I would prefer not having coaches because it is another thing to recruit and/or another player I will have to spend flex on if I want my team to compete and can't find a coach.
That being said, we do get free flex and it will only coast 100 flex a season to fully upgrade a coach--we usually get more than that in free flex.
I think the best question I have seen so far is why not have some relationship in terms of the coach benefit and the attributes of the player? Let's say that Brett Favre retires and Michael Vick does too. Would they be equally good coaches that first year? Would Vick be a better Coach for an offense that had a running QB? Would Favre be a better QB for an offense that ran a West Coast offense?
That being said, we do get free flex and it will only coast 100 flex a season to fully upgrade a coach--we usually get more than that in free flex.
I think the best question I have seen so far is why not have some relationship in terms of the coach benefit and the attributes of the player? Let's say that Brett Favre retires and Michael Vick does too. Would they be equally good coaches that first year? Would Vick be a better Coach for an offense that had a running QB? Would Favre be a better QB for an offense that ran a West Coast offense?