Warrior General Games

Working on taking Vision to either 68 or 73 while training Strength, Stamina, Tackling and Confidence and will start including catching in there soon, curious as to thoughts on which one you would take Vision to and why? Thanks for any comments about that or anything else

Attributes
Physical Attributes
Strength: 31.3 (3)
Speed: 106.92 (23)
Agility: 74.15 (2)
Jumping: 41.15
Stamina: 30.61
Vision: 61.92
Confidence: 23.84

Football Skills
Blocking: 13.53
Tackling: 23.61
Throwing: 8
Catching: 15.84
Carrying: 13.53
Kicking: 8
Punting: 8

Special Abilities
Coverage Abilities
Change Direction: 3
Superior Vision: 8
Swat Ball: 1
Sticky Hands: 1
Closing Speed: 1

Hard Hitter Abilities
Wrap Up Tackle: 0
Diving Tackle: 0
Growl: 0
Big Hit: 0
Monster Hit: 0

VAs
Ball Hawk 10
Red Zone Freak 3

AEQ
Avoid Fake 9%

I'd say take Vision no higher than 68.

After that take Strength up to at least 56. Then Tackling up to at least 50.

Putting 8 SP's into Superior Vision this early was pretty retarded. If you don't know that now, then now you do. Next time don't put more than 1 point (or any) into any SA until your attributes are close to where you want them. If you're boosting, that's probably around level 45.

After getting vision up to 68, focus solely on Strength and Tackling till those get up at least 50. Those need to get higher if you want to compete at the higher levels. You'll get bowled over if you don't.

Curious choice with Red Zone Freak and Ball Hawk, as well. The former because I find that to be a weak VA. The latter because you are so low in jumping, catching, and carrying to really do much when you do get to the ball.

I hate people who hide behind a name on the Internet and call people retarded.....guess you have never heard of AEQ and CE to get SA up and your comments about strength, tackling and jumping are from someone who has no idea what they are talking about...Now listen real good now, I have been slow building. I took speed to the level I wanted it. I then took agility to the level I wanted it, now I'm taking vision to the level I want it, then I'll work on the others so acting all high and mighty like you are telling a school child how they messed up today's assignment doesn't cut any great thing with me, I know where I'm going with the guy's build, asked a simple question about how high you would take vision and why, your first line was fine except for you had no reason for only taking it to 68, not surprising but you didn't give me any reason to think you have a clue what you are talking about there and the rest of your post is made from the high and mighty wanna be, sorry didn't ask for that....funny thing is I know some of the guys who have been building top players on here for a long time, I know how to build a player....we were having a discussion on the merits of where to take vision on a SS that plays a lot of man and thought I would ask a simple question on here to get some more advice from some other people because there are some very intelligent guys on here, my problem is I got a response from one who doesn't fit that category and tried to impress me along with putting me down, sorry buddy but you just made a fool of yourself but you did give about 15 of us a very good laugh....LMAO

Here is the thing, he didn't call you retarded, he called the decision that you pump SA's that fast retarded.
And if you don't want comments regarding your build then DONT POST.

Originally posted by tenorx
Here is the thing, he didn't call you retarded, he called the decision that you pump SA's that fast retarded.
And if you don't want comments regarding your build then DONT POST.

This I wasn't calling you (the OP) retarded. I was merely stating that the decision to pump up a stat that high that early is retarded. Also, it might cause for less confusion next time if you post his entire build and equipment. Which you did not.

But I will change my statement now. After your reply, I will go so far as to call you internet retarded. There. I said it. Do something about it. Like watching the special olympics, I got a good laugh out of reading your reply.

Retards!!