GG PAIN NATION MIDGETS
PING72
offline
offline
GG Dirty, other than the death spiral at the end (the 21 points in about 2 minutes, lol), it was about what I expected.
Exxdee
offline
offline
GG FG. It's hard to beat a team that's good and that has a 3 level advantage. Good luck during the rest of the playoffs.
jkid2
offline
offline
Originally posted by Exxdee
GG FG. It's hard to beat a team that's good and that has a 3 level advantage. Good luck during the rest of the playoffs.
GG guys, your defense was excellent for 3 levels down.
GG FG. It's hard to beat a team that's good and that has a 3 level advantage. Good luck during the rest of the playoffs.
GG guys, your defense was excellent for 3 levels down.
Gerr
offline
offline
My 1st round departure wasn't totally unexpected, so GG SAS. My team was built for pure rushing, but changed it to a 50/50 split around mid-season, and thus my builds were just not that good, so I think my Bears team did better than expected this season considering. Hell, all my QB's were rushing QB's and all my WR's were blocking TE's, how good of a passing game could I come up with, especially when the early passing bonuses were wearing off? Boosting and CEQ helped, but not enough to compete with a well built team like SAS.
Edited by Gerr on Aug 31, 2010 15:23:31
1kwerdna
offline
offline
What on earth was the point with using TE's at WR?
The only argument you could really make was that you wanted the strength/blocking ALG's of a TE, I suppose, but if you just chose the "power reciever" or "ST" archetype you could have gotten either STR or Blocking as your primary without having to have an out of position penalty.
I guess it also saves a little bit of flex, but if you're out of flex I'd much rather have cut down on something else.
The only argument you could really make was that you wanted the strength/blocking ALG's of a TE, I suppose, but if you just chose the "power reciever" or "ST" archetype you could have gotten either STR or Blocking as your primary without having to have an out of position penalty.
I guess it also saves a little bit of flex, but if you're out of flex I'd much rather have cut down on something else.
Gerr
offline
offline
I was building a team that would either never pass, or would only pass to a RB out of the backfield. I thought a blocking TE at the WR spot would be a better option than a blocking WR, plus they were cheaper. I was looking for better blocking on sweeps and pitches, so it made logical sense. My mistake was building a team that never passes as a pure rushing team just doesn't work, so when I switched to more of a balanced team, my personnel wasn't good for passing. Hence the reason I was surprised I went 12-4 on the season, so a 1st round exit doesn't surprise me this season.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.