User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Champion League > Do all WL Zeta DL suck?
Page:
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Looking through WL Zeta, the most sacks by any DE is 4, and the most by a DT is 1 after 7 games. It looks like the 32 starting DTs in Zeta have only combined for 2 total sacks in 56 total games played.

No team in WL Zeta has more than 9 defensive line sacks through the first 7 games. So even the best DL in the conference can't seem to muster 1.5 sacks per game.

So
Are the OL all really that good?
Are the DL all really that bad?
or
Is the balance off?
 
Meatdawg
offline
Link
 
Both my guards are in Zeta, coincidence? I think not
 
Link
 
My backup DT has 3 tackles and 1 PD in 7 games. My conclusion is that you are talking out of your backside here.
 
blln4lyf
offline
Link
 
Love the presentation. Might get a response or 2. 1.29 Sacks by the D-line/game leads Zeta by my team. Pretty low if you ask me.
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
inb430+pageswithnoresponsefrombort
 
Wylker
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
Looking through WL Zeta, the most sacks by any DE is 4, and the most by a DT is 1 after 7 games. It looks like the 32 starting DTs in Zeta have only combined for 2 total sacks in 56 total games played.

No team in WL Zeta has more than 9 defensive line sacks through the first 7 games. So even the best DL in the conference can't seem to muster 1.5 sacks per game.

So
Are the OL all really that good?
Are the DL all really that bad?
or
Is the balance off?


There is no chance that there is broken code. The sim is perfect.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Wylker
Originally posted by Rage Kinard

Looking through WL Zeta, the most sacks by any DE is 4, and the most by a DT is 1 after 7 games. It looks like the 32 starting DTs in Zeta have only combined for 2 total sacks in 56 total games played.

No team in WL Zeta has more than 9 defensive line sacks through the first 7 games. So even the best DL in the conference can't seem to muster 1.5 sacks per game.

So
Are the OL all really that good?
Are the DL all really that bad?
or
Is the balance off?


There is no chance that there is broken code. The sim is perfect.


 
jktooley
offline
Link
 
zeta is better top to bottom than alpha by a lot?
 
GP1
offline
Link
 
Thought this thread was about DSLs
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by GP1
Thought this thread was about DSLs

That makes approximately 0.00 sense

although a DSL thread would be p nice

you should make one in FFA
 
GP1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by AMP
Originally posted by GP1

Thought this thread was about DSLs

That makes approximately 0.00 sense

although a DSL thread would be p nice

you should make one in FFA


You shut your mouth and see yourself out, scrub!
 
GMathiasf
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard

Is the balance off?


Rage you've been harping on this for so long and provided plenty of evidence. Non more damning in my mind than the fact that they're testing "typical Cs" that are like level 50 and "typical DTs" that are like level 80. Not sure what to tell you other than you're right...again.
 
head1
offline
Link
 
Gideon should have more than 4 honestly, its his DC fault he doesnt.
 
Chaos Knight
offline
Link
 
Higher level you get, the worse DTs/DEs play. Most of the time, you never even notice them on the field, aside from getting owned by a single OLinemen 90% of the time.
 
PackMan97
offline
Link
 
All of the DT and NTs are in therapy for getting the royal beat down. I don't know what's up with all the pansy DE's.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=659435
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=93535
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.