Warrior General Games

Interesting, I thought you guys were better then that, but according to Matty P, you are not
MattyP
online
Aug 6, 2009 14:25:02
LinkQuote

Originally posted by youngJP90
Originally posted by MattyP

who do you replace them with?

Ehh look for a team worth going for in APL.

Did you know that 4 teams gutted in APL at season's end? So the 8th best APL team?

I can almost guarantee that the replacement team would go 0-16.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3103895

Originally posted by SheVegas
Interesting, I thought you guys were better then that, but according to Matty P, you are not
MattyP
online
Aug 6, 2009 14:25:02
LinkQuote

Originally posted by youngJP90
Originally posted by MattyP

who do you replace them with?

Ehh look for a team worth going for in APL.

Did you know that 4 teams gutted in APL at season's end? So the 8th best APL team?

I can almost guarantee that the replacement team would go 0-16.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3103895

For you non-crazies out there, MattyP was referring to the "next in line" team which was a CPU team.

As referenced by this post here: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3103895&page=2#26768509

Even though you are trying to create tension where there is none (good try btw)

Whoever was forced to take LOL's spot would be stuck in Zeta and while I won't say 0-16.....I will say it wouldn't be a pretty season. They'd have to compete with elite WL teams who just had an entire week of recruiting that consisted of "hey we're in the WL, play for us". Anyone who replaced LOL right now would be at an EXTREME disadvantage against teams who are already the best in GLB and likely didn't even need the advantage to win in the first place.

SISW is in Lion conf. The team would come from Elephant conf for those not in touch with reality like shevegas. Also, WWR is "predicted" (lol @ prediction threads) to go 3-12.

Try again shevegas, as this is another fail on your part.

Also, since you're obviously checking out the WL forums, why not try your hand at posting there? Probably because you know you'd be laughed out in all of 2 minutes

Shevegas, you like to say all the LOL former players are trolls and such for posting in the APL forums. Who's really the troll here?

Thread started by Shevegas 7/31/09 http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3063626
Thread started by Shevegas 8/4/09 http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3090206
Thread started by Shevegas 8/4/09 http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3100589
Thread started by Shevegas 8/5/09 http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3098933
Thread started by Shevegas 8/6/09 http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3104110 (this thread)

Do you see any threads started by any LOL players, former or current, trolling you or anyone else in APL? If not, why don't you get over your infatuation with us and move on? You've proven what a psychopath you are for 8 seasons now. No need to prove it to all the new people as well. Think of it as a fresh start to being on your way to recovery?

Jokieman - I think your first line can be answered in a much easier way.

Who's really the troll here? SheVegas.

lol...no seriously Vegas you make me chuckle...Carry on the good work.

I wasn't trying to disrespect any teams here, mostly just trolling/joking really.

Also SheVegas wanted to bet me that SISW would go 0-16 in WL. How the fuck are we supposed to settle that bet?

"Hey SISW, you have to scrimmage all WL teams this season to settle a bet between SheVegas and me"

Originally posted by MattyP
I wasn't trying to disrespect any teams here, mostly just trolling/joking really.

Also SheVegas wanted to bet me that SISW would go 0-16 in WL. How the fuck are we supposed to settle that bet?

"Hey SISW, you have to scrimmage all WL teams this season to settle a bet between SheVegas and me"

Its pretty clear shevegas only puts bets out there that are completely insane so that he can try and say people aren't manning up and taking his bets.

You sheep are flipping idiots...I don't post on the WL thread because I have no players in WL.
Second I said I would bet Matty P that the Wolves would NOT go 0-16 in the WL, like HE said they would.
Third....So Jokieman since your trolling sheep didn't START threads in APL, that means they are not trolling???? But they can post in threads...LMAO....you are the biggest douche in this game.
Vegas

Originally posted by SheVegas
You sheep are flipping idiots...I don't post on the WL thread because I have no players in WL.
Second I said I would bet Matty P that the Wolves would NOT go 0-16 in the WL, like HE said they would.
Third....So Jokieman since your trolling sheep didn't START threads in APL, that means they are not trolling???? But they can post in threads...LMAO....you are the biggest douche in this game.
Vegas

I'm just curious... outside of Lorenzo, mikelj, and other guys who are affiliated with your team, do you actually think ANYONE understands your logic?

Originally posted by soapbox
I'm just curious... outside of Lorenzo, mikelj, and other guys who are affiliated with your team, do you actually think ANYONE understands your logic?

Yep I think Byang, and Seorang...understand me.

Originally posted by SheVegas

Second I said I would bet Matty P that the Wolves would NOT go 0-16 in the WL, like HE said they would.


How exactly would this bet be settled?

Originally posted by wombat killer
Originally posted by SheVegas


Second I said I would bet Matty P that the Wolves would NOT go 0-16 in the WL, like HE said they would.


How exactly would this bet be settled?

I think he just wants MattyP to say yes or no.

If yes: SV will use that post to turn SISW against him
If no: SV will call MattyP a pussy and etc

It's pretty clear by now.

Originally posted by soapbox
I think he just wants MattyP to say yes or no.

If yes: SV will use that post to turn SISW against him
If no: SV will call MattyP a pussy and etc

It's pretty clear by now.

I guess that seems like the plausible situations yes, but I usually just ignore what MattyP says anyway so