to QA for further review.

did this happen in multiple games?

It's not a game or sim thing. It's simply the fact that Goalline plays do not exist in the playbook for removal or addition. Maybe intended idk......

Sorry to bud in, but I couldn't resist clarifying this.

Goalline plays (all three of them) are always in the playbook. You can't remove them (and they don't show up when manipulating your playbook).
When you create packages or select plays for your OAI, you always have all three Goalline plays available.

My money is on "working as intended".

I suspect that's correct - you aren't allowed to manipulate the goal line plays in the playbook so they don't show up when editing your playbook. I'm open to opinions on this one, and perhaps we just need to ask Catch.

personally, i think this one should be marked as "working as intended."

I'm not one to speculate on how GLB is coded, but it seems pretty silly to me that bort would accidently leave out a whole formation. You would need to purposely leave it out.

I'm going to give this not a bug, but if you wanted to ask catch about it, then you could disagree with me and pass it along

i'm moving this along. if somebody thought it was a bug by now, they would have interjected within the past 3 weeks that it sat here.

Working as intended.